IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i6p1961-1978.html

Packaging environmental impact on seafood supply chains: A review of life cycle assessment studies

Author

Listed:
  • Cheila Almeida
  • Philippe Loubet
  • Tamíris Pacheco da Costa
  • Paula Quinteiro
  • Jara Laso
  • David Baptista de Sousa
  • Ronan Cooney
  • Sinead Mellett
  • Guido Sonnemann
  • Carlos José Rodríguez
  • Neil Rowan
  • Eoghan Clifford
  • Israel Ruiz‐Salmón
  • María Margallo
  • Rubén Aldaco
  • Maria Leonor Nunes
  • Ana Cláudia Dias
  • António Marques

Abstract

Packaging is fundamental for food preservation and transportation but generates an environmental burden from its production and end‐of‐life management. This review evaluates packaging contribution to the environmental performance of seafood products. Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies were evaluated by both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis assessed how direct (e.g., packaging material) and indirect impacts (e.g., influence on seafood loss and waste) have been considered, while the quantitative analysis evaluated packaging contribution to products’ weight and climate change impact. Qualitative analysis revealed that seafood LCAs focus mainly on direct environmental impacts arising from packaging materials, for which some articles conducted sensitivity analysis to assess materials substitution. Recycling was found to be the most common recommendation to diminish direct potential environmental impacts arising from packaging end‐of‐life. However, standardized recovery rates and other end‐of‐life options (e.g., reuse), should be considered. Quantitative analysis revealed that cans' production contributes significantly to the overall climate change impact for canned products. On average, it contributes to 42% of a product's climate change impact and 27% of a product's weight. Packaging has a lower contribution when considering freezing, chilling, and other post‐harvesting processing. It represents on average less than 5% of a product's climate change impact (less than 1 kg CO2 eq/kg) and 6% of a product's weight. Packaging material production is more relevant to aluminum, tinplate, and glass than for plastic and paper. Therefore, it is essential to accurately include these materials and their associated processes in inventories to improve the environmental assessment of seafood products.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheila Almeida & Philippe Loubet & Tamíris Pacheco da Costa & Paula Quinteiro & Jara Laso & David Baptista de Sousa & Ronan Cooney & Sinead Mellett & Guido Sonnemann & Carlos José Rodríguez & Neil Row, 2022. "Packaging environmental impact on seafood supply chains: A review of life cycle assessment studies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1961-1978, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:6:p:1961-1978
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13189
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Tamburini & Elisa Anna Fano & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Edoardo Turolla, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Oyster Farming in the Po Delta, Northern Italy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Friederike Ziegler & Andreas Emanuelsson & John Lucas Eichelsheim & Anna Flysjö & Vaque Ndiaye & Mikkel Thrane, 2011. "Extended Life Cycle Assessment of Southern Pink Shrimp Products Originating in Senegalese Artisanal and Industrial Fisheries for Export to Europe," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(4), pages 527-538, August.
    3. Martin C. Heller & Susan E. M. Selke & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2019. "Mapping the Influence of Food Waste in Food Packaging Environmental Performance Assessments," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(2), pages 480-495, April.
    4. Cheila Almeida & Sofia Vaz & Friederike Ziegler, 2015. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of a Canned Sardine Product from Portugal," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(4), pages 607-617, August.
    5. Erik Pauer & Bernhard Wohner & Victoria Heinrich & Manfred Tacker, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Food Packaging: An Extended Life Cycle Assessment including Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste and Circularity Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Ingrid E. Putten & Anna K. Farmery & Bridget S. Green & Alistair J. Hobday & Lilly Lim-Camacho & Ana Norman-López & Robert W. Parker, 2016. "The Environmental Impact of Two Australian Rock Lobster Fishery Supply Chains under a Changing Climate," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(6), pages 1384-1398, December.
    7. Robert W. R. Parker & Julia L. Blanchard & Caleb Gardner & Bridget S. Green & Klaas Hartmann & Peter H. Tyedmers & Reg A. Watson, 2018. "Fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions of world fisheries," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 333-337, April.
    8. Vázquez-Rowe, Ian & Moreira, María Teresa & Feijoo, Gumersindo, 2012. "Environmental assessment of frozen common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) captured by Spanish fishing vessels in the Mauritanian EEZ," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 180-188, January.
    9. Vázquez-Rowe, Ian & Villanueva-Rey, Pedro & Moreira, Mª Teresa & Feijoo, Gumersindo, 2013. "The role of consumer purchase and post-purchase decision-making in sustainable seafood consumption. A Spanish case study using carbon footprinting," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 94-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Cortés & Sara González‐García & Amaya Franco‐Uría & Maria Teresa Moreira & Gumersindo Feijoo, 2022. "Evaluation of the environmental sustainability of the inshore great scallop (Pecten maximus) fishery in Galicia," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1920-1933, December.
    2. Nijdam, Durk & Rood, Trudy & Westhoek, Henk, 2012. "The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 760-770.
    3. Christina Tsouti & Christina Papadaskalopoulou & Angeliki Konsta & Panagiotis Andrikopoulos & Margarita Panagiotopoulou & Sofia Papadaki & Christos Boukouvalas & Magdalini Krokida & Katerina Valta, 2023. "Investigating the Environmental Benefits of Novel Films for the Packaging of Fresh Tomatoes Enriched with Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compounds through Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Jara Laso & Israel Ruiz-Salmón & María Margallo & Pedro Villanueva-Rey & Lucía Poceiro & Paula Quinteiro & Ana Cláudia Dias & Cheila Almeida & António Marques & Eduardo Entrena-Barbero & María Teresa , 2022. "Achieving Sustainability of the Seafood Sector in the European Atlantic Area by Addressing Eco-Social Challenges: The NEPTUNUS Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Rodríguez-Fuentes, Marian & Zepeda-Domínguez, José Alberto & Kluger, Lotta C. & Fumero-Andreu, Claudia María & Ponce-Díaz, Germán & Zetina-Rejón, Manuel J., 2025. "Supply networks of fisheries social-ecological systems: A systematic review of the network approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Lotta Ruippo & Hanna Koivula & Jaana Korhonen & Anne Toppinen & Eliisa Kylkilahti, 2023. "Innovating for Sustainability: Attributes, Motivations, and Responsibilities in the Finnish Food Packaging Ecosystem," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 919-937, June.
    7. Monia Niero & Charlotte L. Jensen & Chiara Farné Fratini & Jens Dorland & Michael S. Jørgensen & Susse Georg, 2021. "Is life cycle assessment enough to address unintended side effects from Circular Economy initiatives?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1111-1120, October.
    8. Samadhi Hemachandra & Simone Pettigrew, 2025. "Sustainability Implications of Changes in Types and Variability of Yoghurt Packaging Solutions over a Decade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Mohamed Keznine & Soufiane Hasni & Sara A. A. Al Mabruk & Manal Demiathi & Mohamed Analla & Mustapha Aksissou, 2023. "A Socioeconomic Study of the Coastal Fishing Fleet in the Al Hoceima Port (Moroccan Mediterranean)," International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Roberto Petrucci & Gabriele Menegaldo & Lucia Rocchi & Luisa Paolotti & Antonio Boggia & Debora Puglia, 2025. "Olive Oil Wastewater Revalorization into a High-Added Value Product: A Biofertilizer Assessment Combining LCA and MCI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Ana Fernández‐Ríos & Sandra Ceballos‐Santos & Jara Laso & Cristina Campos & Jorge Cristóbal & María Margallo & Rubén Aldaco & Israel Ruiz‐Salmón, 2022. "From the sea to the table: The environmental impact assessment of fishing, processing, and end‐of‐life of albacore in Cantabria," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1934-1946, December.
    12. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Jordi Guillen & Natacha Carvalho & Griffin Carpenter & Antonio Borriello & Angel Calvo Santos, 2023. "Economic Impact of High Fuel Prices on the EU Fishing Fleet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-10, September.
    14. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2021. "Sustainable Production and Consumption of Food. Mise-en-Place Circular Economy Policies and Waste Management Practices in Tourism Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Usha Ramanathan & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan & Abiodun Adefisan & Tamíris Da Costa & Xavier Cama-Moncunill & Gautam Samriya, 2022. "Adapting Digital Technologies to Reduce Food Waste and Improve Operational Efficiency of a Frozen Food Company—The Case of Yumchop Foods in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Wanqiu Hu & Jinping Tian & Xing Li & Lujun Chen, 2020. "Wastewater treatment system optimization with an industrial symbiosis model: A case study of a Chinese eco‐industrial park," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1338-1351, December.
    17. Jie Huang & Zimin Sun & Pengshu Zhong, 2022. "The Spatial Disequilibrium and Dynamic Evolution of the Net Agriculture Carbon Effect in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Vicente, Filipa A. & Hren, Robert & Novak, Uroš & Čuček, Lidija & Likozar, Blaž & Vujanović, Annamaria, 2024. "Energy demand distribution and environmental impact assessment of chitosan production from shrimp shells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    19. Cristóvão Fraga Andrade Pereira da Rocha & Catarina de Sousa Tavares Pinho da Silva & Rafaela Martins da Silva & Manuel Joaquim da Silva Oliveira & Belmira de Almeida Ferreira Neto, 2023. "The Dietary Carbon Footprint of Portuguese Adults: Defining and Assessing Mitigation Scenarios for Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Paula Silva, 2025. "Adolescents’ Perceptions of Sustainable Diets: Myths, Realities, and School-Based Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-28, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:6:p:1961-1978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.