IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i6p1961-1978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Packaging environmental impact on seafood supply chains: A review of life cycle assessment studies

Author

Listed:
  • Cheila Almeida
  • Philippe Loubet
  • Tamíris Pacheco da Costa
  • Paula Quinteiro
  • Jara Laso
  • David Baptista de Sousa
  • Ronan Cooney
  • Sinead Mellett
  • Guido Sonnemann
  • Carlos José Rodríguez
  • Neil Rowan
  • Eoghan Clifford
  • Israel Ruiz‐Salmón
  • María Margallo
  • Rubén Aldaco
  • Maria Leonor Nunes
  • Ana Cláudia Dias
  • António Marques

Abstract

Packaging is fundamental for food preservation and transportation but generates an environmental burden from its production and end‐of‐life management. This review evaluates packaging contribution to the environmental performance of seafood products. Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies were evaluated by both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis assessed how direct (e.g., packaging material) and indirect impacts (e.g., influence on seafood loss and waste) have been considered, while the quantitative analysis evaluated packaging contribution to products’ weight and climate change impact. Qualitative analysis revealed that seafood LCAs focus mainly on direct environmental impacts arising from packaging materials, for which some articles conducted sensitivity analysis to assess materials substitution. Recycling was found to be the most common recommendation to diminish direct potential environmental impacts arising from packaging end‐of‐life. However, standardized recovery rates and other end‐of‐life options (e.g., reuse), should be considered. Quantitative analysis revealed that cans' production contributes significantly to the overall climate change impact for canned products. On average, it contributes to 42% of a product's climate change impact and 27% of a product's weight. Packaging has a lower contribution when considering freezing, chilling, and other post‐harvesting processing. It represents on average less than 5% of a product's climate change impact (less than 1 kg CO2 eq/kg) and 6% of a product's weight. Packaging material production is more relevant to aluminum, tinplate, and glass than for plastic and paper. Therefore, it is essential to accurately include these materials and their associated processes in inventories to improve the environmental assessment of seafood products.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheila Almeida & Philippe Loubet & Tamíris Pacheco da Costa & Paula Quinteiro & Jara Laso & David Baptista de Sousa & Ronan Cooney & Sinead Mellett & Guido Sonnemann & Carlos José Rodríguez & Neil Row, 2022. "Packaging environmental impact on seafood supply chains: A review of life cycle assessment studies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1961-1978, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:6:p:1961-1978
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13189
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Tamburini & Elisa Anna Fano & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Edoardo Turolla, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Oyster Farming in the Po Delta, Northern Italy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Ingrid E. Putten & Anna K. Farmery & Bridget S. Green & Alistair J. Hobday & Lilly Lim-Camacho & Ana Norman-López & Robert W. Parker, 2016. "The Environmental Impact of Two Australian Rock Lobster Fishery Supply Chains under a Changing Climate," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(6), pages 1384-1398, December.
    3. Erik Pauer & Bernhard Wohner & Victoria Heinrich & Manfred Tacker, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Food Packaging: An Extended Life Cycle Assessment including Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste and Circularity Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Robert W. R. Parker & Julia L. Blanchard & Caleb Gardner & Bridget S. Green & Klaas Hartmann & Peter H. Tyedmers & Reg A. Watson, 2018. "Fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions of world fisheries," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 333-337, April.
    5. Friederike Ziegler & Andreas Emanuelsson & John Lucas Eichelsheim & Anna Flysjö & Vaque Ndiaye & Mikkel Thrane, 2011. "Extended Life Cycle Assessment of Southern Pink Shrimp Products Originating in Senegalese Artisanal and Industrial Fisheries for Export to Europe," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(4), pages 527-538, August.
    6. Martin C. Heller & Susan E. M. Selke & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2019. "Mapping the Influence of Food Waste in Food Packaging Environmental Performance Assessments," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(2), pages 480-495, April.
    7. Cheila Almeida & Sofia Vaz & Friederike Ziegler, 2015. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of a Canned Sardine Product from Portugal," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(4), pages 607-617, August.
    8. Vázquez-Rowe, Ian & Moreira, María Teresa & Feijoo, Gumersindo, 2012. "Environmental assessment of frozen common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) captured by Spanish fishing vessels in the Mauritanian EEZ," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 180-188, January.
    9. Vázquez-Rowe, Ian & Villanueva-Rey, Pedro & Moreira, Mª Teresa & Feijoo, Gumersindo, 2013. "The role of consumer purchase and post-purchase decision-making in sustainable seafood consumption. A Spanish case study using carbon footprinting," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 94-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Cortés & Sara González‐García & Amaya Franco‐Uría & Maria Teresa Moreira & Gumersindo Feijoo, 2022. "Evaluation of the environmental sustainability of the inshore great scallop (Pecten maximus) fishery in Galicia," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1920-1933, December.
    2. Christina Tsouti & Christina Papadaskalopoulou & Angeliki Konsta & Panagiotis Andrikopoulos & Margarita Panagiotopoulou & Sofia Papadaki & Christos Boukouvalas & Magdalini Krokida & Katerina Valta, 2023. "Investigating the Environmental Benefits of Novel Films for the Packaging of Fresh Tomatoes Enriched with Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compounds through Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Nijdam, Durk & Rood, Trudy & Westhoek, Henk, 2012. "The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 760-770.
    4. Jara Laso & Israel Ruiz-Salmón & María Margallo & Pedro Villanueva-Rey & Lucía Poceiro & Paula Quinteiro & Ana Cláudia Dias & Cheila Almeida & António Marques & Eduardo Entrena-Barbero & María Teresa , 2022. "Achieving Sustainability of the Seafood Sector in the European Atlantic Area by Addressing Eco-Social Challenges: The NEPTUNUS Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Lotta Ruippo & Hanna Koivula & Jaana Korhonen & Anne Toppinen & Eliisa Kylkilahti, 2023. "Innovating for Sustainability: Attributes, Motivations, and Responsibilities in the Finnish Food Packaging Ecosystem," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    6. Monia Niero & Charlotte L. Jensen & Chiara Farné Fratini & Jens Dorland & Michael S. Jørgensen & Susse Georg, 2021. "Is life cycle assessment enough to address unintended side effects from Circular Economy initiatives?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1111-1120, October.
    7. Ana Fernández‐Ríos & Sandra Ceballos‐Santos & Jara Laso & Cristina Campos & Jorge Cristóbal & María Margallo & Rubén Aldaco & Israel Ruiz‐Salmón, 2022. "From the sea to the table: The environmental impact assessment of fishing, processing, and end‐of‐life of albacore in Cantabria," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1934-1946, December.
    8. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Jordi Guillen & Natacha Carvalho & Griffin Carpenter & Antonio Borriello & Angel Calvo Santos, 2023. "Economic Impact of High Fuel Prices on the EU Fishing Fleet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-10, September.
    10. Wanqiu Hu & Jinping Tian & Xing Li & Lujun Chen, 2020. "Wastewater treatment system optimization with an industrial symbiosis model: A case study of a Chinese eco‐industrial park," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1338-1351, December.
    11. Jie Huang & Zimin Sun & Pengshu Zhong, 2022. "The Spatial Disequilibrium and Dynamic Evolution of the Net Agriculture Carbon Effect in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Vázquez-Rowe, Ian & Villanueva-Rey, Pedro & Moreira, Mª Teresa & Feijoo, Gumersindo, 2013. "The role of consumer purchase and post-purchase decision-making in sustainable seafood consumption. A Spanish case study using carbon footprinting," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 94-102.
    13. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Alberto Pardossi, 2020. "Improving Policy Evidence Base for Agricultural Sustainability and Food Security: A Content Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, February.
    14. Maria João Pereira & Oceane Grosjean & Manuela Pintado & Carla Brazinha & João Crespo, 2022. "Clean Technologies for Production of Valuable Fractions from Sardine Cooking Wastewaters: An Integrated Process of Flocculation and Reverse Osmosis," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Olavo Pinto & Beatriz Casais, 2023. "Multilevel implications for anti-consumption social marketing within the public policy framework for SDG realization: a systematic literature review," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(3), pages 605-634, September.
    16. Marion Garaus & Christian Garaus & Elisabeth Wolfsteiner & Charlotte Jermendy, 2022. "Anthropomorphism as a Differentiation Strategy for Standardized Reusable Glass Containers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Pasquale Pazienza & Caterina Lucia, 2020. "How does FDI in the “agricultural and fishing” sector affect methane emission? Evidence from the OECD countries," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 37(2), pages 441-462, July.
    18. Nate Stephens & Rupert A. Hurley & Robert Kimmel & William Bridges & Ami Frierson & Duncan Darby & Jeanne Skaggs & Maggie Albro, 2023. "The Environmental Impacts of Caesar Salad Packaging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-60, June.
    19. Nathana L. Cristofoli & Alexandre R. Lima & Rose D. N. Tchonkouang & Andreia C. Quintino & Margarida C. Vieira, 2023. "Advances in the Food Packaging Production from Agri-Food Waste and By-Products: Market Trends for a Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-33, April.
    20. Erik Roos Lindgreen & Roberta Salomone & Tatiana Reyes, 2020. "A Critical Review of Academic Approaches, Methods and Tools to Assess Circular Economy at the Micro Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-27, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:6:p:1961-1978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.