IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v56y2025i2p173-181.html

Towards Better Understanding of Party‐Union Relationship: An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Paweł Kamiński
  • Szczepan Czarnecki

Abstract

In many European democracies, political parties and trade unions have developed a long‐standing relationship. This relationship has certainly evolved over the last few decades as both actors have had to adapt to changes in their constituencies. This study examines the evolving dynamics between political parties and trade unions across Europe, with a focus on both Western and Central‐Eastern European contexts. By utilising data from the Comparative Interest Group survey, we investigate how factors such as political power, resources, and ideological alignments influence these interactions. Our findings reveal that unions prioritise contacts with ruling parties, underscoring the importance of political access. Despite assumptions, financial resources alone do not determine engagement frequency, as well as ideological alliances. We also highlight differing contact levels influenced by political systems, showing that pluralist environments foster more interaction compared to corporatist settings. This research contributes valuable insights into the adaptive strategies of trade unions in contemporary democracies, reflecting on historical ties and varying institutional landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Paweł Kamiński & Szczepan Czarnecki, 2025. "Towards Better Understanding of Party‐Union Relationship: An Empirical Analysis," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 173-181, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:56:y:2025:i:2:p:173-181
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.12457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12457
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.12457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaqués-Bonafont, Laura & Cristancho, Camilo & Muñoz-Márquez, Luz & Rincón, Leire, 2021. "The contingent character of interest groups–political parties’ interaction," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 440-461, September.
    2. Richard Hyman & Rebecca Gumbrell-McCormick, 2010. "Trade unions, politics and parties: is a new configuration possible?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 16(3), pages 315-331, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorenzo Frangi & Sebastian Koos & Sinisa Hadziabdic, 2017. "In Unions We Trust! Analysing Confidence in Unions across Europe," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 831-858, December.
    2. Emmett Caraker & Henning Jørgensen & Mogens O Madsen & Kelvin Baadsgaard, 2016. "Representation without co-determination? Participation and co-determination for semi-professional shop stewards in the collective participation system in Denmark," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(2), pages 269-295, May.
    3. Hadziabdic, Sinisa, 2023. "Turning no tides: Union effects on partisan preferences and the working-class metamorphosis," MPIfG Discussion Paper 23/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Maria da Paz Campos Lima & Antonio Martín Artiles, 2011. "Crisis and trade union challenges in Portugal and Spain: between general strikes and social pacts," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(3), pages 387-402, August.
    5. Rebecca Gumbrell-McCormick, 2013. "The International Trade Union Confederation: From Two (or More?) Identities to One," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(2), pages 240-263, June.
    6. Budd, John W. & Lamare, J. Ryan, 2021. "The importance of political systems for trade union membership, coverage and influence: theory and comparative evidence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125307, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Andrew Keyes & Zachary A Russell & Jack Fiorito, 2023. "The union experience: Workplace instrumentality, prosocial unionism, and union satisfaction," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(4), pages 1239-1265, November.
    8. Yadong Cui & Su Xu & Yaohui Jiang & Zhaowen Zhang & Haoyu Hu, 2025. "Can Chinese‐style trade unions promote corporate philanthropy? A stakeholder theory perspective," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1813-1830, October.
    9. Arnhild Bie-Drivdal, 2021. "Public sector unions’ ideas about employee-driven development: Restricted conceptualization of representative participation in workplaces," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(3), pages 852-872, August.
    10. Carola Frege & John Kelly & Patrick McGovern, 2011. "Richard Hyman: Marxism, Trade Unionism and Comparative Employment Relations," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 49(2), pages 209-230, June.
    11. Gregor Murray, 2017. "Union renewal: what can we learn from three decades of research?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(1), pages 9-29, February.
    12. Labib Shami & Teddy Lazebnik, 2025. "Got much, got nothing: analyzing the impact of increased special interest groups’ influence on utility," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1021-1044, December.
    13. Andrew Keyes & Jack Fiorito & Pauline de Becdelièvre, 2025. "C’est pareil mais différent: A comparison of union support in France and the U.S," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 31(4), pages 439-462, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:56:y:2025:i:2:p:173-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.