IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v46y2015i5-6p345-364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour under the law: a new law of combination, and master and servant, in 21st-century Britain?

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Smith

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Smith, 2015. "Labour under the law: a new law of combination, and master and servant, in 21st-century Britain?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5-6), pages 345-364, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:46:y:2015:i:5-6:p:345-364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/irj.12116
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Curthoys, Mark, 2004. "Governments, Labour, and the Law in Mid-Victorian Britain: The Trade Union Legislation of the 1870s," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199268894, Decembrie.
    2. Deakin, Simon & Wilkinson, Frank, 2005. "The Law of the Labour Market: Industrialization, Employment, and Legal Evolution," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198152811, Decembrie.
    3. H. Gregg Lewis, 1951. "The Labor-Monopoly Problem: A Positive Program," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(4), pages 277-277.
    4. John McIlroy, 1998. "The Enduring Alliance? Trade Unions and the Making of New Labour, 1994–1997," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 537-564, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Smith, 2019. "Rookes v. Barnard and the trade union question in British politics," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5-6), pages 431-449, November.
    2. Ian Cunningham & Philip James & Alina Baluch, 2022. "The influence of ‘soft’ fair work regulation on union recovery: A case of re‐recognition in the Scottish voluntary social care sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 261-277, May.
    3. Richard Croucher & Geoffrey Wood, 2017. "Union renewal in historical perspective," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(6), pages 1010-1020, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon DEAKIN & Jonas MALMBERG & Prabirjit SARKAR, 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970–2010," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 153(1), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Antonio OJEDA AVILÉS, 2009. "The “externalization” of labour law," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 148(1-2), pages 47-67, June.
    3. Antonio ALOISI & Valerio DE STEFANO, 2020. "Regulation and the future of work: The employment relationship as an innovation facilitator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 47-69, March.
    4. repec:ilo:ilowps:486240 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Toms, Steven & Fleischman, Richard K., 2015. "Accounting fundamentals and accounting change: Boulton & Watt and the Springfield Armory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-20.
    6. Zoe Adams & Simon Deakin, 2014. "Institutional Solutions to Precariousness and Inequality in Labour Markets," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 779-809, December.
    7. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2010. "Chicago and the Development of Twentieth-Century Labor Economics," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Simon Deakin, 2016. "The Contribution of Labour Law to Economic Development & Growth," Working Papers wp478, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    9. Didry, Claude, 2012. "Labour law as social questioning: The contribution of the "Labour Conventions Approach" to a different history of socioeconomic institutions," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 14(1), pages 11-19.
    10. Suresh Naidu & Noam Yuchtman, 2013. "Coercive Contract Enforcement: Law and the Labor Market in Nineteenth Century Industrial Britain," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(1), pages 107-144, February.
    11. Roger Seifert & Tom Sibley, 2011. "It's Politics, Stupid: The 2002–2004 UK Firefighters' Dispute," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 49(Supplemen), pages 332-352, July.
    12. Colm McLaughlin, 2009. "The Productivity‐Enhancing Impacts of the Minimum Wage: Lessons from Denmark and New Zealand," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(2), pages 327-348, June.
    13. Simon Deakin, 2017. "Tony Lawson’s Theory of the Corporation: Towards a Social Ontology of Law," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(5), pages 1505-1523.
    14. Wenjia ZHUANG & Kinglun NGOK, 2014. "Labour inspection in contemporary China: Like the Anglo-Saxon model, but different," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 153(4), pages 561-585, December.
    15. Simon Deakin & Christopher Markou & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "The Law-Technology Cycle & the Future of Work," Working Papers wp504, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    16. Mark Wickham-Jones, 2014. "Introducing OMOV: The Labour Party–Trade Union Review Group and the 1994 Leadership Contest," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 33-56, March.
    17. Aristea Koukiadaki, 2010. "The establishment and operation of information and consultation of employees’ arrangements in a capability-based framework," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 31(3), pages 365-388, August.
    18. Janine Berg, 2017. "Contractual status, worker well-being and economic development," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 60(2), pages 121-136, June.
    19. Shaun Wilson & Benjamin Spies‐Butcher, 2011. "When Labour Makes a Difference: Union Mobilization and the 2007 Federal Election in Australia," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 49(Supplemen), pages 306-331, July.
    20. Enying Zheng & Simon Deakin, 2016. "State and Knowledge Production: Industrial Relations Scholarship under Chinese Capitalism," Working Papers wp480, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    21. Simon Deakin, 2014. "Labour Law and Inclusive Development," Working Papers wp458, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:46:y:2015:i:5-6:p:345-364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.