IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v46y2015i5-6p345-364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour under the law: a new law of combination, and master and servant, in 21st-century Britain?

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Smith

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Smith, 2015. "Labour under the law: a new law of combination, and master and servant, in 21st-century Britain?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5-6), pages 345-364, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:46:y:2015:i:5-6:p:345-364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/irj.12116
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Curthoys, Mark, 2004. "Governments, Labour, and the Law in Mid-Victorian Britain: The Trade Union Legislation of the 1870s," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199268894, Decembrie.
    2. Deakin, Simon & Wilkinson, Frank, 2005. "The Law of the Labour Market: Industrialization, Employment, and Legal Evolution," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198152811, Decembrie.
    3. H. Gregg Lewis, 1951. "The Labor-Monopoly Problem: A Positive Program," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59, pages 277-277.
    4. John McIlroy, 1998. "The Enduring Alliance? Trade Unions and the Making of New Labour, 1994–1997," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 537-564, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Croucher & Geoffrey Wood, 2017. "Union renewal in historical perspective," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(6), pages 1010-1020, December.
    2. Paul Smith, 2019. "Rookes v. Barnard and the trade union question in British politics," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5-6), pages 431-449, November.
    3. Ian Cunningham & Philip James & Alina Baluch, 2022. "The influence of ‘soft’ fair work regulation on union recovery: A case of re‐recognition in the Scottish voluntary social care sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 261-277, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Bryson & P Willman, 2007. "Union Organization in Great Britain," CEP Discussion Papers dp0774, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Simon DEAKIN & Jonas MALMBERG & Prabirjit SARKAR, 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970–2010," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 153(1), pages 1-27, March.
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:403814 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Zoe Adams & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "'Wage', 'Salary' & 'Remuneration': A Genealogical Exploration of Juridical Terms & Their Significance for the Employer's Power to Make Deductions from Wages," Working Papers wp499, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    5. Antonio OJEDA AVILÉS, 2009. "The “externalization” of labour law," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 148(1-2), pages 47-67, June.
    6. Simon Deakin & Shelley Marshall & Sanjay Pinto, 2020. "Labour Laws, Informality, and Development: Comparing India and China," Working Papers wp518, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    7. Sheila C. Blackburn, 2009. "Curse or Cure? Why Was the Enactment of Britain's 1909 Trade Boards Act so Controversial?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(2), pages 214-239, June.
    8. Antonio ALOISI & Valerio DE STEFANO, 2020. "Regulation and the future of work: The employment relationship as an innovation facilitator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 47-69, March.
    9. repec:ilo:ilowps:486240 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Toms, Steven & Fleischman, Richard K., 2015. "Accounting fundamentals and accounting change: Boulton & Watt and the Springfield Armory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-20.
    11. Zoe Adams & Simon Deakin, 2014. "Institutional Solutions to Precariousness and Inequality in Labour Markets," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 779-809, December.
    12. Simon Deakin, 2013. "Addressing Labour Market Segmentation: The Role of Labour Law," Working Papers wp446, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    13. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2010. "Chicago and the Development of Twentieth-Century Labor Economics," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2009. "Promoting Labour Market Efficiency and Fairness through a Legal Minimum Wage: The Webbs and the Social Cost of Labour," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(2), pages 306-326, June.
    15. Simon Deakin, 2016. "The Contribution of Labour Law to Economic Development & Growth," Working Papers wp478, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    16. Chen Ding & Deakin Simon, 2015. "On Heaven’s Lathe: State, Rule of Law, and Economic Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 123-145, June.
    17. Simon DEAKIN & Priya LELE & Mathias SIEMS, 2007. "The evolution of labour law: Calibrating and comparing regulatory regimes," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 146(3-4), pages 133-162, September.
    18. John Buchanan, 2008. "Labour Market Efficiency and Fairness: Agreements and the Independent Resolution of Difference," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 18(2), pages 85-95, May.
    19. Suresh Naidu & Noam Yuchtman, 2011. "Coercive Contract Enforcement: Law and the Labor Market in 19th Century Industrial Britain," NBER Working Papers 17051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Didry, Claude, 2012. "Labour law as social questioning: The contribution of the "Labour Conventions Approach" to a different history of socioeconomic institutions," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 14(1), pages 11-19.
    21. Suresh Naidu & Noam Yuchtman, 2013. "Coercive Contract Enforcement: Law and the Labor Market in Nineteenth Century Industrial Britain," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(1), pages 107-144, February.
    22. Hupfel, Simon, 2022. "The Economists and The Combination Laws: A Reappraisal," SocArXiv uvfqa, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:46:y:2015:i:5-6:p:345-364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.