IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v17y2026i1p94-106.html

Private Network Realignment: State Strategies Versus Market‐Driven Globalization in the Subsea Cable Network

Author

Listed:
  • Joscha Abels

Abstract

Much of the subsea cable network, which carries the vast majority of global internet traffic, is developed, owned, and operated by private corporations. In an era of growing global tensions, states have come to view these cables as critical to their interests. The article addresses the disconnect between statecraft‐centric explanations and the market‐driven development of global networks. It introduces the concept of private network realignment: Political interventions aimed at retroactively reshaping infrastructures and adjacent markets by influencing the decisions of private corporations. After decades of neoliberal globalization, networks are often organized around large corporations that drive their development. In reaction, states employ varied realignment strategies, the choice of which depends on their position in the network as well as that of relevant corporate actors. Empirically, the article examines two instructive, prototypical cases: the US–China conflict over the SeaMeWe‐6 subsea cable system, and France's nationalization of Alcatel Submarine Networks. The findings highlight the uneven effectiveness of great power interventions, which opens up space for other highly connected powers to pursue autonomous network realignment strategies. The article contributes to contemporary debates on network competition, providing a perspective on how market dynamics and state strategizing intersect in the development of global networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Joscha Abels, 2026. "Private Network Realignment: State Strategies Versus Market‐Driven Globalization in the Subsea Cable Network," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(1), pages 94-106, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:1:p:94-106
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70118
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milan Babic & Lukas Linsi, 2025. "Mapping Corporate Investments Between China and Europe in an Era of Geoeconomic Competition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 932-963, May.
    2. Richard Higgott & Simon Reich, 2022. "The age of fuzzy bifurcation: Lessons from the pandemic and the Ukraine War," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(5), pages 627-639, November.
    3. Lars Gjesvik, 2023. "Private infrastructure in weaponized interdependence," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 722-746, March.
    4. Di Carlo, Donato & Schmitz, Luuk, 2023. "Europe first? The rise of EU industrial policy promoting and protecting the single market," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 137532, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Linda Weiss & Elizabeth Thurbon, 2018. "Power paradox: how the extension of US infrastructural power abroad diminishes state capacity at home," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 779-810, November.
    6. Morten Ougaard, 2018. "The Transnational State and the Infrastructure Push," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 128-144, January.
    7. Mark Beeson, 2018. "Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics: the BRI and China’s evolving grand strategy," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 240-256, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sjorre Couvreur & Jaša Veselinovič, 2026. "An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 431-448, January.
    2. Goghie, Alexandru-Stefan, 2024. "The Infrastructural Power of the Cayman Islands and the US State Power: A Financial Networks Centrality Approach," SocArXiv acnrb_v1, Center for Open Science.
    3. Soon‐Ok Shin & Chris Alden & Richard Higgott, 2026. "Re‐Imagining Middle Powers in an Age of Global Transformation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(S1), pages 5-13, February.
    4. Buğra Süsler & Chris Alden, 2026. "Brokering Peace: Emerging Middle Powers, Agency and Mediation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(S1), pages 33-44, February.
    5. Jaša Veselinovič & Naná de Graaff, 2026. "Geoeconomic Exposure and EU Industrial Policy: Export Dependence Amid US–China Techno‐Nationalist Rivalry," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    6. Henryk Szadziewski, 2025. "Encompassing the everyday: Grounded responses to the geoeconomic," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(1), pages 118-122, February.
    7. Richard Higgott & Taelyn Reid, 2023. "Strongman leadership and the limits to international cooperation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(3), pages 451-463, June.
    8. Liu, Zhigao & Schindler, Seth & Liu, Weidong, 2020. "Demystifying Chinese overseas investment in infrastructure: Port development, the Belt and Road Initiative and regional development," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    9. Kathleen R. McNamara & Federico Steinberg, 2026. "Can Europe Sustain a New Rules‐Based Geopolitical Order?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 1624-1634, July.
    10. Schmitz, Luuk, 2026. "Hierarchies of Adaptation: Corporate Power in Economic Statecraft," SocArXiv gwuce_v1, Center for Open Science.
    11. Anna Geis & Ursula Schröder, 2024. "The Russian War Against Ukraine and Its Implications for the Future of Liberal Interventionism," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    12. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2025. "Blurring Boundaries: An Analysis of the Digital Platforms-Military Nexus," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1632-1663, August.
    13. Konrad, Kai A., 2024. "China’s public international investment: A strategic-trade-policy perspective," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. Gavin Shatkin, 2022. "Mega-urban politics: Analyzing the infrastructure turn through the national state lens," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(5), pages 845-866, August.
    15. Balázs Szent‐Iványi & Dóra Piroska, 2026. "Geopolitics on a Shoestring? Unpacking the EU'S Geopolitical External Assistance to Central Asia," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 1473-1495, July.
    16. Timo Seidl & Henrique Lopes‐Valença, 2026. "Waking a Dormant Legal Resource: Institutional Activation and the Origins of Important Projects of Common European Interest," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 1359-1381, July.
    17. Gianmarco Fifi & Xinchuchu Gao, 2026. "From the Green to the Just Transition: The Emergence of the Compensatory State in the EU's Approach to Climate Change," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 152-170, January.
    18. Henrik Brockenhuus‐Schack & Peter Nedergaard, 2026. "For the Times They Are A‐Changin': Towards a ‘Homeland Economics’ Paradigm of the European Union?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 467-490, March.
    19. Franken, Jonas & Reinhold, Thomas & Dörnfeld, Timon & Reuter, Christian, 2025. "Hidden structures of a global infrastructure: Expansion factors of the subsea data cable network," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    20. Thomas Christiansen, 2020. "The EU's New Normal: Consolidating European Integration in an Era of Populism and Geo‐Economics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(S1), pages 13-27, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:1:p:94-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.