IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v14y2026a11403.html

Geoeconomic Exposure and EU Industrial Policy: Export Dependence Amid US–China Techno‐Nationalist Rivalry

Author

Listed:
  • Jaša Veselinovič

    (Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Naná de Graaff

    (Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This article examines how export dependencies shape the EU’s industrial policy dynamics amid intensifying techno-nationalist rivalry between the US and China. While existing scholarship on how the intensifying geopolitical competition drives the EU’s “new industrial policy” has focused primarily on import dependencies, foreign direct investment, and political/security alliances, we argue that export dependence constitutes an equally consequential yet underexplored dimension of what we conceptualize as geoeconomic exposure. Advancing a critical political economy framework and incorporating insights from the growth model literature, we develop a framework for analyzing the export dependence element of geoeconomic exposure across two key dimensions of export dependence: first, the national economy and its growth model as a whole; and second, particular (export) sectors and their lead firms. Using descriptive statistical indicators, we map export dependence across five EU member states (Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands, and Slovenia) and show that, despite notable constituencies tied to Chinese demand, EU economies are structurally far more exposed to US markets. To illustrate how export dependencies shaped geoeconomic exposure and drove industrial policy dynamics, we then present three short case studies on the positioning of (a) Germany, Spain, and Slovenia in the process of the EU’s imposition of tariffs on Chinese-made EVs, (b) LVMH’s efforts at pacifying the EU’s relations with both the US and China, and (c) Dutch export controls of semiconductor manufacturing equipment. By foregrounding export dependencies as an element of geoeconomic exposure, this article advances a non-deterministic framework for understanding the structural conditions shaping actors’ strategizing in EU industrial policy amidst the emerging “geotech” world.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaša Veselinovič & Naná de Graaff, 2026. "Geoeconomic Exposure and EU Industrial Policy: Export Dependence Amid US–China Techno‐Nationalist Rivalry," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11403
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.11403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11403
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.11403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucio Baccaro & Sinisa Hadziabdic, 2024. "Operationalizing growth models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1325-1360, April.
    2. Milan Babic & Lukas Linsi, 2025. "Mapping Corporate Investments Between China and Europe in an Era of Geoeconomic Competition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 932-963, May.
    3. Ümit Akcay & Benjamin Jungmann, 2023. "Growth regimes, dominant social blocs and growth strategies: towards varieties of export-led growth regimes and strategies in Turkey and Poland," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 20(3), pages 539-560, December.
    4. Floor Doppen & Antonio Calcara & Dirk De Bièvre, 2024. "Balancing security and economics: domestic state-firm relations and investment screening mechanisms in Europe," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 1637-1661, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mokoena Sipho K., 2025. "Drivers of Changes in Government Expenditure: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 19-30.
    2. Joscha Abels, 2026. "Private Network Realignment: State Strategies Versus Market‐Driven Globalization in the Subsea Cable Network," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(1), pages 94-106, February.
    3. Floor Doppen, 2026. "From Competition to Co‐Operation? FDI Screening in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 1496-1514, July.
    4. Johan Ekman & Rune Møller Stahl & Magnus Ryner, 2025. "Northern Realignment? Explaining Nordic Consent to NextGenerationEU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 786-803, May.
    5. Jakub Szabó, 2026. "A choice for European monetary integration: politics of exchange rates between EMS and EMU," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Till Köveker & Fernanda Ballesteros & Franziska Klaucke & Antonia Kurz & Karsten Neuhoff & Paula Niemöller & Sangeeth Selvaraju, 2025. "Industry Transition to Climate Neutrality: Comparing Policy Approaches in Times of Geopolitical Fragmentation," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2114, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Schedelik, Michael & Nölke, Andreas, 2025. "Peripheral growth models and the global economy: A second image IPE perspective," MPIfG Discussion Paper 25/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Antonio Abatemarco & Giuseppina Autiero & Claudia Avossa, 2026. "Drivers of Cross-Country GDP Inequality in Europe: A Two-Stage Factor Decomposition, 1990–2024," Working Papers 693, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.