IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v64y2026i2p467-490.html

For the Times They Are A‐Changin': Towards a ‘Homeland Economics’ Paradigm of the European Union?

Author

Listed:
  • Henrik Brockenhuus‐Schack
  • Peter Nedergaard

Abstract

There is an ongoing academic debate on whether geopolitical aspirations are reshaping the paradigm of the EU's neoliberal industrial and trade policy. The scrutiny has intensified with China's new economic power, the Trump and Biden administrations, Covid‐19 and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. However, the theory of paradigm changes expects that the institutionalisation of a new paradigm requires an evolution, based on a series of mechanisms slowly eroding the legitimacy of the existing paradigm. This article investigates this process by formulating four causal chains, representing different scenarios for a new strategic paradigm in the EU's industrial and trade policy. Through the method of process tracing, it finds that the foundations for a new strategic paradigm were made under the Juncker Commission. Here, France formulated a new policy agenda, which was successfully pushed into EU economic policy‐making. Since then, the EU has moved towards a ‘Homeland Economics’ paradigm, though with important reservations.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrik Brockenhuus‐Schack & Peter Nedergaard, 2026. "For the Times They Are A‐Changin': Towards a ‘Homeland Economics’ Paradigm of the European Union?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 467-490, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:2:p:467-490
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13765
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Calmfors & Giancarlo Corsetti & Michael P. Devereux & Gilles Saint-Paul & Hans-Werner Sinn & Jan-Egbert Sturm & Xavier Vives, 2008. "EEAG Report on the European Economy 2008," EEAG Report on the European Economy, CESifo, vol. 0, pages 1-144, February.
    2. Pierre Haroche, 2023. "A ‘Geopolitical Commission’: Supranationalism Meets Global Power Competition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 970-987, July.
    3. Jean-Baptiste Velut & Gabriel Siles-Brügge & Louise Dalingwater, 2022. "Rethinking the Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion in Trade Politics," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 547-552, July.
    4. Orbie, Jan & De Ville, Ferdi, 2011. "The European Union's Trade Policy Response to the Crisis: Paradigm lost or reinforced?," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 15, April.
    5. Peter Nedergaard, 2009. "European Union Import Quotas on Chinese Textile and Clothing Exports in 2005: A Panic-Driven Commission or Rational Explanations?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 17-47, March.
    6. Luuk Schmitz & Timo Seidl, 2023. "As Open as Possible, as Autonomous as Necessary: Understanding the Rise of Open Strategic Autonomy in EU Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 834-852, May.
    7. Di Carlo, Donato & Schmitz, Luuk, 2023. "Europe first? The rise of EU industrial policy promoting and protecting the single market," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 137532, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Kim B. Olsen, 2022. "Diplomatic Realisation of the EU’s “Geoeconomic Pivot”: Sanctions, Trade, and Development Policy Reform," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 5-15.
    9. L. Johan Eliasson & Patricia Garcia‐Duran, 2023. "New is old? The EU's Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S3), pages 9-18, July.
    10. Wolfgang Weiß, 2023. "The EU's strategic autonomy in times of politicisation of international trade: The future of commission accountability," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S3), pages 54-64, July.
    11. Maria Demertzis & Gustav Fredriksson, 2018. "The EU Response to US Trade Tariffs," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 53(5), pages 260-268, September.
    12. Kim B. Olsen, 2022. "Diplomatic Realisation of the EU’s “Geoeconomic Pivot”: Sanctions, Trade, and Development Policy Reform," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 5-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sjorre Couvreur & Jaša Veselinovič, 2026. "An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 431-448, January.
    2. Patricia Garcia-Duran & L. Johan Eliasson & Oriol Costa, 2023. "Commerce and Security Meet in the European Union’s Trade Defence Instruments," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 165-176.
    3. Kathleen R. McNamara & Federico Steinberg, 2026. "Can Europe Sustain a New Rules‐Based Geopolitical Order?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 1624-1634, July.
    4. Roberta Capello & Roberto Dellisanti, 2025. "Unveiling Growth in Nearshoring Regions," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), December.
    5. Balázs Szent‐Iványi & Dóra Piroska, 2026. "Geopolitics on a Shoestring? Unpacking the EU'S Geopolitical External Assistance to Central Asia," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 1473-1495, July.
    6. Laia Comerma, 2026. "China as a Catalyst of the European Union's Trade Defence Instruments," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 693-719, March.
    7. Patricia Garcia-Duran & L. Johan Eliasson & Oriol Costa, 2023. "Commerce and Security Meet in the European Union’s Trade Defence Instruments," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 165-176.
    8. Patricia Garcia-Duran & Montserrat Millet, 2015. "Efficient multilateralism or bilateralism? The TTIP from an EU Trade Policy perspective," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2015/321, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    9. Thomas Conzelmann & Sophie Vanhoonacker, 2026. "The European Union in a Geo‐Economic World: Towards a New Inter‐Institutional Balance?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 511-532, March.
    10. Philipp Köncke & Nana de Graaff, 2024. "Chinese Multinationals and Europe’s Geoeconomic Turn: The De‐Globalization of the Chinese ICT and Automotive Industry?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    11. Beck, Stefan & Scherrer, Christoph, 2014. "Das transatlantische Handels- und Investitionsabkommen (TTIP) zwischen der EU und den USA," Arbeitspapiere 303, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    12. Joscha Abels, 2026. "Private Network Realignment: State Strategies Versus Market‐Driven Globalization in the Subsea Cable Network," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(1), pages 94-106, February.
    13. Jean-Baptiste Velut, 2023. "Trade Linkages or Disconnects? Labor Rights and Data Privacy in US Digital Trade Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 249-260.
    14. Georg Wenzelburger & Pascal D. König, 2025. "Sending Signals or Building Bridges? Digital Sovereignty in EU Communicative and Co‐Ordinative Discourse," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 526-547, March.
    15. Tomasz Jerzyniak, 2024. "The EU De‐Risking of Energy Dependencies: Towards a New Clean Energy Geopolitical Order?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    16. Métivier, Jeanne & Bacchetta, Marc & Bekkers, Eddy & Koopman, Robert, 2023. "International trade cooperation’s impact on the world economy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 713-744.
    17. Jappe Eckhardt, 2013. "EU Unilateral Trade Policy-Making: What Role for Import-Dependent Firms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 989-1005, November.
    18. Dario Guarascio & Mario Holzner & Donato Iacobucci & Valentina Meliciani, 2025. "European competitiveness in the new global context: structural constraints, strategic dependencies and the role of the new industrial policy," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 52(3), pages 525-533, September.
    19. Susanna Paleari, 2024. "The Role of Strategic Autonomy in the EU Green Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Christine Wieck & Bettina Rudloff & Kristina Mensah & Olayinka Kareem & Jose Ma Luis Montesclaros & David Orden & Niels Søndergaard & Wusheng Yu, 2024. "Geostrategic dimensions of recent food policy decisions," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(4), pages 1605-1626, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:2:p:467-490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.