IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v13y2022i3p371-389.html

Women’s Empowerment Without Power: Strategic v. Practical Interests in SDGs and the Voluntary National Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy Y. Kim
  • Yoorim Bang
  • Eun Mee Kim

Abstract

This study examines country's voluntary national reviews (VNRs) to assess global commitment to gender equality in the era of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). While the SDGs promise realisation of gender equality, progress data indicate that gender equality will not be achieved in the next century, let alone by the SDGs target date of 2030. This study posits two explanations for slow progress on gender equality: (i) countries selectively pursue gender equality, as evidenced by our finding that country VNRs demonstrated commitment to achieving only 31% of extant gender equality gaps;and (ii) countries are more committed to achieving gender equality on ‘practical’ dimensions (i.e., relating to basic needs, such as maternal health and education) than ‘strategic’ dimensions which seek to challenge unequal power relations and women's subordinate position within society (e.g., income, land, political power). Whether via refinements to the SDG/VNR process, or through well‐established gender platforms such as the World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Index and Equal Measures 2030 SDG Gender Index, gender equality advocates must push for pursuit of the entirety of the holistic gender equality agenda as hard‐fought for and agreed by the seminal Beijing Platform for Action. Without greater attention to strategic dimensions, women will be stuck in a vicious cycle of ‘empowerment without power’ and gender equality will elude women for yet another century.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy Y. Kim & Yoorim Bang & Eun Mee Kim, 2022. "Women’s Empowerment Without Power: Strategic v. Practical Interests in SDGs and the Voluntary National Reviews," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(3), pages 371-389, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:371-389
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13107
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gita Sen & Avanti Mukherjee, 2014. "No Empowerment without Rights, No Rights without Politics: Gender-equality, MDGs and the post-2015 Development Agenda," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2-3), pages 188-202, July.
    2. Moser, Caroline O. N., 1989. "Gender planning in the third world: Meeting practical and strategic gender needs," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 17(11), pages 1799-1825, November.
    3. Sakiko Fukuda-Parr & Alicia Ely Yamin & Joshua Greenstein, 2014. "The Power of Numbers: A Critical Review of Millennium Development Goal Targets for Human Development and Human Rights," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2-3), pages 105-117, July.
    4. Gita Sen, 2019. "Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment: Feminist Mobilization for the SDGs," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(S1), pages 28-38, January.
    5. Jeffrey D. Sachs & Guido Schmidt-Traub & Mariana Mazzucato & Dirk Messner & Nebojsa Nakicenovic & Johan Rockström, 2019. "Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 805-814, September.
    6. Truong, T.-D., 1997. "Gender and human development : a feminist perspective," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19000, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thor Olav Iversen, 2023. "Boundary experts: Science and politics in measuring the Sustainable Development Goals," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(4), pages 600-610, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Ibrahim Abbas & Ku Hasnita Binti Ku Samsu & Adlina Binti AB Halim & Mohammed Bashir Saidu, 2018. "Education Development Goals (EDGs) and Socio-economic Democratic Consolidation: Reflections on Regime¡¯s Mandates, Objectives, Agendas, and Targets in Yobe State, Nigeria," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 5(1), pages 128-147, January.
    2. Yamin, Alicia Ely & Bazile, Junior & Knight, Lucia & Molla, Mitike & Maistrellis, Emily & Leaning, Jennifer, 2015. "Tracing shadows: How gendered power relations shape the impacts of maternal death on living children in sub Saharan Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 143-150.
    3. Jiang, Kai & Xin, Baogui & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R., 2025. "Can industrial intelligence promote net-zero development? An analysis of resource dependence," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Topalli Margerita & Papavangjeli Meri & Ivanaj Silvester & Ferra Blerta, 2021. "The Impact of Foreign Direct Investments on Poverty Reduction in the Western Balkans," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 129-149, January.
    5. Lan Yang & Kathryn Cormican, 2021. "The Crossovers and Connectivity between Systems Engineering and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Scoping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Tom Henfrey & Giuseppe Feola & Gil Penha‐Lopes & Filka Sekulova & Ana Margarida Esteves, 2023. "Rethinking the sustainable development goals: Learning with and from community‐led initiatives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 211-222, February.
    7. Anke Schwittay, 2019. "Designing Urban Women’s Safety: An Empirical Study of Inclusive Innovation Through a Gender Transformation Lens," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(4), pages 836-854, September.
    8. Velasco-Herrejón, Paola & Bauwens, Thomas & Calisto Friant, Martin, 2022. "Challenging dominant sustainability worldviews on the energy transition: Lessons from Indigenous communities in Mexico and a plea for pluriversal technologies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Chi Zhang & Zhongchang Sun & Qiang Xing & Jialong Sun & Tianyu Xia & Hao Yu, 2021. "Localizing Indicators of SDG11 for an Integrated Assessment of Urban Sustainability—A Case Study of Hainan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Tilman, Andrew R. & Haight, Robert G., 2025. "Public policy for management of forest pests within an ownership mosaic," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    11. Ahmed, Khalid & Khan, Bareerah, 2024. "China's post-pandemic energy rebound and climate targets under the current regulations and green innovation capacity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    12. Margarita Garfias Royo & Elinor Parrott & Emily-Marie Pacheco & Imaduddin Ahmed & Ella Meilianda & Intan Kumala & Rina Suryani Oktari & Helene Joffe & Priti Parikh, 2022. "A Structured Review of Emotional Barriers to WASH Provision for Schoolgirls Post-Disaster," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Nuria Crespí-Lloréns & Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado & Elisa Chilet-Rosell, 2021. "Have Policies Tackled Gender Inequalities in Health? A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-12, January.
    14. repec:unu:wpaper:wp2012-02 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Sonika Redhu & Pragati Jain, 2024. "Unveiling the nexus between water scarcity and socioeconomic development in the water-scarce countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19557-19577, August.
    16. Ozili, Peterson K, 2023. "Central bank digital currency, poverty reduction and the United Nations sustainable development goals," MPRA Paper 117000, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Martina Jelinkova & Libena Tetrevova & Jan Vavra & Simona Munzarova, 2021. "The Sharing Economy in the Context of Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility: The Example of the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Jiaming Liang & Jiangtao Liu & Lisheng Guo & Wenhang Wang & Chengwei Wang & Weizhe Gao & Xiaoyu Guo & Yingluo He & Guohui Yang & Shuhei Yasuda & Bing Liang & Noritatsu Tsubaki, 2024. "CO2 hydrogenation over Fe-Co bimetallic catalysts with tunable selectivity through a graphene fencing approach," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Paul Bertheau & Robert Lindner, 2022. "Financing sustainable development? The role of foreign aid in Southeast Asia's energy transition," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 96-109, February.
    20. Jinghua Piao & Fang Zhang & Tianpei Ren & Fengli Xu & Jinglei Zhou & Jun Su & Peng Ru & Yong Li, 2025. "Polarization of public opinions on feminism in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    21. Ruth Cherrington & Marco Campenni & Danielle Farrow, 2026. "The Hidden Trade‐Offs in B Impact Assessment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 3044-3060, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:371-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.