IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v12y2021i1p51-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internet Fragmentation, Political Structuring, and Organizational Concentration in Transnational Engineering Networks

Author

Listed:
  • David Weyrauch
  • Thomas Winzen

Abstract

Is the internet at risk of fragmentation? Whereas the literature has examined this question with a focus on domestic policies, communication standards, and internet governance institutions, we analyze fragmentation and alternative outcomes in transnational engineering networks. These networks constitute the social foundations of the unified or ‘global’ internet. Our contributions include: (1) broadening the debate beyond fragmentation‐related network outcomes to include political structuring and organizational concentration; and (2) new evidence from an important engineering network around the Internet Engineering Task Force comprising thousands of participants and over four decades. Our analyses reveal fast and continuous network growth as well as clear signs of growing concentration of the network around a few major companies. A key implication is that, at the level of engineering networks, concerns about internet fragmentation might be unfounded and might distract from more salient developments such as organizational concentration.

Suggested Citation

  • David Weyrauch & Thomas Winzen, 2021. "Internet Fragmentation, Political Structuring, and Organizational Concentration in Transnational Engineering Networks," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 51-65, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:51-65
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12873
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Simcoe, 2012. "Standard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 305-336, February.
    2. John Naughton, 2016. "The evolution of the Internet: from military experiment to General Purpose Technology," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 5-28, January.
    3. Roxana Radu & Michael Hausding, 2020. "Consolidation in the DNS resolver market – how much, how fast, how dangerous?," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 46-64, July.
    4. Eva Claessen, 2020. "Reshaping the internet – the impact of the securitisation of internet infrastructure on approaches to internet governance: the case of Russia and the EU," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 140-157, July.
    5. Charles M. A. Clark, 2020. "Editor’s Introduction: Catholic Social Thought and Work," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(4), pages 1073-1084, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Engström, Emma & Strimling, Pontus, 2020. "Deep learning diffusion by infusion into preexisting technologies – Implications for users and society at large," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Gandal, Neil & Regibeau, Pierre, 2013. "SSOs: Current Policy Issues and Empirical Evidence," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275825, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Justus Baron & Jorge Contreras & Martin Husovec & Pierre Larouche, 2019. "Making the Rules: The Governance of Standard Development Organizations and their Policies on Intellectual Property Rights," JRC Research Reports JRC115004, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Balzer, Benjamin & Schneider, Johannes, 2021. "Persuading to participate: Coordination on a standard," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. A. B. Harutyunyan, 2021. "Armenia Towards a "New Economy": Defense Industry," Digital Transformation, Establishment "The Main Information and Analytical Center of the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus", issue 1.
    6. Talia Bar & Aija Leiponen, 2014. "Committee Composition and Networking in Standard Setting: The Case of Wireless Telecommunications," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine E. Tucker, 2015. "Standardization and the Effectiveness of Online Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(11), pages 2707-2719, November.
    8. Justus Baron & Daniel F. Spulber, 2018. "Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 462-503, September.
    9. Pierre Larouche & Florian Schuett, 2019. "Repeated interaction in standard setting," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 488-509, June.
    10. Freimuth, Claudia & Oelmann, Mark & Amann, Erwin, 2018. "Development and prospects of standardization in the German municipal wastewater sector: Version 1.0," IBES Diskussionsbeiträge 223, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of Business and Economic Studie (IBES).
    11. Goldberg, Mitchell & Schär, Fabian, 2023. "Metaverse governance: An empirical analysis of voting within Decentralized Autonomous Organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Avi Goldfarb & Daniel Trefler, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence and International Trade," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 463-492, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D'Haultfœuille, 2020. "Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(9), pages 2964-2996, September.
    14. Josh Lerner & Jean Tirole, 2015. "Standard-Essential Patents," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 123(3), pages 547-586.
    15. Liu, Xiaolu & Li, Honglin, 2016. "Ownership domination in standardization: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 225-241.
    16. Susan K. Cohen & Sean T. Hsu & Kristina B. Dahlin, 2016. "With Whom Do Technology Sponsors Partner During Technology Battles? Social Networking Strategies for Unproven (and Proven) Technologies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 846-872, August.
    17. Gravina, Antonio Francesco & Lanzafame, Matteo, 2021. "Finance, globalisation, technology and inequality: Do nonlinearities matter?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 96-110.
    18. Cesare Righi & Timothy Simcoe, 2020. "Patenting Inventions or Inventing Patents? Continuation Practice at the USPTO," NBER Working Papers 27686, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Serap Turkyilmaz & Erkut Altindað, 2022. "Analysis of Smart Home Systems in the Context of the Internet of Things in Terms of Consumer Experience," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 19-31.
    20. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation," NBER Working Papers 24358, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:51-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.