IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v11y2020i4p458-465.html

Understanding Film Co‐Production in the Era of Globalization: A Value Chain Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jimmyn Parc

Abstract

The film industry is closely linked to the nation’s culture and economy. With globalization, however, it has become more engaged in international operations through film co‐production. Paradoxically, this instrument emerged as a type of discriminatory measure as well as reflected growing interest in regionalism, notably among European countries facing the dominance of US films. To strengthen this scheme, state subsidies have been widely offered, which has led to it being positively adopted in Europe and beyond. Given this political context, the double‐facet of co‐production should be carefully understood when this scheme is implemented to promote the film industry. In this regard, it is important to understand clearly how co‐production functions and crucially its real impact on the film industry. This paper reveals that in contrast to the common perception, co‐production leads easily to cultural paucity, rather than cultural diversity across various aspects. Additionally, subsidies to promote co‐production distort it further and make it easier to be exploited. Therefore, such a consideration should be taken into account when redesigning the co‐production scheme if governments wish to help promote the national film industry and cultural diversity in the era of globalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimmyn Parc, 2020. "Understanding Film Co‐Production in the Era of Globalization: A Value Chain Approach," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(4), pages 458-465, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:458-465
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12830
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jehoshua Eliashberg & Anita Elberse & Mark A.A.M. Leenders, 2006. "The Motion Picture Industry: Critical Issues in Practice, Current Research, and New Research Directions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 638-661, 11-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leonardo Perini & Enrico Bertacchini & Roberto Zanola, 2025. "The Italian Cinema Under the Shadow of Censorship: An empirical investigation of post-fascism period," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-05-2025, Association for Cultural Economics International.
    2. Feng Yu & Ning Li & Jing Yan & Yan Zhang, 2025. "The Spillover Effects of International Co‐production in the Chinese Film Industry," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 33(1), pages 101-131, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ponnamma Divakaran, Pradeep Kumar, 2018. "Technology-enabled community data for gaining pre-release brand insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 217-226.
    2. Hideshi Itoh & Hodaka Morita, 2015. "Formal Contracts, Relational Contracts, and the Threat-Point Effect," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 318-346, August.
    3. Sumit Raut & Sanjeev Swami & Eunkyu Lee & Charles B. Weinberg, 2008. "How Complex Do Movie Channel Contracts Need to Be?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 627-641, 07-08.
    4. Michael Lewis & Yeujun Yoon, 2018. "An Empirical Examination of the Development and Impact of Star Power in Major League Baseball," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 19(2), pages 155-187, February.
    5. Angela (Xia) Liu & Tridib Mazumdar & Bo Li, 2015. "Counterfactual Decomposition of Movie Star Effects with Star Selection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(7), pages 1704-1721, July.
    6. Jo, Jee Hyung & Lee, Jong Hee & Cho, Shin, 2020. "The characteristics of videos on demand for television programs and the determinants of their viewing patterns: Evidence from the Korean IPTV market," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8).
    7. McKenzie, Jordi, 2013. "Predicting box office with and without markets: Do internet users know anything?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 70-80.
    8. Beck, Jonathan, 2008. "Diderot´s rule," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Competition and Innovation SP II 2008-13, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    9. Rustam Ibragimov & Johan Walden, 2010. "Optimal Bundling Strategies Under Heavy-Tailed Valuations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(11), pages 1963-1976, November.
    10. Wei, Liyuan & Yang, Yupin, 2022. "An empirical investigation of director selection in movie preproduction: A two-sided matching approach," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 888-906.
    11. A. Yeşim Orhun & Sriram Venkataraman & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2016. "Impact of Competition on Product Decisions: Movie Choices of Exhibitors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 73-92, January.
    12. Xinli Huang & Di Fan & Christine Soo, 2025. "A social influence view of the internationalization of cultural products," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 56(8), pages 990-1009, October.
    13. Liyuan Wei, 2006. "—Making Sense of These Million-Dollar Babies—Rationale Behind Superstar Profit Participation Contracts," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 678-680, 11-12.
    14. Ohio University & Department of Economics & Hailey Hayeon Joo, 2009. "Social Learning and Optimal Advertising in the Motion Picture Industry," 2009 Meeting Papers 513, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    15. Wijiharjono, Nuryadi, 2017. "Kajian perkembangan penelitian pemasaran film [Contemporary study of film marketing research]," MPRA Paper 83349, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2017.
    16. Stefan Stremersch & Jorge Gonzalez & Albert Valenti & Julian Villanueva, 2023. "The value of context-specific studies for marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 50-65, January.
    17. Legoux, Renaud & Larocque, Denis & Laporte, Sandra & Belmati, Soraya & Boquet, Thomas, 2016. "The effect of critical reviews on exhibitors' decisions: Do reviews affect the survival of a movie on screen?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 357-374.
    18. Lorenzen, Mark & Täube, Florian Arun, 2008. "Breakout from Bollywood? The roles of social networks and regulation in the evolution of Indian film industry," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 286-299, September.
    19. Clement, Michel & Wu, Steven & Fischer, Marc, 2014. "Empirical generalizations of demand and supply dynamics for movies," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 207-223.
    20. Venkat Kuppuswamy & Peter Younkin, 2020. "Testing the Theory of Consumer Discrimination as an Explanation for the Lack of Minority Hiring in Hollywood Films," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1227-1247, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:458-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.