IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v61y2026i1p279-303.html

Market Discipline in the Presence of Price Opacity, Product Complexity, and Guaranty Fund Coverage for Life Insurers

Author

Listed:
  • James M. Carson,
  • David L. Eckles,
  • Po‐Lin Wang

Abstract

While the presence of deposit insurance from the FDIC is promoted in the banking sector, advertising the existence of similar protection provided via state guaranty funds in the insurance industry is prohibited. With respect to life insurance, such prohibition may stem from concerns over the potential for reduced market discipline in a market characterized by substantial price opacity and product complexity where market discipline already may be limited. We review the theoretical framework of market discipline in relation to insurance guaranty funds and empirically test for the existence of market discipline in the life insurance market. Based on two measures of firm risk, we find almost no evidence of a relationship between insurer risk and life insurance price (and limited evidence of market discipline based on life insurance quantity demanded). Our evidence suggests that market discipline is relatively weak in the life insurance industry, and further that guaranty funds lead to government‐induced moral hazard, further weakening market discipline in life insurance. Our results help explain the existence of prohibitions against advertising the coverage provided by state insurance guaranty funds.

Suggested Citation

  • James M. Carson, & David L. Eckles, & Po‐Lin Wang, 2026. "Market Discipline in the Presence of Price Opacity, Product Complexity, and Guaranty Fund Coverage for Life Insurers," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 61(1), pages 279-303, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:61:y:2026:i:1:p:279-303
    DOI: 10.1111/fire.70019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.70019
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fire.70019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:61:y:2026:i:1:p:279-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.