IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v31y1996i1p67-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Illegal Business Practice on Shareholder Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Reichert, Alan K
  • Lockett, Michael
  • Rao, Ramesh P

Abstract

Data regarding illegal firm behavior were obtained for the period 1980-1990. Using the single index market model, the study finds that public announcements of indictments for major corporate crimes have a significant and long-term negative impact upon shareholder wealth, particularly for firms found guilty of the indictment. The results indicate that indictments of larger firms have a proportionally smaller impact on excess returns. Furthermore, indictments handed down since the Levine/Boesky scandal appear to have had a more adverse impact. Copyright 1996 by MIT Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Reichert, Alan K & Lockett, Michael & Rao, Ramesh P, 1996. "The Impact of Illegal Business Practice on Shareholder Returns," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 31(1), pages 67-85, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:31:y:1996:i:1:p:67-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter-Jan Engelen, 2011. "Legal versus Reputational Penalties in Deterring Corporate Misconduct," Chapters, in: Mehmet Ugur & David Sunderland (ed.), Does Economic Governance Matter?, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Malay Biswas, 2017. "Are They Efficient in the Middle? Using Propensity Score Estimation for Modeling Middlemen in Indian Corporate Corruption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 563-586, March.
    3. Aigbe Akhigbe & Bhanu Balasubramnian & Ann Marie Whyte, 2020. "Foreign Exchange Manipulation and the Equity Returns of Global Banks," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 57(2), pages 207-230, April.
    4. Gillet, Roland & Hübner, Georges & Plunus, Séverine, 2010. "Operational risk and reputation in the financial industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 224-235, January.
    5. Akhtar, Shumi & Akhtar, Farida & John, Kose & Wong, Su-Wen, 2019. "Multinationals' tax evasion: A financial and governance perspective," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 35-62.
    6. Haunschild, Pamela & Page, Karen & Sullivan, Billian Ni, 2000. "Organizations Non-gratae? The Impact of Unethical Corporate Behavior On Interorganizational Networks," Research Papers 1623, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    7. Bilian Ni Sullivan & Pamela Haunschild & Karen Page, 2007. "Organizations Non Gratae? The Impact of Unethical Corporate Acts on Interorganizational Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 55-70, February.
    8. Lucy Sojung Lee & Weiguo Zhong, 2020. "Responses to alliance partners’ misbehavior and firm performance in China: the moderating roles of Guanxi orientation," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 344-378, July.
    9. Zahid Iqbal & Kun Wang & Sewon O, 2011. "Board independence and market reactions around news of stock option backdating," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 35(1), pages 104-115, January.
    10. Nadine Gatzert & Joan T. Schmit & Andreas Kolb, 2016. "Assessing the Risks of Insuring Reputation Risk," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 83(3), pages 641-679, September.
    11. Mohamad Zeidan, 2013. "Effects of Illegal Behavior on the Financial Performance of US Banking Institutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 313-324, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:31:y:1996:i:1:p:67-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.