IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v37y2025i1p169-200.html

The impact of comment letters on audit fees: Evidence from spillover effect

Author

Listed:
  • Wuqing Wu
  • Huixuan Zhang
  • Yuan George Shan

Abstract

This study examines whether comment letters have spillover effects on audit fees. By examining listed companies in China, we find that the frequency of comment letters received by peer firms is positively associated with focal firms' audit fees. The spillover effect is stronger when companies have the same audit firm as their peers and the comment letter is longer, asks more questions, is more negative, or contains more risk information. Furthermore, the effect is more pronounced (weaker) for companies with higher growth (audited by Big Four audit firms). Our findings suggest that comment letters have regulatory effectiveness, which influences companies' and auditors' behavior on a large scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Wuqing Wu & Huixuan Zhang & Yuan George Shan, 2025. "The impact of comment letters on audit fees: Evidence from spillover effect," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 169-200, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:37:y:2025:i:1:p:169-200
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12314
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.12314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craswell, Allen & Stokes, Donald J. & Laughton, Janet, 2002. "Auditor independence and fee dependence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 253-275, June.
    2. Pyo, Youngin & Lustgarten, Steven, 1990. "Differential intra-industry information transfer associated with management earnings forecasts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 365-379, December.
    3. Cao, Viet Nga & Pham, Anh Viet, 2021. "Behavioral spillover between firms with shared auditors: The monitoring role of capital market investors," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Jonathan M. Karpoff & D. Scott Lee & Gerald S. Martin, 2014. "The Consequences to Managers for Financial Misrepresentation," Springer Books, in: Roberto Pietra & Stuart McLeay & Joshua Ronen (ed.), Accounting and Regulation, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 339-375, Springer.
    5. Jong†Hag Choi & Jeong†Bon Kim & Xiaohong Liu & Dan A. Simunic, 2008. "Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4 Premiums: Theory and Cross†country Evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 55-99, March.
    6. James P. Ryans, 2021. "Textual classification of SEC comment letters," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 37-80, March.
    7. Simunic, Da, 1980. "The Pricing Of Audit Services - Theory And Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 161-190.
    8. Wang, Qijian & Zhou, Kaiguo, 2022. "Common ownership and the spillover effect of market reaction: Evidence from stock exchange comment letters," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    9. Leventis, Stergios, 2018. "An empirical test of SEC enforcement in the audit market," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 106-116.
    10. Jaggi, Bikki & Low, Pek Yee, 2011. "Joint Effect of Investor Protection and Securities Regulations on Audit Fees," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 241-270, September.
    11. Sharad Asthana & Steven Balsam & Sungsoo Kim, 2009. "The effect of Enron, Andersen, and Sarbanes‐Oxley on the US market for audit services," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(1), pages 4-26, July.
    12. Seetharaman, Ananth & Gul, Ferdinand A. & Lynn, Stephen G., 2002. "Litigation risk and audit fees: evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 91-115, February.
    13. Heese, Jonas & Khan, Mozaffar & Ramanna, Karthik, 2017. "Is the SEC captured? Evidence from comment-letter reviews," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 98-122.
    14. Lauren M. Cunningham & Bret A. Johnson & E. Scott Johnson & Ling Lei Lisic, 2020. "The Switch‐Up: An Examination of Changes in Earnings Management after Receiving SEC Comment Letters†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 917-944, June.
    15. Freeman, Robert & Tse, Senyo, 1992. "An earnings prediction approach to examining intercompany information transfers," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 509-523, December.
    16. Stephen V. Brown & Xiaoli (Shaolee) Tian & Jennifer Wu Tucker, 2018. "The Spillover Effect of SEC Comment Letters on Qualitative Corporate Disclosure: Evidence from the Risk Factor Disclosure," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 622-656, June.
    17. Jones Heese & Mozaffar Khan & Karthik Ramanna, 2017. "Is the SEC Captured? Evidence from Comment-Letter Reviews," Harvard Business School Working Papers 17-087, Harvard Business School.
    18. Fan Yang & Jiayu Huang & Yongbin Cai, 2022. "Tone of Textual Information in Annual Reports and Regulatory Inquiry Letters: Data from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 417-427, January.
    19. Sharad Asthana & Steven Balsam & Sungsoo Kim, 2009. "The effect of Enron, Andersen, and Sarbanes‐Oxley on the US market for audit services," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(1), pages 4-26, July.
    20. Jingru Hou & Xin Shi & Ran Tao, 2023. "Exchange Comment Letters and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(4), pages 1140-1160, March.
    21. David A. Reppenhagen, 2010. "Contagion of accounting methods: evidence from stock option expensing," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 629-657, September.
    22. Rick Johnston & Reining Petacchi, 2017. "Regulatory Oversight of Financial Reporting: Securities and Exchange Commission Comment Letters," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 1128-1155, June.
    23. Miles B. Gietzmann & Angela K. Pettinicchio, 2014. "External Auditor Reassessment of Client Business Risk Following the Issuance of a Comment Letter by the SEC," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 57-85, May.
    24. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    25. Hong, Yun & Yao, Youfu, 2024. "Can comment letters impact excess perks? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    26. Pierangelo Rosati & Fabian Gogolin & Theo Lynn, 2019. "Audit Firm Assessments of Cyber-Security Risk: Evidence from Audit Fees and SEC Comment Letters," The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 54(03), pages 1-56, September.
    27. Wanyi Chen & Ning Hu & Xiangfang Zhao, 2022. "Information asymmetry, regulatory inquiry, and company mergers and acquisitions: evidence from Shenzhen Stock Exchange comment letters," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2497-2542, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiaqi Ning & Hui Liu & Ming Jia, 2025. "Spillover Effects of Comment Letters and Risk Management Role of ESG Performance: From the Perspective of Common Auditors," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(4), pages 3946-3965, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weidong Zhang & Hongrui Zheng & Jenny Jing Wang & Zihuang Chen & Zhenghan Luo, 2025. "Inquiry letter types, accountants' responses, and audit fees: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(2), pages 1753-1785, June.
    2. Han, Mengrui & Ying, Qianwei & Huang, Li, 2023. "Firms’ delayed replies and investor confidence: Evidence from M&A comment letters in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Wan, Liangyong & Li, Chen & Xu, Rui & Zhang, Hao, 2024. "Mergers and acquisitions comment letters and analysts' earnings forecasts: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Hong, Yun & Yao, Youfu, 2024. "Can comment letters impact excess perks? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Xiong, Jiacai & Yang, Zelin & Wang, Qing Sophie, 2025. "Can non-punitive regulation curb corporate greenwashing?Evidence from a word embedding model," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Xunan Feng & Dengxi Wei, 2024. "Political ranking in hierarchy and receipt of a comment letter: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 277-307, March.
    7. Koulikidou, Kleopatra & Chantziaras, Antonios & Dedoulis, Emmanouil & Leventis, Stergios, 2023. "Regulatory enforcement, foreignness, and language negativity: Evidence from SEC comment letters," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    8. Chantziaras, Antonios & Koulikidou, Kleopatra & Leventis, Stergios, 2021. "The power of words in capital markets: SEC comment letters on foreign issuers and the impact of home country enforcement," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    9. Dang, Man & Puwanenthiren, Premkanth & Truong, Cameron & Henry, Darren & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Audit quality and seasoned equity offerings methods," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Gu, Qiankun & Li, Conggang & Li, Yanyin & Xu, Rong & Xu, Yize, 2025. "Does non-punitive regulation increase the demand for D&O insurance?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Christensen, Brant & Schmardebeck, Roy & Seidel, Timothy, 2022. "Do auditors’ incentives affect materiality assessments of prior-period misstatements?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Yang Xu & Elizabeth Carson & Neil Fargher & Liwei Jiang, 2013. "Responses by Australian auditors to the global financial crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(1), pages 301-338, March.
    13. Wu, Xiting & Ying, Sammy Xiaoyan & You, Jiaxing & Wu, Xiaochun & Wu, Huiying, 2026. "The effect of big data-driven tax enforcement on audit pricing: Evidence from China," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(1).
    14. Li, Xin & Tong, Yan & Xu, Guoquan, 2025. "Corporate ESG disclosure and regulatory inquiry: Evidence from comment letters on annual reports," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    15. Zhang, Xueying & Bian, Haodong & Walker, Thomas & Barabanov, Sergey, 2025. "The impact of financial report comment letters on bond pricing: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PC).
    16. Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Georgios Loukopoulos & Panagiotis Loukopoulos & Geoffrey Wood, 2024. "Corporate Political Activities and the SEC's Oversight Role in the IPO Process," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 375-412, March.
    17. Liwei Shan & Albert Tsang & Xiaoxue Zhang, 2024. "Transporting Audit Quality Across Countries: Returnee CEOs and Audit Fees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(4), pages 845-874, July.
    18. Bret A. Johnson & Ling Lei Lisic & Joon Seok Moon & Mengmeng Wang, 2023. "SEC comment letters on form S-4 and M&A accounting quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 862-909, June.
    19. James P. Ryans, 2021. "Textual classification of SEC comment letters," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 37-80, March.
    20. Ormazabal, Gaizka, 2018. "The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research," CEPR Discussion Papers 12775, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:37:y:2025:i:1:p:169-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.