IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/chinae/v28y2020i2p84-112.html

European versus American Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Madi Sarsenbayev
  • Nicolas Véron

Abstract

China has started to deploy its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the European Union (EU), and the EU in turn has regional and global interests that intersect with the BRI's scope. Subject to future adjustments of China's BRI strategy, the initiative's potential contribution to the EU requirements for infrastructure development could be significant, even though its modalities in the EU are inevitably different from those in countries that are poorer or have more difficult financial market access. The EU's attitude to the BRI, however, has not yet fully coalesced. Despite superficial similarities in public discourses, the EU has a profoundly distinct perspective from that of the US on the BRI, and more generally on the rise of China and its growing global influence. For the EU, the BRI generates challenges but also potential benefits. The EU should improve its ability to welcome sensible BRI projects, including through the adoption of greater reform of screening frameworks for foreign direct investment. More generally, the EU should enhance its ability to define policies independent of the US on China and the challenges resulting from China's rise. China should also make further efforts to foster a constructive relationship with the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Madi Sarsenbayev & Nicolas Véron, 2020. "European versus American Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(2), pages 84-112, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:chinae:v:28:y:2020:i:2:p:84-112
    DOI: 10.1111/cwe.12322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12322
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/cwe.12322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guntram B. Wolff & Uri Dadush, 2019. "The European Union’s response to the trade crisis," Bruegel Policy Contributions 29820, Bruegel.
    2. André Sapir, . "Fragmented power- Europe and the global economy," Bruegel Book, Bruegel, number 54.
    3. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, 2020. "Chinese Investment in the US and the EU is Declining –for Similar Reasons," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(2), pages 59-83, March.
    4. Jeromin Zettelmeyer, 2019. "The Return of Economic Nationalism in Germany," Policy Briefs PB19-4, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    5. Nicholas R. Lardy, 2019. "The State Strikes Back: The End of Economic Reform in China?," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 7373, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sidong Zhao & Yiran Yan & Jing Han, 2021. "Industrial Land Change in Chinese Silk Road Cities and Its Influence on Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Jian Chen & Xiao-qin Dong & Wei Li & Di Zhao, 2025. "Third-country investment effects of the belt and road initiative: evidence from China’s overseas direct investment," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 951-978, August.
    3. Schulhof, Vera & van Vuuren, Detlef & Kirchherr, Julian, 2022. "The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): What Will it Look Like in the Future?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio Terzi & Monika Sherwood & Aneil Singh, 2023. "European industrial policy for the green and digital revolution," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(5), pages 842-857.
    2. Mingtang Liu, 2024. "Amplified State Capitalism in China: Overproduction, Industrial Policy and Statist Controversies," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(2), pages 191-218, March.
    3. Francesco Macheda, 2020. "Il ruolo delle imprese a conduzione statale nella lotta della Cina contro il COVID-19 (The role of State-Owned Enterprises in China's fight against the coronavirus disease)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 73(290), pages 111-139.
    4. Loren Brandt & Gueorgui Kambourov & Kjetil Storesletten, 2026. "Barriers to Entry and Regional Economic Growth in China," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 93(1), pages 286-326.
    5. Dahlström, Petter & Lööf, Hans & Sjöholm, Fredrik & Stephan, Andreas, 2023. "The EU’s competitive advantage in the "clean-energy arms race"," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 495, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    6. Lin Chuan & Stavros Sindakis & Panagiotis Theodorou, 2024. "Examining the Impact of Political Stability on Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8179-8208, June.
    7. Philip Andrews-Speed, 2024. "The story of coal in China: from ornaments to critical energy supply," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 37(2), pages 331-342, June.
    8. Mathias Lund Larsen, 2023. "Bottom-up market-facilitation and top-down market-steering: comparing and conceptualizing green finance approaches in the EU and China," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 61-80, March.
    9. Matthew Higgins, 2020. "China's Growth Outlook: Is High-Income Status in Reach?," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 26(4), pages 69-97, October.
    10. Barry Eichengreen, 2009. "From the Asian crisis to the global credit crisis: reforming the international financial architecture redux," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Chin‐Yoong Wong & Yoke‐Kee Eng, 2022. "Renminbi Appreciation and China's Industrial Upgrading," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(3), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Henrik Horn & Petros C. Mavroidis & André Sapir, 2010. "Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(11), pages 1565-1588, November.
    13. Anabel González & Nicolas Véron, 2019. "EU trade policy amid the China-US clash- caught in the crossfire?," Bruegel Working Papers 32427, Bruegel.
    14. Sean Kenji Starrs & Julian Germann, 2021. "Responding to the China Challenge in Techno‐nationalism: Divergence between Germany and the United States," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(5), pages 1122-1146, September.
    15. Lenz, Fulko, 2020. "Europa im Systemwettbewerb mit China: Trugschlüsse, Schutzinstrumente und offensive Antworten," Argumente zur Marktwirtschaft und Politik 150, Stiftung Marktwirtschaft / The Market Economy Foundation, Berlin.
    16. Budzinski, Oliver & Stöhr, Annika, 2019. "Public interest considerations in European merger control regimes," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 130, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    17. António Afonso & Maria João Guedes & Pankaj C. Patel, 2021. "Labour Productivity in State-Owned Enterprises," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 63(3), pages 450-465, September.
    18. Fredrik Sjöholm, 2024. "Navigating the New Normal: The European Union's Changing Stance on Globalization in the Era of Trade Conflicts," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 23(1), pages 29-45, Winter/Sp.
    19. Sjöholm, Fredrik, 2023. "The Return of Borders in the World Economy: An EU-Perspective," Working Paper Series 1469, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    20. Li, Daniel Z. & Li, Zeren & Zhang, Qi, 2023. "Public investment as downward benefit distribution: Theory and evidence from China’s public–private partnership programs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 103-128.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:chinae:v:28:y:2020:i:2:p:84-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwepacn.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.