IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i8p10903-10924.html

The Importance of the Eco‐Innovation, Knowledge Network and the Geographical Dimension in the Adoption of Circular Economy Business Models

Author

Listed:
  • Ángela Triguero
  • Lourdes Moreno‐Mondéjar
  • David Córcoles

Abstract

Adopting circular economy (CE) business models is strategically complex due to the diversity and complementarity of CE practices across the value chain. This study examines how eco‐innovation, open innovation and geographical proximity condition the adoption of four CE practices—eco‐design, circular inputs, life cycle assessment (LCA) and end‐of‐life strategies—using survey data from 300 Spanish firms and a multivariate probit model. Our findings reveal that CE practices are interdependent, making it essential to identify which combinations are most effective under specific strategic conditions. Upstream practices such as eco‐design, circular inputs and LCA require strong eco‐innovation capabilities, while downstream practices benefit from broad external collaboration networks, highlighting the role of open innovation. Additionally, local geographical orientation is crucial for eco‐design and LCA, suggesting that proximity facilitates implementation. In contrast, international entrepreneurial orientation supports most CE practices except eco‐design. These insights guide firms in tailoring CE strategies and inform targeted policy interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ángela Triguero & Lourdes Moreno‐Mondéjar & David Córcoles, 2025. "The Importance of the Eco‐Innovation, Knowledge Network and the Geographical Dimension in the Adoption of Circular Economy Business Models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10903-10924, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10903-10924
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70158
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nabila Arfaoui & Sébastien Bourdin & André Torre & Marie-France Vernier & Linh-Chi Vo, 2024. "Geographical and organised proximities influencing circular economy practices: the closer partners, the better?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(12), pages 2485-2500, December.
    2. Vasileiou, Efi & Georgantzis, Nikolaos & Attanasi, Giuseppe & Llerena, Patrick, 2022. "Green innovation and financial performance: A study on Italian firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    3. Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu & Radian Belu & Alin Artene, 2021. "Accentuating the interconnection between business sustainability and organizational performance in the context of the circular economy: The moderating role of organizational competitiveness," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2108-2118, May.
    4. Roberta Angelis, 2022. "Circular Economy Business Models: a Repertoire of Theoretical Relationships and a Research Agenda," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 433-446, June.
    5. Diaz Lopez, Fernando J. & Bastein, Ton & Tukker, Arnold, 2019. "Business Model Innovation for Resource-efficiency, Circularity and Cleaner Production: What 143 Cases Tell Us," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 20-35.
    6. Caroline Mothe & Uyen T. Nguyen-Thi & Ángela Triguero, 2018. "Innovative products and services with environmental benefits: design of search strategies for external knowledge and absorptive capacity," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(11), pages 1934-1954, September.
    7. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    8. Marcel C. Hollander & Conny A. Bakker & Erik Jan Hultink, 2017. "Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 517-525, June.
    9. Giovanni Abramo & Francesca Apponi & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, 2022. "The geographic proximity effect on domestic cross-sector vis-à-vis intra-sector research collaborations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3505-3521, June.
    10. Agnieszka D. Hunka & Marcus Linder & Shiva Habibi, 2021. "Determinants of consumer demand for circular economy products. A case for reuse and remanufacturing for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 535-550, January.
    11. Giovanni Abramo & Francesca Apponi & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, 2022. "The geographic proximity effect on domestic cross-sector vis-a-vis intra-sector research collaborations," Papers 2202.10347, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Abramo & Francesca Apponi & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, 2024. "The moderating role of the territorial research infrastructure on the geographic proximity effect in research collaborations: a regional-based view," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(6), pages 3149-3168, June.
    2. Simone Franzò & Andrea Urbinati & Davide Chiaroni & Vittorio Chiesa, 2021. "Unravelling the design process of business models from linear to circular: An empirical investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2758-2772, September.
    3. Christoph Ratay & Fabian Barthel & Alwine Mohnen, 2024. "Geographic network effects in a circular economy: A field data analysis of reusable packaging services," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 482-495, June.
    4. Shamaila Ishaq & Umair Tanveer & Thinh Gia Hoang & Stefan Seuring, 2026. "Circular Design Strategies Unleashed: Competitiveness and the Journey Towards Circular Manufacturing Businesses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 6998-7017, July.
    5. Li, Jing & Yu, Qian, 2024. "Scientists’ disciplinary characteristics and collaboration behaviour under the convergence paradigm: A multilevel network perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    6. Adrián Rabadán & Ángela Triguero & Ángela Gonzalez-Moreno, 2020. "Cooperation as the Secret Ingredient in the Recipe to Foster Internal Technological Eco-Innovation in the Agri-Food Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    7. M. Damiani & Fabrizio Pompei & Andrea Ricci, 2025. "Green Transition and Industrial Relations at the Workplace: Evidence From Italian Firms," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(2), pages 323-340, June.
    8. Mengyuan Zhou, 2022. "Does the Source of Inheritance Matter in Bequest Attitudes? Evidence from Japan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 867-887, December.
    9. Campbell, Randall C. & Nagel, Gregory L., 2016. "Private information and limitations of Heckman's estimator in banking and corporate finance research," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 186-195.
    10. Christopher Dick-Sagoe & Ernest Ngeh Tingum & Peter Asare-Nuamah & Denis N. Yuni & Nicholas Baidoo, 2025. "Central transfers and incentives to collect local revenue among the Central Region of Ghana’s local government officials: analysing the flypaper effect," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Ilona Babenko & Benjamin Bennett & John M Bizjak & Jeffrey L Coles & Jason J Sandvik, 2023. "Clawback Provisions and Firm Risk," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 191-239.
    12. Şahan, Duygu & Tuna, Okan, 2018. "Environmental innovation of transportation sector in OECD countries," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), The Road to a Digitalized Supply Chain Management: Smart and Digital Solutions for Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International C, volume 25, pages 157-170, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    13. Ruomeng Cui & Dennis J. Zhang & Achal Bassamboo, 2019. "Learning from Inventory Availability Information: Evidence from Field Experiments on Amazon," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1216-1235, March.
    14. Luiz Paulo Fávero & Joseph F. Hair & Rafael de Freitas Souza & Matheus Albergaria & Talles V. Brugni, 2021. "Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Better Way to Understand Data Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, May.
    15. Shaikh M. S. U. Eskander & Sam Fankhauser, 2022. "Income Diversification and Income Inequality: Household Responses to the 2013 Floods in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Meng, Chang & Ghafoori, Noorulhaq, 2024. "The economic impact of terrorism in South Asia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Hwang, Yujung & Nguyen, Toan, 2025. "Is sex ratio a valid distribution factor in a collective model?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Peter Harasztosi & Attila Lindner, 2019. "Who Pays for the Minimum Wage?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2693-2727, August.
    19. Jinwon Kim & Jucheol Moon & Dongyun Yang, 2024. "Pigouvian Congestion Tolls and the Welfare Gain: Estimates for California Freeways," Working Papers 2402, Nam Duck-Woo Economic Research Institute, Sogang University (Former Research Institute for Market Economy).
    20. Cho, Seong-Hoon & Kim, Heeho & Roberts, Roland K. & Kim, Taeyoung & Lee, Daegoon, 2014. "Effects of changes in forestland ownership on deforestation and urbanization and the resulting effects on greenhouse gas emissions," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 93-109.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10903-10924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.