IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i1p116-128.html

Sustainability‐based value creation within a multi‐stakeholder network: Balancing expectation conflicts within the Amazon context

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Nobre Dias
  • Kavita Miadaira Hamza
  • Annouk Lievens
  • Ingrid Moons

Abstract

The current paper reports on ways to better co‐create sustainability‐based value in multi‐stakeholder networks by focusing on stakeholder expectations, their resulting conflicts, and feasible interventions. Indeed, the literature review reveals a growing research focus on multi‐stakeholder networks involving non‐governmental organizations, traditional communities, and companies operating in vulnerable natural environments. This research interest is driven by the growing need for forest preservation and its impact on creating a more sustainable ecosystem. Our study uses the case of Origens Brasil, a multi‐stakeholder network promoting ethical trade and protection of the Amazon Forest, and involves 47 interviews, and observational data. We contribute by identifying stakeholder expectations and shedding light on the unique conflicts that emerge from differences in these expectations. Furthermore, we developed a framework for sustainability‐based value creation derived from expectation conflict intervening.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Nobre Dias & Kavita Miadaira Hamza & Annouk Lievens & Ingrid Moons, 2025. "Sustainability‐based value creation within a multi‐stakeholder network: Balancing expectation conflicts within the Amazon context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 116-128, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:116-128
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3981
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bram Roosens & Nathalie Dens & Annouk Lievens, 2019. "Effects Of Partners’ Communications On Consumer Perceptions Of Joint Innovation Efforts," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(08), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Fabien Martinez, 2023. "Exploring the syncretic dynamics involved in dyadic business–NGO partnerships," Post-Print hal-03926303, HAL.
    3. Denise Fischer & Malte Brettel & René Mauer, 2020. "The Three Dimensions of Sustainability: A Delicate Balancing Act for Entrepreneurs Made More Complex by Stakeholder Expectations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 87-106, April.
    4. Steve Evans & Doroteya Vladimirova & Maria Holgado & Kirsten Van Fossen & Miying Yang & Elisabete A. Silva & Claire Y. Barlow, 2017. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 597-608, July.
    5. Elco Burg & Hans Berends & Erik M. Raaij, 2014. "Framing and Interorganizational Knowledge Transfer: A Process Study of Collaborative Innovation in the Aircraft Industry," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 349-378, May.
    6. Hötte, Kerstin, 2023. "Demand-pull, technology-push, and the direction of technological change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    7. Priyabrata Chowdhury & Rezaul Shumon, 2020. "Minimizing the Gap between Expectation and Ability: Strategies for SMEs to Implement Social Sustainability Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Yousuf Kamal, 2021. "Stakeholders expectations for CSR-related corporate governance disclosure: evidence from a developing country," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(2), pages 97-127, January.
    9. Lutz Preuss & Isabel Fischer & Bimal Arora, 2024. "How do stakeholder groups make sense of sustainability: Analysing differences in the complexity of their cognitive frames," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2367-2383, March.
    10. Marcelo Elias & Lara Bartocci Liboni & Luciana O. Cezarino & Flavio Pinheiro Martins & Márcio Lopes Pimenta & Per Hilletofth & Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2022. "Shedding Light on the Brazilian Amazon Biotrade: A Study on Sustainable Development in Native Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Nuñez-Jimenez, Alejandro & Knoeri, Christof & Hoppmann, Joern & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2022. "Beyond innovation and deployment: Modeling the impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies in Germany's solar policy mix," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    12. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Ivanova, Maria & Torkkeli, Lasse, 2013. "Managerial sensemaking of interaction within business relationships: A cultural perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 717-727.
    14. Fabien Martinez, 2023. "Exploring the syncretic dynamics involved in dyadic business–NGO partnerships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4068-4083, November.
    15. Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo & Michele Rubino & Antonello Garzoni, 2019. "How pressure from stakeholders affects integrated reporting quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1591-1606, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karolina Bähr & Alexander Fliaster, 2023. "The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents' value propositions for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 920-935, February.
    2. Paolo Esposito & Arcangelo Marrone & Vincenzo Pontrelli & Angela Rella, 2025. "Exploring drivers and factors of benefit impact reports quality: Retracing a stakeholder theory approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 555-569, January.
    3. Bassart-i-Loré, Miquel, 2026. "Mixing innovation policies for low-carbon transitions? An agent-based approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Gandra de Carvalho, Ana Catarina & Cassânego, Vitor Melão & Moralles, Herick Fernando & de Mattos Nascimento, Daniel Luiz, 2026. "From collaboration to capability: The role of NGO partnerships in enhancing operational environmental management," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Antonella Zucchella & Pietro Previtali & Roger Strange, 2022. "Proactive and reactive views in the transition towards circular business models. A grounded study in the plastic packaging industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1073-1102, September.
    6. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Ricardo Jorge Raimundo & Sandra P. Cruz, 2022. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Juntunen, Jouni K. & Shakeel, Shah Rukh, 2026. "Contextualizing policy mixes – A configurational study on rapid transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    8. Pizzichini, L. & Sabatini, A. & Gregori, G.L. & Cillo, V. & Sasso, P., 2025. "Digital servitisation for sustainable business model innovation in the automotive industry: The empirical perspective of a car dealer," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Kazuyuki MOTOHASHI & Qiuhan ZHAO, 2023. "University as a Knowledge Source of Innovation: A spatial analysis of the impact on local high-tech startup creation," Discussion papers 23027, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    10. Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla & Valentina Minutiello & Arcangelo Marrone & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2022. "Readability of integrated reports: Evidence from worldwide adopters," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 524-534, May.
    11. María E. Aguilar-Fernández & José Ramon Otegi-Olaso, 2018. "Firm Size and the Business Model for Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-27, December.
    12. Thilini Cooray & Samanthi Senaratne & A. D. Nuwan Gunarathne & Roshan Herath & Dileepa Samudrage, 2020. "Does Integrated Reporting Enhance the Value Relevance of Information? Evidence from Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Ringsberg, Henrik, 2023. "Sustainable FLM transport based on IPF transport by ferry in coastal rural areas: A case from Sweden," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Waris Ali & Zeeshan Mahmood & Jeffrey Wilson & Hina Ismail, 2024. "The impact of sustainability governance attributes on comprehensive CSR reporting: A developing country setting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1802-1817, May.
    15. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.
    16. Eleonora Annunziata & Francesco Rizzi & Tiberio Daddi & Marco Frey, 2019. "Business models for interfirm energy cooperation in industrial parks: A possible taxonomy," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 133-148.
    17. Guosong Wang & Huizhen Zhang, 2025. "FinTech-Driven Corporate Sustainability: A Technology–Organization–Environment Framework Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Finja Lena Kind & Jennifer Zeppenfeld & Rainer Lueg, 2023. "The impact of chief executive officer narcissism on environmental, social, and governance reporting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4448-4466, November.
    19. José Augusto Lacerda Fernandes & José Milton de Sousa-Filho & Fernando Luiz Emerenciano Viana, 2021. "Sustainable Business Models in a Challenging Context: The Amana Katu Case," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(3), pages 200205-2002.
    20. Anna M. Hansson & Eja Pedersen & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2023. "Barriers and drivers for sustainable business model innovation based on a radical farmland change scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8083-8106, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:116-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.