IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v52y2014i4p682-704.html

Building Power Together: Union Support for Central Labour Bodies

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Bielski Boris
  • Jeff Grabelsky

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Bielski Boris & Jeff Grabelsky, 2014. "Building Power Together: Union Support for Central Labour Bodies," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 682-704, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:52:y:2014:i:4:p:682-704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/bjir.12008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Hickey & Sarosh Kuruvilla & Tashlin Lakhani, 2010. "No Panacea for Success: Member Activism, Organizing and Union Renewal," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 53-83, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nana Wesley Hansen & Nick Krachler, 2024. "Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building: When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits!," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(2), pages 530-555, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melanie Simms, 2015. "Accounting for Greenfield Union Organizing Outcomes," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 397-422, September.
    2. Catharine Ross, 2013. "New unions in the UK : the vanguard or the rearguard of the union movement?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 78-94, January.
    3. Jack Fiorito & Irene Padavic & Philip S. DeOrtentiis, 2015. "Reconsidering Union Activism and Its Meaning," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 556-579, September.
    4. Ann Cecilie Bergene & Cathrine Egeland, 2016. "Interventionism as a union strategy? The strategies of the Norwegian Nurses Organisation in relation to temporary agency work," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(4), pages 521-534, November.
    5. John Kallas, 2025. "What If You Mobilize Effectively and Still Do Not Win? Reclaiming a Relational Understanding of Strike Outcomes and Employer Power Resources," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(2), pages 233-246, June.
    6. Linda Briskin, 2011. "The militancy of nurses and union renewal," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(4), pages 485-499, November.
    7. John Kallas, 2023. "Retooling militancy: Labour revitalization and fixed‐duration strikes," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(1), pages 68-88, March.
    8. Peter Fairbrother, 2015. "Rethinking trade unionism: Union renewal as transition," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(4), pages 561-576, December.
    9. Bradon Ellem, 2014. "A battle between titans? Rio Tinto and union recognition in Australia’s iron ore industry," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 35(1), pages 185-200, February.
    10. Jack Fiorito & Gregor Gall & Arthur Martinez, 2010. "Activism and Willingness to Help in Union Organizing: Who Are the Activists?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 263-284, September.
    11. Cathy Brigden & Sarah Kaine, 2015. "Rethinking factional alliances and union renewal: Inter-union collaboration in the 21st century," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 36(2), pages 239-257, May.
    12. Michele Ford & Michael Gillan, 2026. "The Global Union Federations and their affiliates: Constrained agency in action," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 47(1), pages 173-195, February.
    13. Gregor Gall, 2018. "The uses, abuses and non-uses of Rethinking Industrial Relations in understanding industrial relations and organised labour," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(4), pages 681-700, November.
    14. Edmund Heery, 2015. "Unions and the organising turn: Reflections after 20 years of Organising Works," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(4), pages 545-560, December.
    15. Simon Pek, 2019. "Rekindling Union Democracy Through the Use of Sortition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 1033-1051, April.
    16. Rothstein, Sidney A., 2019. "Innovation and precarity: Workplace discourse in twenty-first century capitalism," MPIfG Discussion Paper 19/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. Gregor Gall & Jack Fiorito, 2016. "Union effectiveness: In search of the Holy Grail," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(1), pages 189-211, February.
    18. Suzanne Muna, 2017. "Partners in protest: parents, unions and anti-academy campaigns," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 326-344, July.
    19. Gregor Gall & Jack Fiorito, 2012. "Union Commitment and Activism in Britain and the United States: Searching for Synthesis and Synergy for Renewal," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 189-213, June.
    20. Maite Tapia, 2013. "Marching to Different Tunes: Commitment and Culture as Mobilizing Mechanisms of Trade Unions and Community Organizations," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 666-688, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:52:y:2014:i:4:p:682-704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.