IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v85y2014i2p165-191.html

Nouvel Essor Des Fondations Au Québec Et Au Canada: Pour Une Analyse Sociopolitique Fondée Sur Le Concept D'Économie Plurielle

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia GAZZOLI
  • Christian JETTÉ
  • Valérie CHAMBERLAND
  • Lucie DUMAIS
  • Yves VAILLANCOURT

Abstract

type="main" xml:lang="es"> Las fundaciones han sido escasamente estudiadas en Canadá y en Quebec. Nuestro artículo reconoce el papel desempeñado por estas organizaciones, así como la aparición de nuevas fundaciones, cuya fortaleza se pone de manifiesto tanto en el número de ellas como en las donaciones que perciben. La primera parte recoge una recensión de artículos procedentes de USA desde los años 2000. La segunda examina los datos relativos a las fundaciones canadienses y quebequenses que están disponibles en las principales fuentes utilizadas en Canadá y en Quebec, es decir, fuentes que tienen tendencia a delimitar y clasificar las fundaciones a partir de categorías principalmente fiscales y legales, lo que conduce a afirmar, con toda simplicidad, que las mismas son privadas o públicas. A la conclusión de estas dos primeras partes del artículo, estamos en disposición de plantear algunas cuestiones sobre los límites de los enfoques basados principalmente en categorías fiscales y legales. Así, se propone abiertamente en la tercera parte del artículo un avance de una visión teórica alternativa de perfil más sociopolítico. Este enfoque hace referencia a los conceptos de economía social y solidaria y de economía plural, con la finalidad de conocer mejor las fundaciones y los nuevos compromisos institucionales en los que están inmersas en Canadá. A partir de estas herramientas conceptuales, afirmamos que las fundaciones pueden ser analizadas como parte integrante de la economía social y solidaria, lo que no quiere decir que reproduzcan automáticamente en sus prácticas y valores los principios de la Economía Social y Solidaria (ESS). Por contra, en sus prácticas, para favorecer la claridad de la economía plural, es posible desplegar un análisis sociopolítico enfocado a las diferentes configuraciones o formas de hibridación específicas derivadas de las transacciones entre los principios de la ESS (reciprocidad), de la economía privada (competencia) y de la economía pública (redistribución).

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia GAZZOLI & Christian JETTÉ & Valérie CHAMBERLAND & Lucie DUMAIS & Yves VAILLANCOURT, 2014. "Nouvel Essor Des Fondations Au Québec Et Au Canada: Pour Une Analyse Sociopolitique Fondée Sur Le Concept D'Économie Plurielle," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(2), pages 165-191, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:85:y:2014:i:2:p:165-191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/apce.12034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lester M. Salamon, 2010. "Putting The Civil Society Sector On The Economic Map Of The World," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(2), pages 167-210, June.
    2. Anheier, Helmut K., 2001. "Foundations in Europe: a comparative perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 8498, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fowler, A.F. & Biekart, K., 2011. "Civic driven change: a narrative to bring politics back into civil society discourse," ISS Working Papers - General Series 529, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    2. Jorge Coque & Pilar L. González-Torre, 2017. "Adapting Nonprofit Resources to New Social Demands: The Food Banks in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Gani Aldashev & François Libois & Joaquín Morales Belpaire & Astrid Similon, 2014. "Encouraging Private Ownership of Public Goods: Theory and Evidence from Belgium," Working Papers 1408, University of Namur, Department of Economics.
    4. Andreea-Angela ?EULEAN (VON?EA), 2019. "The State As Interacting With The Market €“ A Suitable Context For The Nonprofit Sector," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 5-16, March.
    5. Aldashev, Gani & Marini, Marco & Verdier, Thierry, 2014. "Brothers in alms? Coordination between nonprofits on markets for donations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 182-200.
    6. Alan Fowler & Kees Biekart, 2013. "Relocating Civil Society in a Politics of Civic-Driven Change," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31(4), pages 463-483, July.
    7. Theresa Gehringer, 2020. "Corporate Foundations as Partnership Brokers in Supporting the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Emiliana Mangone & ErikaMarie Pace, 2014. "(English) Civil Society in the Italian Reformed Healthcare System: A Role or Responsibility? (Italiano) La società civile nel sistema sanitaria italiano riformato: ruolo o responsabilità?," IRPPS Working Papers 63:2014, National Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies.
    9. Jelena Stankevičienė & Marek Szarucki, 2015. "Editorial: Dilemmas of Modern Economy and Business," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 3(4), pages 7-9.
    10. Strzałkowski, Andrzej, 2024. "Adaptation and operationalisation of sustainable degrowth for policy: Why we need to translate research papers into legislative drafts?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Andrea SALUSTRI & Federica VIGANÒ, 2018. "The contribution of the non-profit sector in narrowing spatial inequalities: Four cases of inter-institutional cooperation in Italy," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & CIRIEC (ed.), Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 21-36, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    12. Sylvie Paré & Ralph Christian Maloumby-Baka, 2015. "The Role of Public-Third Sector Relationships in Solving Social Issues: the Case of One-Stop-Shop Service for the Promotion of Female Immigrant Entrepreneurship in Montreal," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 3(3), pages 123-141.
    13. Stefania Veltri & Giovanni Bronzetti, 2015. "A Critical Analysis of the Intellectual Capital Measuring, Managing, and Reporting Practices in the Non-profit Sector: Lessons Learnt from a Case Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 305-318, October.
    14. Gani Aldashev & Esteban Jaimovich & Thierry Verdier, 2018. "Small is Beautiful: Motivational Allocation in the Nonprofit Sector," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 730-780.
    15. Primož Pevcin, 2012. "Analysis of Cross-Country Differences in the Non-Profit Sector Size," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(2), pages 186-204.
    16. Hazem S Kassem & Salim Bagadeem & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi & Mohammed Aljuaid, 2021. "Are partnerships in nonprofit organizations being governed for sustainability? A partnering life cycle assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Makýšová Lucia & Vaceková Gabriela, 2017. "Profitable Nonprofits? Reward-Based Crowdfunding in the Czech Republic," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 203-227, December.
    18. Marco Minciullo & Matteo Pedrini, 2020. "Antecedents of board involvement and its consequences on organisational effectiveness in non-profit organisations: a study on European corporate foundations," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 531-555, June.
    19. Thomas Krikser & Bettina Matzdorf, 2015. "Environmental Foundations in Germany," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, May.
    20. Lutz Preuss & Isabel Fischer & Bimal Arora, 2024. "How do stakeholder groups make sense of sustainability: Analysing differences in the complexity of their cognitive frames," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2367-2383, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:85:y:2014:i:2:p:165-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.