IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v61y2025i1p239-271.html

Digital Accountability in Collaborative Public Governance in Times of Crisis: Analysing the Debate in a Polarized Social Forum

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Polzer
  • Selin Öner

Abstract

Accountability in collaborative public governance initiatives and in digital era governance is under‐researched, especially in the context of crisis and where issues are debated in a social forum. Accountability considerations are considered particularly important in collaborative governance arrangements, which are of growing relevance for delivering public services. This study, anchored in notions of digital accountability, analyzes debate in a social media forum about a collaborative governance initiative implemented during a crisis. The empirical case is the Austrian contact tracing app, a digital innovation considered key in managing the COVID‐19 pandemic. The study makes several contributions. First, it is one of the first to focus on the crucial role of debate in digital accountability in collaborative governance. Second, the study shows that the debate extends beyond the mere content of the innovation, highlighting the need to consider the ‘ecology’ of other (digital) tools, measures, and policies for crisis mitigation in parallel. Third, the study sheds light on the temporal dynamics of accountability in crisis response. The study contributes conceptually to an enhanced understanding of the expertise of actors in delivering and receiving digital public services. It also contributes to a management perspective of digital accountability, which is important given the potential implications for (non)acceptance of public sector innovations in crises and beyond. An enhanced understanding is possibly even more crucial for innovations requiring citizen co‐production in sensitive areas such as health.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Polzer & Selin Öner, 2025. "Digital Accountability in Collaborative Public Governance in Times of Crisis: Analysing the Debate in a Polarized Social Forum," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 61(1), pages 239-271, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:61:y:2025:i:1:p:239-271
    DOI: 10.1111/abac.12351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12351
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/abac.12351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-06-2014-1735 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Marco Bellucci & Lorenzo Simoni & Diletta Acuti & Giacomo Manetti, 2019. "Stakeholder engagement and dialogic accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(5), pages 1467-1499, August.
    3. Ingrid Jeacle & Chris Carter, 2014. "Creative spaces in interdisciplinary accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1233-1240, October.
    4. Nerantzidis, Michail & Tampakoudis, Ioannis & She, Chaoyuan, 2024. "Social media in accounting research: A review and future research agenda," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-09-2017-3158 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Hyndman, Noel & McConville, Danielle, 2018. "Trust and accountability in UK charities: Exploring the virtuous circle," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 227-237.
    7. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2022. "Scientization Under Pressure—The Problematic Role of Expert Bodies During the Handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 291-307, June.
    8. Ingrid Jeacle & Chris Carter, 2014. "Creative spaces in interdisciplinary accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1233-1240, October.
    9. Erik Hans Klijn & Jose Nederhand & Vidar Stevens, 2022. "The necessity of collaboration in branding: analysing the conditions for output legitimacy through qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 664-682, May.
    10. Peter Triantafillou & Magnus Paulsen Hansen, 2022. "Introduction to the PMR special issue on accountability and legitimacy under collaborative governance," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 655-663, May.
    11. Martin Kornberger & Stephan Leixnering & Renate E. Meyer, 2019. "The logic of tact : How decisions happen in situations of crisis," Post-Print hal-02312257, HAL.
    12. Daniela Cristofoli & Scott Douglas & Jacob Torfing & Benedetta Trivellato, 2022. "Having it all: can collaborative governance be both legitimate and accountable?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 704-728, May.
    13. Iris Vanhommerig & Philip Marcel Karré, 2014. "Public accountability in the Internet age: changing roles for governments and citizens," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 206-217, April.
    14. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2021. "Accountable Government through Collaborative Governance?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Reinhard Millner & Michael Meyer, 2022. "Collaborative governance in Social Impact Bonds: aligning interests within divergent accountabilities?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 729-751, May.
    16. Neu, Dean & Saxton, Greg & Rahaman, Abu & Everett, Jeffery, 2019. "Twitter and social accountability: Reactions to the Panama Papers," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 38-53.
    17. Kelum Jayasinghe & Christine M. Kenney & Raj Prasanna & Jerry Velasquez, 2020. "Enacting “accountability in collaborative governance”: lessons in emergency management and earthquake recovery from the 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquakes," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 439-459, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goncharenko, Galina, 2023. "In the spotlight: Rethinking NGO accountability in the #MeToo era," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Maran, Laura & Bigoni, Michele & Morrison, Leanne, 2023. "Shedding light on alternative interdisciplinary accounting research through journal editors’ perspectives and an analysis of recent publications," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Pimentel, Erica & Cho, Charles & Bothello, Joel, 2022. "The blind spots of interdisciplinarity in addressing grand challenges," MPRA Paper 114562, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Mehdi Khodakarami & Zabihollah Rezaee & Reza Hesarzadeh, 2021. "Islamic Religious Atmosphere and Audit Pricing: Evidence from Iran," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 716-737, October.
    5. Reilley, Jacob & Löhlein, Lukas, 2023. "Theorizing (and) the future of interdisciplinary accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Nerantzidis, Michail & Tampakoudis, Ioannis & She, Chaoyuan, 2024. "Social media in accounting research: A review and future research agenda," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    7. Pimentel, Erica & Cho, Charles H. & Bothello, Joel, 2023. "The blind spots of interdisciplinarity in addressing grand challenges," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Chahed, Yasmine & Charnock, Robert & Du Rietz, Sabina & Joseph Lennon, Niels & Palermo, Tommaso & Parisi, Cristiana & Pflueger, Dane & Sundström, Andreas & Toh, Dorothy & Yu, Lichen, 2025. "The value of research activities “other than” publishing articles: reflections on an experimental workshop series," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121656, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. ‘Alim J. Beveridge & Markus A. Höllerer, 2023. "Theorizing Organizational Benevolence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 1864-1886, September.
    10. repec:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:1:p:1388-1409 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Tom Christensen & Mads Dagnis Jensen & Michael Kluth & Gunnar Helgi Kristinsson & Kennet Lynggaard & Per Lægreid & Risto Niemikari & Jon Pierre & Tapio Raunio & Gústaf Adolf Skúlason, 2023. "The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid‐19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 658-676, July.
    12. Giuseppe Nicolo & Lukasz Bryl & Diana Ferullo, 2025. "The Impact of National Cultural Dimensions on Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure: Evidence From Social Media Practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 6345-6362, July.
    13. Samuel Stephan Rorimpandey & Aurik Gustomo, 2025. "Transparency and Accountability of NGOs in Managing Corporate Social Funds," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 10(3), pages 20-28, May.
    14. Tassiani Aparecida Dos Santos & Iago França Lopes, 2025. "Is Social Media a Democratic Forum for Public Accountability in Times of Crisis? The Brazilian Government's Response to the COVID‐19 Pandemic," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 61(1), pages 194-217, March.
    15. Di Cimbrini, Tiziana & Paolone, Francesco, 2025. "Accountability-based accounting in the blame game for post-disaster aid," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    16. Tregidga, Helen & Milne, Markus J., 2022. "Not at our table: Stakeholder exclusion and ant/agonistic engagements," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    17. Jan Boon & Eva Wolf, 2025. "How exclusion structures policy conflict in collaborative governance," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(3), pages 507-529, September.
    18. Hege Hofstad & Christel Dahl & Kjersti Følling & Kostas Mouratidis & Bent Olav Olsen & Stine Busborg Sagen & Hilde Hatleskog Zeiner, 2025. "Community Social Sustainability: Unpacking the Concept for Urban Governance and Planning," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 3970-3984, June.
    19. Dellaportas, Steven & Xu, Lina & Yang, Zhiqiang, 2022. "The level of cross-disciplinarity in cross-disciplinary accounting research: analysis and suggestions for improvement," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Dorine Maurice Mattar, 2021. "An Organizational Change With Quarantined Members," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    21. Dameri, Renata Paola & Benevolo, Clara & Demartini, Paola, 2024. "Accounting and reporting for facing multiple values in meso-level hybrid organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:61:y:2025:i:1:p:239-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.