IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oejbsm/v10y2025i4p15-39id3338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Resource Distribution on Service Delivery of Public Water Service Providers in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Richard Wamalwa
  • Dr. Fred Gichana Atandi
  • Dr. Moses Owino

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of strategic partnership on service delivery among the public water service providers in Kenya. Methodology: The study employed a mixed-methods research design, specifically an explanatory sequential approach, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. This involved collecting and analyzing quantitative data first using a cross-sectional survey with structured questionnaires administered to a sample of personnel within public water service providers in Kenya. This quantitative phase aimed to test hypotheses and establish relationships between variables. Following this, a qualitative phase was conducted using semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, such as managers and staff, to provide in-depth insights and contextual explanations for the quantitative findings. This integrated approach allowed for both the testing of relationships and a deeper exploration of the underlying factors influencing service delivery. The target population for the study comprised all 88 public water service providers in Kenya, focusing on key management and staff members involved in service delivery, totaling 352 potential respondents. To ensure a manageable yet representative sample, the study utilized the Krejcie and Morgan formula, which yielded a sample size of 184 respondents selected from 46 randomly chosen water service providers, stratified by size. The data collected through both quantitative and qualitative instruments were analyzed using descriptive statistics to summarize the data and inferential statistics, specifically regression analysis, to examine the relationships between strategic partnership, resource distribution, diversification, innovativeness, and service delivery, as guided by the study's hypotheses. Findings: The study achieved a high response rate of 76.63% from the distributed 184 questionnaires. Descriptive statistics for resource distribution showed generally high levels of agreement among respondents, with average mean scores around 3.96 on a 5-point scale (ranging from 3.87 to 4.06) and average standard deviations around 0.92 (ranging from 0.82 to 0.99), indicating a shared positive view on the importance of various resource distribution aspects for service delivery. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between human resource placement and service delivery (r = 0.832, p < 0.001), and between investment portfolios and service delivery (r = 0.812, p < 0.001), while the correlation between physical infrastructure and service delivery was not statistically significant (r = 0.040, p = 0.664). The multiple regression model demonstrated a strong overall relationship between resource distribution and service delivery, with an R-squared value of 0.860 (adjusted R-squared = 0.856), and the ANOVA indicated the model was statistically significant (F(3,116) = 237.006, p < 0.001). The regression coefficients showed that human resource placement (β = 0.576, p < 0.001) and investment portfolios (β = 0.512, p < 0.001) had a significant positive effect on service delivery, while physical infrastructure did not (β = -0.037, p = 0.273). Unique Contributions to Theory, Practice and Policy: Based on the findings, this study uniquely contributes to theory, policy, and practice by demonstrating the critical role of strategic resource distribution, particularly in human resources and technology investments, in enhancing service delivery within the public water sector in Kenya. The findings support the Stakeholder Theory by highlighting how engagement informs resource allocation strategies. For policy, the study underscores the need for an enabling regulatory framework that facilitates digital transformation and ensures financial sustainability to support these crucial investments. In practice, the study recommends that public water service providers prioritize strategic human resource placement and development, along with investments in business technology portfolios, and strengthen partnerships to optimize resource utilization and improve service delivery outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Richard Wamalwa & Dr. Fred Gichana Atandi & Dr. Moses Owino, 2025. "Effect of Resource Distribution on Service Delivery of Public Water Service Providers in Kenya," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 10(4), pages 15-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:10:y:2025:i:4:p:15-39:id:3338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/EJBSM/article/view/3338
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    2. Andrew L. Friedman & Samantha Miles, 2002. "Developing Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan Ding & Thomas Jeanjean & Hervé Stolowy, 2013. "Accounting for Stakeholders or Shareholders? The Case of R&D Reporting," Post-Print hal-01002936, HAL.
    2. Jose Luis Retolaza & Maite Ruiz & Leire San‐Jose, 2009. "CSR in business start‐ups: an application method for stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(6), pages 324-336, November.
    3. ATM Adnan & Nisar Ahmed, 2019. "The Transformation Of The Corporate Governance Model: A Literature Review," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 8(3), pages 7-47.
    4. Chernyi, Alex & Uotila, Juha, 2024. "Prioritization of organizational stakeholders: A managerial decision-making perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom, 2011. "Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 77-87, March.
    6. Zana Prutina & Dzevad Sehic, 2016. "Employees’ Perceptions Of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study Of Award Recipient," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 25(1), pages 239-260, june.
    7. Tanja Schwarzmüller & Prisca Brosi & Vera Stelkens & Matthias Spörrle & Isabell M. Welpe, 2017. "Investors’ reactions to companies’ stakeholder management: the crucial role of assumed costs and perceived sustainability," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 10(1), pages 79-96, June.
    8. Korneta Piotr, 2020. "Stakeholders and Performance Management Systems of Small and Medium-Sized Outpatient Clinics," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 211-222, January.
    9. Mahoney, Joseph & Asher, Cheryl Carleton & Mahoney, James, 2004. "Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm," Working Papers 04-0116, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    10. Garrod, Brian & Fyall, Alan & Leask, Anna & Reid, Elaine, 2012. "Engaging residents as stakeholders of the visitor attraction," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1159-1173.
    11. Samantha Miles, 2012. "Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 285-298, July.
    12. Sergiy D. Dmytriyev & R. Edward Freeman & Jacob Hörisch, 2021. "The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1441-1470, September.
    13. Prno, Jason & Scott Slocombe, D., 2012. "Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 346-357.
    14. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1059 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Scholtens, Bert, 2008. "A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 46-55, December.
    18. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti & Carlo Vermiglio, 2021. "Sustainable development and financial institutions: Do banks' environmental policies influence customer deposits?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 643-656, January.
    19. Thomas Maak & Nicola M. Pless & Christian Voegtlin, 2016. "Business Statesman or Shareholder Advocate? CEO Responsible Leadership Styles and the Micro-Foundations of Political CSR," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 463-493, May.
    20. Marc Bollecker & Pierre Mathieu & Claude Clementz, 2006. "Le Comportement Socialement Responsable Des Entreprises : Une Lecture Des Travaux En Comptabilite Et Contrôle De Gestion Dans Une Perspective Neo-Institutionnaliste," Post-Print halshs-00769052, HAL.
    21. Päivi Myllykangas & Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki, 2010. "Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 65-72, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:10:y:2025:i:4:p:15-39:id:3338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/EJBSM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.