IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p9739-9745.html

Prenatal Genetic Test: Legal and Technical Implications for Genetic Selective Abortion in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Nuraisyah Chua Abdullah

    (Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Director, Zakesy Biotech Sdn. Bhd.)

  • Teh Lay Kek

    (Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Director, Zakesy Biotech Sdn. Bhd.)

  • Mohd Zaki Salleh

    (Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Director, Zakesy Biotech Sdn. Bhd.)

  • Ramzyzan Ramly

    (Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Director, Zakesy Biotech Sdn. Bhd.)

Abstract

The purpose of prenatal chromosomal abnormality testing is to accurately determine a patient's risk of carrying a foetus that has a chromosomal abnormality. There are many different prenatal screening and diagnostic test options available; each has its own relative benefits and drawbacks, different specification of test and performance levels. There is no one test that is better than another when it comes to screening test characteristics, so patients must make complex decisions and receive thoughtful, patient-cantered counselling from obstetric care professionals. This article discusses the general legal provisions governing abortion in Malaysia and its exceptions to address the possibility of genetic selective abortion in Malaysia. The discussion focused on the statute of general application i.e., the Penal Code and the Guidelines on Termination of Pregnancy for Hospitals (hereinafter referred to as the Guidelines), 2012 established by the Ministry of Health Malaysia. The guidelines emphasizes the importance of collaboration among healthcare professionals, policymakers, and support groups to ensure safe abortions. It outlines legal aspects, standard operating procedures, and organizational strategies for providing comprehensive and supportive care throughout the termination of pregnancy process. The focus is on protecting women's health and well-being while adhering to legal and ethical considerations. This is, in line with the more flexible approach towards abortion as per the Abortion Care Guideline issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 8 March 2022.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuraisyah Chua Abdullah & Teh Lay Kek & Mohd Zaki Salleh & Ramzyzan Ramly, 2025. "Prenatal Genetic Test: Legal and Technical Implications for Genetic Selective Abortion in Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 9739-9745, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:9739-9745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/9739-9745.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/prenatal-genetic-test-legal-and-technical-implications-for-genetic-selective-abortion-in-malaysia/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianne Bitler & Madeline Zavodny, 2002. "Child Abuse and Abortion Availability," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 363-367, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mitrut, Andreea & Wolff, François-Charles, 2011. "The impact of legalized abortion on child health outcomes and abandonment. Evidence from Romania," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 1219-1231.
    2. Lindo, Jason M. & Schaller, Jessamyn & Hansen, Benjamin, 2013. "Economic Conditions and Child Abuse," IZA Discussion Papers 7355, IZA Network @ LISER.
    3. S Anukriti & Sonia Bhalotra & Eddy H F Tam, 2022. "On the Quantity and Quality of Girls: Fertility, Parental Investments and Mortality," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(641), pages 1-36.
    4. Sen, Bisakha & Wingate, Martha Slay & Kirby, Russell, 2012. "The relationship between state abortion-restrictions and homicide deaths among children under 5 years of age: A longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 156-164.
    5. Gorkem Turgut Ozer & Brad N. Greenwood & Anandasivam Gopal, 2023. "Digital Multisided Platforms and Women’s Health: An Empirical Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Lending and Abortion Rates," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 223-252, March.
    6. Lee, Cheuk Ling & Chong, Terence Tai Leung, 2024. "Distance to Abortion Facilities and Child Living Conditions-Implication of the Abortion Law Change in the United States," MPRA Paper 120640, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Clarke, Damian, 2023. "The Economics of Abortion Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 16395, IZA Network @ LISER.
    8. Joseph J. Sabia & Daniel I. Rees, 2013. "The Effect Of Parental Involvement Laws On Youth Suicide," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 620-636, January.
    9. Lindo, Jason M. & Pineda-Torres, Mayra, 2021. "New Evidence on the Effects of Mandatory Waiting Periods for Abortion," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Lindo, Jason M. & Schaller, Jessamyn & Hansen, Benjamin, 2018. "Caution! Men not at work: Gender-specific labor market conditions and child maltreatment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 77-98.
    11. Kelly, Kimberly, 2014. "The spread of ‘Post Abortion Syndrome’ as social diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 18-25.
    12. Priti Kalsi, 2026. "Measures of son preference and the treatment of girls in India," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 39(1), pages 1-28, March.
    13. Andrew Hussey & Alex Nikolsko-Rzhevskyy & Jay Walker, 2014. "AIDing contraception: HIV and recent trends in abortion," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(15), pages 1788-1803, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:9739-9745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.