IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p3177-3190.html

A Systematic Analysis of Ethical and Governance Concerns Relating to Artificial Intelligence Adoption in the South African Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Wiston Mbhazima Baloyi

    (Department of CoGHSTA, Limpopo Province, South Africa)

Abstract

Globally, artificial intelligence (AI)-related technologies are rapidly reforming public services in a modern way. Contemporary public administrations are experiencing increased operational efficiency, streamlined work processes and greater productivity through AI-driven technologies. However, emerging economies such as South Africa still face AI ethical and governance concerns that hamper their full potential. Therefore, this study proposes an integrated conceptual framework for ethical and governance concerns of AI in the South African public sector, which was developed based on the findings. Underpinned by the constructivist worldview, this study employs a qualitative approach using the rapid systematic analysis of literature to investigate ethical and governance concerns of AI in the South African public sector. The rapid systematic literature analysis focused on a comprehensive search of sources from the Web of Science, Science Direct and ProQuest databases for the period ranging from 2023 to 2025. A total number of 34 peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers and academic book chapters were included in the systematic literature analysis. The key findings reveal that ethical and governance concerns, such as data privacy, security, bias, public trust, fairness, equity, accountability, transparency and regulatory framework, are fundamental in designing and implementing AI-enabled technologies in the public sector. Further, the study’s findings suggest an integrated conceptual model that can be considered a valuable technique in adopting AI in the public sector. The model intends to provide a structural approach to improve AI adoption not only in the South African public sector. Decision-makers, policymakers, practitioners, and strategists of the public sector can find the implications of this study significant in AI adoption while taking into cognizance ethical and governance concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Wiston Mbhazima Baloyi, 2025. "A Systematic Analysis of Ethical and Governance Concerns Relating to Artificial Intelligence Adoption in the South African Public Sector," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 3177-3190, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:3177-3190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/3177-3190.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/a-systematic-analysis-of-ethical-and-governance-concerns-relating-to-artificial-intelligence-adoption-in-the-south-african-public-sector/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lehlohonolo Josiaya Malope, 2025. "Unlocking The Potential: Exploring The Influence Of Artificial Intelligence On E-Health Enhancement In South Africa," Journal of Economic and Social Development, Clinical Journals Press, vol. 12(1), pages 146-156, March.
    2. Anca Florentina Vatamanu & Mihaela Tofan, 2025. "Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Public Administration: Challenges and Vulnerabilities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Pedro Robles & Daniel J. Mallinson, 2025. "Artificial intelligence technology, public trust, and effective governance," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 42(1), pages 11-28, January.
    4. Agbarakwe, Harriet Akudo. & Chibueze, Ozioma Ogbonna, 2024. "Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Assessment and Feedback Mechanisms in Nigeria Higher Education System," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 142-151, September.
    5. Howard Chitimira & Sharon Munedzi, 2024. "Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Eradicating Poverty and Enhancing Global Security in South Africa: A Regulatory Perspective," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 1(43), pages 84-96, May.
    6. Inga Ulnicane & Aini Aden, 2023. "Power and politics in framing bias in Artificial Intelligence policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(5), pages 665-687, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wiston Mbhazima Baloyi, 2026. "A Critical Review of the Effect of Irregular Expenditure on Service Delivery in South Africa," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(2), pages 244-255, February.
    2. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:1369-1377 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borba, Rafael Lucas & de Paula Ferreira, Iuri Emmanuel & Bertucci Ramos, Paulo Henrique, 2024. "Addressing discriminatory bias in artificial intelligence systems operated by companies: An analysis of end-user perspectives," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:1369-1377 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Saša Zdravković & Filip Dobrić & Zoran Injac & Violeta Lukić-Vujadinović & Milinko Veličković & Branka Bursać Vranješ & Srđan Marinković, 2025. "AI-Driven Safety Evaluation in Public Transport: A Case Study from Belgrade’s Closed Transit Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-36, September.
    4. Andreas Öjehag‐Pettersson & Vanja Carlsson & Malin Rönnblom, 2024. "Political studies of automated governing: A bird's eye (re)view," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 1049-1064, October.
    5. Anna Björk & Atte Ojanen & Johannes Anttila & Johannes Mikkonen, 2025. "At the Conceptual Crossroads of Politics and Technology: An Exploration Into EU Digital Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    6. Issara Sereewatthanawut & Patipan Sriphon & Pattrawut Khunwipusit & Babatunde Oluwaseun Ajayi & Ademola Enitan Ilesanmi & Jutarat Suwaree & Wonlop Writthym Buachoom, 2026. "Efficient AI-driven allegation screening: A case study of Thailand’s National Anti-Corruption Commission," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Park, Jeong-Ah & Kim, Chang Hyun & Kim, Hye-Jin, 2026. "AI literacy for safe deployment: Cross-national evidence on the interaction between talent and governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    8. Inga Ulnicane & Tero Erkkilä, 2023. "Politics and policy of Artificial Intelligence," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(5), pages 612-625, September.
    9. Ð . Ð . Nosikov, 2025. "AI-Driven Public Services: A Taxonomy of Accountability and Sovereign Artificial Intelligence (AI)," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 5.
    10. Domenico Trezza & Giuseppe Luca De Luca Picione & Carmine Sergianni, 2025. "AI Response Quality in Public Services: Temperature Settings and Contextual Factors," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Loredana Maria Clim (Moga) & Mariana Man & Ionica Oncioiu, 2025. "Mapping Territorial Disparities in Artificial Intelligence Adoption Across Local Public Administrations: Multilevel Evidence from Germany," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:3177-3190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.