IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338633.html

Efficient AI-driven allegation screening: A case study of Thailand’s National Anti-Corruption Commission

Author

Listed:
  • Issara Sereewatthanawut
  • Patipan Sriphon
  • Pattrawut Khunwipusit
  • Babatunde Oluwaseun Ajayi
  • Ademola Enitan Ilesanmi
  • Jutarat Suwaree
  • Wonlop Writthym Buachoom

Abstract

Efficient screening of corruption allegations is crucial for promoting accountability and transparency in public administration. However, many institutions still rely on manual processes that are prone to inefficiency and inconsistency. As AI gains traction across sectors, this study develops and evaluates an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered prototype designed to support the preliminary screening of corruption complaints at Thailand’s National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC). The proposed system integrates Optical Character Recognition (OCR), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and machine learning techniques to automate document handling and improve workflows. A mixed-methods research approach was adopted, combining institutional process analysis with a comprehensive technical performance assessment. The OCR module achieved an F1-score of 81.8%, with precision and recall of 84.2% and 79.6%, respectively. For printed text, the system attained 72% word-level accuracy and 78% at the character level. Additionally, the integrated framework demonstrated a classification accuracy of 57.5% and significantly improved operational efficiency, reducing average complaint processing time by 78.6% compared to traditional manual methods. The findings highlight AI’s transformative potential in enhancing anti-corruption efforts through increased speed, accuracy, and consistency. They underscore the importance of responsible and context-sensitive AI adoption in public sector governance. This study contributes to the growing discourse on digital governance by providing empirical evidence and practical insights for policymakers and practitioners aiming to implement scalable, transparent, and ethically grounded AI solutions within institutional accountability frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Issara Sereewatthanawut & Patipan Sriphon & Pattrawut Khunwipusit & Babatunde Oluwaseun Ajayi & Ademola Enitan Ilesanmi & Jutarat Suwaree & Wonlop Writthym Buachoom, 2026. "Efficient AI-driven allegation screening: A case study of Thailand’s National Anti-Corruption Commission," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338633
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338633
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338633&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.