IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i7p283-d1705129.html

Mapping Territorial Disparities in Artificial Intelligence Adoption Across Local Public Administrations: Multilevel Evidence from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Loredana Maria Clim (Moga)

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, “Eugeniu Carada” Doctoral School of Economic Sciences, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Mariana Man

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, “Eugeniu Carada” Doctoral School of Economic Sciences, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania
    Faculty of Sciences, University of Petroșani, 332006 Petroșani, Romania)

  • Ionica Oncioiu

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, “Eugeniu Carada” Doctoral School of Economic Sciences, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania
    Academy of Romanian Scientists, 3 Ilfov, 050044 Bucharest, Romania
    Department of Informatics, Faculty of Informatics, Titu Maiorescu University, 189 Calea Vacaresti St., 040051 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In a European context, facing pressure to digitalize public administration, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) at the local level remains a deeply uneven and empirically poorly understood process. This study investigates the degree of adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in local public administrations in Germany, exploring territorial disparities and institutional factors influencing this transition. Based on a national sample of 347 municipalities, this research proposes a composite AI adoption index, built by integrating six relevant indicators (including the use of conversational bots and the automation of internal and decision-making processes). In the simulations, local administration profiles were differentiated according to factors such as IT staff (with a weight of 30%), the degree of urbanization (25%), and participation in digital networks (20%), reflecting significant structural variations between regions. The analysis model used is a multilevel one, which highlights the combined influences of local and regional factors. The results indicate a clear stratification of digital innovation capacity, with significant differences between eastern and western Germany, as well as between urban and rural environments. The study contributes to the specialized literature by developing a replicable analytical tool and provides public policy recommendations for reducing interregional digital divides.

Suggested Citation

  • Loredana Maria Clim (Moga) & Mariana Man & Ionica Oncioiu, 2025. "Mapping Territorial Disparities in Artificial Intelligence Adoption Across Local Public Administrations: Multilevel Evidence from Germany," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:283-:d:1705129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/7/283/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/7/283/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anca Florentina Vatamanu & Mihaela Tofan, 2025. "Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Public Administration: Challenges and Vulnerabilities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Yu-Che Chen & Michael J. Ahn & Yi-Fan Wang, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Public Values: Value Impacts and Governance in the Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Ionut Ghibanu, 2019. "Strategies and Techniques of Organizational Image Building," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 193-199, March.
    4. Bernd W. Wirtz & Jan C. Weyerer & Carolin Geyer, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 596-615, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matej Babšek & Dejan Ravšelj & Lan Umek & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2025. "Mapping the Adoption of Disruptive Technologies in Public Administration: A Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Practical Applications," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, May.
    2. Agbabiaka, Olusegun & Ojo, Adegboyega & Connolly, Niall, 2025. "Requirements for trustworthy AI-enabled automated decision-making in the public sector: A systematic review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Fernanda Sobrino & Adolfo De Unánue T. & Edgar Hernández & Patricia Villa & Elena Villalobos & David Aké & Stephany Cisneros & Cristian Paul Camacho Osnay & Armando García Neri & Israel Hernández, 2026. "Designing AI for Prosecutorial Governance: Case Prioritization and Statutory Oversight in Mexico," Working Paper Series of the School of Government and Public Transformation 24, School of Governement and Public Transformation.
    4. Catalin VRABIE, 2024. "Guvernarea electronică 3.0: Un model AI de soluționare automatizată a petițiilor," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 12, pages 9-28, september.
    5. David Bendig & Antonio Bräunche, 2025. "The role of artificial intelligence algorithms in information systems research: a conceptual overview and avenues for research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 2863-2908, December.
    6. Shivam Gupta & Shampy Kamboj & Surajit Bag, 2023. "Role of Risks in the Development of Responsible Artificial Intelligence in the Digital Healthcare Domain," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 2257-2274, December.
    7. Michael Gerlich, 2024. "Public Anxieties About AI: Implications for Corporate Strategy and Societal Impact," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Ludmila-Daniela Manea & Iulian-Adrian Sorcaru & Mihaela-Carmen Muntean & Rozalia Nistor, 2025. "The Future of Digital Governance: A Bibliometric Exploration of Public Administration Transformation in the Era of e-Government and Artificial Intelligence," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 120-127.
    9. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:1906-1915 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Renée Sieber & Ana Brandusescu & Suthee Sangiambut & Abigail Adu-Daako, 2025. "What is civic participation in artificial intelligence?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(6), pages 1388-1406, July.
    11. Munaza Bibi & Tse Guan Tan & Heng Yao, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of AI Capabilities on Employee Well-Being: A Mediated Moderation Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    12. Oussama Najari & Cheklekbire Malainine, 2025. "Leveraging AI to Advance the Sustainable Development Goals in Morocco's Public Sector [Exploiter l'IA pour faire progresser les Objectifs de développement durable dans le secteur public marocain]," Post-Print hal-05110441, HAL.
    13. Kiruja Annie Rodah Nyawira & Dr Mary Nyawira Mwenda, 2025. "Strategic Integration of AI-Driven Project Management Systems in Public Sector Development Projects: A Comparative Study of Emerging and Advanced Economies," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 1174-1181, May.
    14. Maria VESOLOVSKA & Veronika KARKOVSKA & Oleh DUMA, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence In Public Administration: How The Emotional Intelligence Of Civil Servants Influences Its Effective Implementation," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2025(45), pages 27-45.
    15. Anca Florentina Vatamanu & Mihaela Tofan, 2025. "Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Public Administration: Challenges and Vulnerabilities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Khalid Alshehhi & Ali Cheaitou & Hamad Rashid, 2025. "Investigating risk elements and critical success factors for AI procurement projects in the public sector: a qualitative approach based on UAE public organisations," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(2), pages 446-467, February.
    17. Issara Sereewatthanawut & Patipan Sriphon & Pattrawut Khunwipusit & Babatunde Oluwaseun Ajayi & Ademola Enitan Ilesanmi & Jutarat Suwaree & Wonlop Writthym Buachoom, 2026. "Efficient AI-driven allegation screening: A case study of Thailand’s National Anti-Corruption Commission," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-20, January.
    18. Goran Trajkovski, 2024. "Bridging the public administration‐AI divide: A skills perspective," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(5), pages 412-426, December.
    19. Luca Grilli & Sergio Mariotti & Riccardo Marzano, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and shapeshifting capitalism," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 303-318, April.
    20. Marinko Skare & Beata Gavurova & Volodymyr Polishchuk, 2026. "Information-analytical system for evaluating artificial intelligence readiness and adoption in enterprises: a policy framework," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-28, March.
    21. Catalin Vrabie, 2023. "E-Government 3.0: An AI Model to Use for Enhanced Local Democracies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:283-:d:1705129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.