IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p1488-1504.html

Time Management in Handling Risks and Crises in Live Performance Television Show

Author

Listed:
  • Noorshahira Mohd Fadzil

    (Faculty of Film, Theatre and Animation, University Technology MARA, Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Affan Othman

    (Faculty of Film, Theatre and Animation, University Technology MARA, Malaysia)

Abstract

Live performance events are characterized by high visibility, intense scheduling, and a heightened potential for risk. This study investigates the intersection of risk and crisis management in the context of live performance television show in Malaysia. Using qualitative interviews, this research examines how safety concerns, technical hazards, and time constraints were identified, managed, and mitigated throughout the competition. Findings reveal four main categories of risks: performer safety, technical and equipment reliability, audience health, and financial/reputational vulnerabilities. Time management emerged as a pivotal factor in both preventing crises and responding adaptively when incidents occurred. The discussion situates these findings within broader theories of crisis management, live performance safety, and time psychology, highlighting the importance of relational trust, structured rehearsal, and proactive communication. Ultimately, the study contributes to the growing literature on risk and crisis in entertainment industries, providing insights applicable to event managers, stage managers, and researchers seeking to design safer, more resilient live performance environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Noorshahira Mohd Fadzil & Muhammad Affan Othman, 2025. "Time Management in Handling Risks and Crises in Live Performance Television Show," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 1488-1504, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:1488-1504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/1488-1504.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/time-management-in-handling-risks-and-crises-in-live-performance-television-show/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    2. Provan, David J. & Woods, David D. & Dekker, Sidney W.A. & Rae, Andrew J., 2020. "Safety II professionals: How resilience engineering can transform safety practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andres Mauricio Molina Barreto & Naoyuki Ishimura, 2023. "Remarks on a copula‐based conditional value at risk for the portfolio problem," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 150-170, July.
    2. Serpell Alfredo Federico & Ferrada Ximena & Rubio Larissa, 2019. "Measuring the performance of project risk management: a preliminary model," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1984-1991, January.
    3. Dilshad Ahmad & Muhammad Afzal, 2025. "Climate change flood risks and post-flood agricultural and non-agricultural economic losses in flood-prone Bait households Muzaffargarh district of Punjab, Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 18275-18311, August.
    4. Simon French, 2024. "Whose Judgement? Reflections on Elicitation in Bayesian Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 143-159, September.
    5. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    6. Michele Bonollo & Martino Grasselli & Gianmarco Mori & Havva Nilsu Oz, 2025. "Informative Risk Measures in the Banking Industry: A Proposal based on the Magnitude-Propensity Approach," Papers 2511.21556, arXiv.org.
    7. Mazurina Mohd Ali & Nur Shazwani Ab Hamid & Erlane K Ghani, 2019. "Examining the Relationship Between Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance in Malaysia," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 239-251, May.
    8. Chen, Chao & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik, 2021. "A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    9. Bożena Babiarz, 2018. "Aspects of Heat Supply Security Management Using Elements of Decision Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Leif Inge K. Sørskår & Eirik B. Abrahamsen, 2017. "On how to manage uncertainty when considering regulatory HSE interventions," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 97-116, November.
    11. O’Mahony, Stephen, 2025. "Suddenly with little or no warning: Learning from first person accounts of VFR into IMC," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    12. Davide Settembre-Blundo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Sonia Medina-Salgado & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 107-132, December.
    13. Gundula Glowka & Richard Hule & Anita Zehrer, 2024. "Risk perception of SMEs: strategic risks, family-related risks, external risks," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Julia Eichholz & Nicole Hoffmann & Anja Schwering, 2024. "The role of risk management orientation and the planning function of budgeting in enhancing organizational resilience and its effect on competitive advantages during times of crises," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 17-58, March.
    15. Maria Cheveresan & Cristian Stefan Dumitriu & Maria Stoica, 2024. "Environmental Economics in Flood Mitigation for River Basins and Cities," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 50-57, August.
    16. Sachin Modgil & Rohit Kumar Singh & Cyril Foropon, 2022. "Quality management in humanitarian operations and disaster relief management: a review and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1045-1098, December.
    17. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Stamatis Kontsas & Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2024. "Operational risk management in managerial accounting: a comprehensive examination of strategies and implementation in medium size organizations," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1-27, September.
    18. Avishag Boker & Einat Grimberg & Felix Tener & Joel Lanir, 2025. "Navigating the Last Mile: A Stakeholder Analysis of Delivery Robot Teleoperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-28, June.
    19. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:69-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Asu, John Otu & Hafeez, Khalid & Khoshnevis, Pegah, 2024. "DEA-driven risk management framework for oil supply chains," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    21. Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Alberto Pasanisi & Mathieu Couplet, 2017. "A critical discussion and practical recommendations on some issues relevant to the non-probabilistic treatment of uncertainty in engineering risk assessment," Post-Print hal-01652230, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:1488-1504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.