IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-4p1916-1938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Stakeholders’ Engagement Strategy- A Case of the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) in Lusaka, Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Tryphinah Mulalambuka

    (Graduate School of Business, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.)

  • Dr. Euston Kapotwe

    (Graduate School of Business, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.)

Abstract

The Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) holds the mandate to assess and collect taxes and duties, enforce relevant statutory provisions, facilitate international trade and plays a key advisory role in matters of tax policy. To promote greater tax compliance, the authority has successfully implemented a stakeholder engagement strategy, fostering collaboration and understanding among its partners and the broader community. The purpose of this research was to establish the effectiveness of the ZRA’s stakeholders’ engagement strategy, identify key barriers to effective stakeholder engagement, and propose evidence-based strategies for enhancing stakeholder collaboration and trust. Conducted at ZRA’s Head Office in Lusaka, the study utilised a descriptive research design that integrated both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Data was gathered from 72 respondents through structured interviews and questionnaires and subsequently analysed using regression analysis for quantitative data and saturation analysis for qualitative data. The results revealed that ZRA’s stakeholder engagement strategy is highly effective, with unanimous affirmation from respondents regarding its role in fostering trust, promoting tax compliance, and strengthening collaborative relationships. The strategy has achieved remarkable success in areas such as revenue collection, improved taxpayer awareness, and strengthening stakeholder relationships. Despite these achievements, challenges persist in effectively engaging underserved groups, including SMEs, informal traders, and users of online platforms. Additionally, systemic barriers such as limited access to digital platforms, inadequate communication, and resource constraints continue to hinder progress. Key barriers identified include a lack of awareness among stakeholders, challenges with system functionality, and the economic hardships that affect tax compliance. To address these issues, the proposed strategies focus on targeted outreach programs to reach underserved groups, improving digital inclusion through infrastructure investments, and establishing enhanced feedback mechanisms to build trust and collaboration. The proposals further emphasised expanding incentives such as tax holidays and recognition programmes to encourage compliance and reward stakeholders; and of improve communication channels and feedback mechanisms to foster transparency and trust. Leveraging partnerships with regulatory bodies and maximising the use of digital platforms were also key strategies aimed at broadening stakeholder engagement in ensuring more inclusive and efficient collaboration. This study concludes that while ZRA’s stakeholder engagement strategy aligns with its mission of fairness, efficiency, and sustainable revenue growth, addressing identified gaps will enhance collaboration, build trust, and achieve long-term compliance and revenue targets to support Zambia’s development goals. The key recommendation for achieving improved and effective engagement emphasises the necessity of fostering collaboration with stakeholders while prioritising capacity building.

Suggested Citation

  • Tryphinah Mulalambuka & Dr. Euston Kapotwe, 2025. "An Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Stakeholders’ Engagement Strategy- A Case of the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) in Lusaka, Zambia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 1916-1938, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:p:1916-1938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-4/1916-1938.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/an-assessment-of-the-effectiveness-of-the-stakeholders-engagement-strategy-a-case-of-the-zambia-revenue-authority-zra-in-lusaka-zambia/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roy Bahl & Richard M. Bird, 2018. "Fiscal Decentralization and Local Finance in Developing Countries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 17561.
    2. repec:eme:par000:par-11-2017-0092 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Gopnik, Morgan & Fieseler, Clare & Cantral, Laura & McClellan, Kate & Pendleton, Linwood & Crowder, Larry, 2012. "Coming to the table: Early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1139-1149.
    4. Pomeroy, Robert & Douvere, Fanny, 2008. "The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 816-822, September.
    5. Amanpreet Kaur & Sumit K. Lodhia, 2019. "Key issues and challenges in stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 2-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralph V Tafon, 2018. "Taking power to sea: Towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(2), pages 258-273, March.
    2. Brennan, Jonathon & Fitzsimmons, Clare & Gray, Tim & Raggatt, Laura, 2014. "EU marine strategy framework directive (MSFD) and marine spatial planning (MSP): Which is the more dominant and practicable contributor to maritime policy in the UK?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 359-366.
    3. Scarff, Gavin & Fitzsimmons, Clare & Gray, Tim, 2015. "The new mode of marine planning in the UK: Aspirations and challenges," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 96-102.
    4. Wehner, Nicholas & Day, Jon C., 2017. "Effective public participation is fundamental for marine conservation - lessons from a large scale MPA," MarXiv 9jk7v, Center for Open Science.
    5. Emma McKinley & Oscar Aller-Rojas & Caroline Hattam & Celine Germond-Duret & Inés Vicuña San Martín & Charlotte Rachael Hopkins & Héctor Aponte & Tavis Potts, 2019. "Charting the course for a blue economy in Peru: a research agenda," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 2253-2275, October.
    6. Ryan B. Stoa, 2014. "Cooperative Federalism in Biscayne National Park," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 56-100.
    7. Manuel E. Lago & Santiago Lago-Peñas & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2024. "On the effects of intergovernmental grants: a survey," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(3), pages 856-908, June.
    8. Ranger, S. & Kenter, J.O. & Bryce, R. & Cumming, G. & Dapling, T. & Lawes, E. & Richardson, P.B., 2016. "Forming shared values in conservation management: An interpretive-deliberative-democratic approach to including community voices," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 344-357.
    9. Marilena Papageorgiou & Georgia Pozoukidou & Theodora Istoriou & Theoni Kostopoulou, 2024. "Inclusive Maritime Spatial Planning: Stakes at the Regional Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
    10. repec:plo:pone00:0161321 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Roy W. Bahl & Andrey Timofeev & Serdar Yilmaz, 2022. "Implementing federalism: The case of Nepal," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 23-40, September.
    12. Hiroaki Sugino & Tatsuya Sekiguchi & Yuuki Terada & Naoki Hayashi, 2023. "“Future Compass”, a Tool That Allows Us to See the Right Horizon—Integration of Topic Modeling and Multiple-Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Epstein, Gil S. & Gang, Ira N., 2019. "Taxation and social protection under governance decentralisation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    14. Peter Arbo & Thuy Pham Thi Thanh, 2014. "The missing link in marine ecosystem-based management," ERSA conference papers ersa14p248, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Paul Smoke, 2019. "Improving Subnational Government Development Finance in Emerging and Developing Economies: Towards a Strategic Approach," Working Papers id:13007, eSocialSciences.
    16. Ramírez, Alejandro & Ortiz, Marco & Steenbeek, Jeroen & Christensen, Villy, 2015. "Evaluation of the effects on rockfish and kelp artisanal fisheries of the proposed Mejillones Peninsula marine protected area (northern Chile, SE Pacific coast)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 141-153.
    17. Namatama, Nathan, 2020. "An assessment of stakeholders’ participation in land use planning process of Luapula Province Planning Authority," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Röckmann, Christine & van Leeuwen, Judith & Goldsborough, David & Kraan, Marloes & Piet, Gerjan, 2015. "The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem based management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 155-162.
    19. Ardron, Jeff A. & Clark, Malcolm R. & Penney, Andrew J. & Hourigan, Thomas F. & Rowden, Ashley A. & Dunstan, Piers K. & Watling, Les & Shank, Timothy M. & Tracey, Di M. & Dunn, Mathew R. & Parker, Ste, 2014. "A systematic approach towards the identification and protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 146-154.
    20. Hynes, Stephen & Norton, Danny & Corless, Rebecca, 2013. "Public Perceptions of the Irish Marine Environment," Working Papers 160056, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    21. Quero García, Pablo & Chica Ruiz, Juan Adolfo & García Sanabria, Javier, 2020. "Blue energy and marine spatial planning in Southern Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:p:1916-1938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.