IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-3p415-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of environmental risks associated with scavenging activities: Echoes from around landfills in Nigerian Megacity

Author

Listed:
  • Gbemiga Bolade Faniran

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)

  • Olanrewaju Timothy Dada

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Nigeria)

  • Adewunmi Samson Adedayo

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)

Abstract

This study examines the perceptions of residents living near the Olusosun and Solus II landfills in Lagos, Nigeria, where daily scavenging activities pose environmental and health risks. Utilizing a systematic sampling method, 161 respondents within a 900-meter radius of the landfills were surveyed, achieving a 90.7% response rate. The findings indicate that socio-economic attributes significantly influence residents’ concerns about scavenging activities. The perception of risks, including pollution, crime, and hazardous conditions, was consistent across different zones despite variations in age and educational status. Respondents expressed high concern regarding the unsanitary nature of scavenging activities, linking them to increased crime and environmental degradation. Spatial analysis revealed that residents’ proximity to the landfills did not significantly affect their perceived risk severity (F = 0.450; p = .642). However, the level of concern decreased with increased distance from the landfills. Socio-economic factors, including income and length of residence, were key determinants of risk perception. Notably, factors such as rootedness of place, sense of community, and place identity influenced residents’ decisions to remain in the area despite known hazards. Emotional bonds and economic dependencies contributed to a reluctance to relocate. The study underscores the need for policy interventions that incorporate bottom-up approaches, engaging both residents and scavengers in decision-making processes. This research highlights the complex interplay between socio-economic, cultural, and environmental factors in shaping risk perception, providing insights for regulatory frameworks to manage urban landfills and mitigate associated risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Gbemiga Bolade Faniran & Olanrewaju Timothy Dada & Adewunmi Samson Adedayo, 2025. "Perception of environmental risks associated with scavenging activities: Echoes from around landfills in Nigerian Megacity," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 415-427, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-3:p:415-427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-3/415-427.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/perception-of-environmental-risks-associated-with-scavenging-activities-echoes-from-around-landfills-in-nigerian-megacity/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frondel, Manuel & Simora, Michael & Sommer, Stephan, 2017. "Risk Perception of Climate Change: Empirical Evidence for Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 173-183.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gagliarducci, Stefano & Paserman, M. Daniele & Patacchini, Eleonora, 2019. "Hurricanes, Climate Change Policies and Electoral Accountability," IZA Discussion Papers 12334, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Shan Jin & Yasuhiro Matsuoka & Meng Yue & Glyn Jones & Lynn J. Frewer, 2024. "Does information about environmental considerations affect Chinese and UK consumers’ purchase intentions for traced foods? A path analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 32287-32318, December.
    3. Donatella Baiardi, 2021. "What do you think about climate change?," Working Papers 477, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2021.
    4. Baiardi, Donatella & Morana, Claudio, 2021. "Climate change awareness: Empirical evidence for the European Union," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Hasibuan, Abdul Muis & Gregg, Daniel & Stringer, Randy, 2020. "Accounting for diverse risk attitudes in measures of risk perceptions: A case study of climate change risk for small-scale citrus farmers in Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Selim Jürgen Ergun & Zehra D. Karadeniz & M. Fernanda Rivas, 2024. "Climate change risk perception in Europe: country-level factors and gender differences," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Andor, Mark A. & Osberghaus, Daniel & Simora, Michael, 2020. "Natural Disasters and Governmental Aid: Is there a Charity Hazard?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Houari, Oussama & Bennani, Hamza & Bro de Comères, Quentin, 2025. "Climate risks and economic activity in France: Evidence from media coverage," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    9. Galina Hale, 2024. "Climate Disasters and Exchange Rates: Are Beliefs Keeping up with Climate Change?," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 72(1), pages 253-291, March.
    10. Lloyd S. Davis & Bienvenido León & Michael J. Bourk & Lei Zhu & Wiebke Finkler, 2022. "Infotainment May Increase Engagement with Science but It Can Decrease Perceptions of Seriousness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Moinul Islam & Koji Kotani, 2020. "Who perceive seasonality change? A case of the Meghna basin, Bangladesh," Working Papers SDES-2020-15, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Dec 2020.
    12. Frondel Manuel & Matejko Leonie & Osberghaus Daniel & Sommer Stephan & Vance Colin, 2023. "Green SÖP Extended: The Socio-Ecological Panel Surveys 2020 and 2022," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 243(5), pages 567-583, October.
    13. Nanda Kaji Budhathoki & Douglas Paton & Jonatan A. Lassa & Gopal Datt Bhatta & Kerstin K. Zander, 2020. "Heat, cold, and floods: exploring farmers’ motivations to adapt to extreme weather events in the Terai region of Nepal," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3213-3237, September.
    14. Donatella Baiardi, 2021. "What do you think about climate change?," Working Paper series 21-16, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    15. Islam, Moinul & Kotani, Koji & Managi, Shunsuke, 2024. "Nature dependence and seasonality change perceptions for climate adaptation and mitigation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 34-44.
    16. Victor Matanggaran & Jan M. Gutteling, 2021. "Explaining Risk Perception of Climate Change in Indonesia through Cultural Dimension of Uncertainty Avoidance, Collectivistic, and Long-term Orientation," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(5), pages 336-345, May.
    17. Ovielt Baltodano Lopez & Federico Bassetti & Giulia Carallo & Roberto Casarin, 2022. "First-order integer-valued autoregressive processes with Generalized Katz innovations," Papers 2202.02029, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    18. Seol-A Kwon & Seoyong Kim & Jae Eun Lee, 2019. "Analyzing the Determinants of Individual Action on Climate Change by Specifying the Roles of Six Values in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, March.
    19. Jinjia Wu & Jiansheng Qu & Hengji Li & Li Xu & Hongfen Zhang & Suman Aryal & Jingjing Zeng & Yujie Fan & Qin Wei & Xiafei Liu, 2018. "What Affects Chinese Residents’ Perceptions of Climate Change?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Samuel Tomczyk & Maxi Rahn & Henriette Markwart & Silke Schmidt, 2021. "A Walk in the Park? Examining the Impact of App-Based Weather Warnings on Affective Reactions and the Search for Information in a Virtual City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-3:p:415-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.