IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/ncafaa/v5y2021p35-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symmetric Prudence in New Definitions of Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Shkulipa Liudmyla

    (National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit: Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Since the version of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting is revised, the interest in accounting concepts that are fundamental in financial reporting has been growing. The purpose of this article is to investigate the evolutionary logic of prudence in the definitions and recognition criteria of assets and liabilities, the causes and consequences of new changes in the Conceptual Framework of 2018. As a result, it was obtained that different interpretations of probability and asymmetric asset and liability identification caused the new changes. The reconciliation between the intentions of new asset and liabilities definitions and their correct understanding results has been illustrated. The new complication in defining obligation such as “no practical ability to avoid†was found. In conclusion, we constant the new definitions as the positive consequence from a psychological point of view, simplifying individuals judgments, as from a conceptual point of view, leading to the common understanding and improvements of qualitative characteristics of financial information. The direct evidence of conceptual improvement is symmetric prudence as support of financial statements’ fundamental qualitative characteristics – faithful representation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shkulipa Liudmyla, 2021. "Symmetric Prudence in New Definitions of Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting," New Challenges in Accounting and Finance, EUROKD, vol. 5, pages 35-49.
  • Handle: RePEc:bco:ncafaa::v:5:y:2021:p:35-49
    DOI: 10.32038/NCAF.2021.05.03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/468/NCAF.2021.05.03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32038/NCAF.2021.05.03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:ncafaa::v:5:y:2021:p:35-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.