IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbz/fcpbbr/v14y2017i5p528-543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Strategy: A Quasi-Experiment on the Number And Location of Suppliers

Author

Listed:
  • André Luis de Castro Moura Duarte

    (Insper)

  • Rafael Borges de Souza

    (Insper)

  • Flávio Romero Macau

    (Universidade Paulista - UNIP)

  • Leandro Januario de Souza

    (Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE)

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the impact of a second supply source on price, quality and stock levels at the purchasing company. Relevance: The supply strategy defines how many suppliers an item should have and where it should be located. If working with a single supplier may bring relational benefits, working with multiple sources may reduce opportunism risks. If a local supplier reaps benefits on account of its proximity, a global supplier may result in lower costs. Methodology: The quasi-experimental method was used to follow-up a purchasing policy change at an auto parts company, which took on a second supply source for low complexity items. The research collected data on costs, quality and stock coverage for 1,480 items between 2007 and 2012, analysing new supplier’s entrance and location. Results: Introducing a second supplier reduced the price, especially when a new international supplier was introduced. Decreases in quality or increases in stock coverage were not observed.

Suggested Citation

  • André Luis de Castro Moura Duarte & Rafael Borges de Souza & Flávio Romero Macau & Leandro Januario de Souza, 2017. "Supply Strategy: A Quasi-Experiment on the Number And Location of Suppliers," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(5), pages 528-543, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:14:y:2017:i:5:p528-543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/download/66/102
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davis, Edward W., 1992. "Global outsourcing: Have U.S. managers thrown the baby out with the bath water?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 58-65.
    2. Banri Ito & Eiichi Tomiura & Ryuhei Wakasugi, 2011. "Offshore Outsourcing and Productivity: Evidence from Japanese Firm‐level Data Disaggregated by Tasks," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(3), pages 555-567, August.
    3. Gad Allon & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2010. "Global Dual Sourcing: Tailored Base-Surge Allocation to Near- and Offshore Production," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 110-124, January.
    4. Yu, Haisheng & Zeng, Amy Z. & Zhao, Lindu, 2009. "Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 788-800, August.
    5. Cuihong Li & Laurens G. Debo, 2009. "Second Sourcing vs. Sole Sourcing with Capacity Investment and Asymmetric Information," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 448-470, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Belavina & Karan Girotra, 2012. "The Relational Advantages of Intermediation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(9), pages 1614-1631, September.
    2. Sillanpää, Ville & Liesiö, Juuso & Käki, Anssi, 2021. "Procurement decisions over multiple periods under piecewise-linear shortage costs and fixed capacity commitments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Eduard Calvo & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2016. "Sourcing Strategies and Supplier Incentives for Short-Life-Cycle Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 436-455, February.
    4. Qi, Lian & Shi, Jim (Junmin) & Xu, Xiaowei, 2015. "Supplier competition and its impact on firm׳s sourcing strategy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 91-110.
    5. Silbermayr, Lena & Minner, Stefan, 2016. "Dual sourcing under disruption risk and cost improvement through learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 226-238.
    6. Qi, Lian & Lee, Kangbok, 2015. "Supply chain risk mitigations with expedited shipping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 98-113.
    7. Basu, Preetam & Avittathur, Balram, 2018. "Pricing and sourcing strategies for competing retailers in supply chains under disruption riskAuthor-Name: Kumar, Milan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 533-543.
    8. Maheswar Singh Mahapatra & Pravash Chandra Pradhan & J. K. Jha, 2022. "Sourcing decisions with order allocation under supply disruption risk considering quantitative and qualitative criteria," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3291-3333, September.
    9. Giacomo Calzolari & Leonardo Felli & Johannes Koenen & Giancarlo Spagnolo & Konrad O. Stahl, 2021. "Relational Contracts and Trust in a High-Tech Industry," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_316, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    10. Dong, Chuanwen & Transchel, Sandra, 2020. "A dual sourcing inventory model for modal split transport: Structural properties and optimal solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 883-900.
    11. Jihee Han & KwangSup Shin, 2016. "Evaluation mechanism for structural robustness of supply chain considering disruption propagation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 135-151, January.
    12. Kizito Elijah Kanyoma & James Kamwachale Khomba & Eric James Sankhulani & Rabiya Hanif, 2013. "Sourcing Strategy and Supply Chain Risk Management in the Healthcare Sector: A Case Study of Malawi¡¯s Public Healthcare Delivery Supply Chain," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(3), pages 16-26, August.
    13. Yanting Huang & Zongjun Wang, 2017. "Dual-Recycling Channel Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Cost Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, November.
    14. Arts, Joachim & Kiesmüller, Gudrun P., 2013. "Analysis of a two-echelon inventory system with two supply modes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 263-272.
    15. Rika Ampuh Hadiguna, 2012. "Decision support framework for risk assessment of sustainable supply chain," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1/2), pages 35-54.
    16. Steffen T. Klosterhalfen & Stefan Minner & Sean P. Willems, 2014. "Strategic Safety Stock Placement in Supply Networks with Static Dual Supply," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 204-219, May.
    17. Davide Luzzini & Stefano Ronchi, 2016. "Cinderella purchasing transformation: linking purchasing status to purchasing practices and business performance," Post-Print hal-01289902, HAL.
    18. Azad, Nader & Hassini, Elkafi, 2019. "Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 481-501.
    19. N. Knofius & M. C. Heijden & A. Sleptchenko & W. H. M. Zijm, 2021. "Improving effectiveness of spare parts supply by additive manufacturing as dual sourcing option," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 189-221, March.
    20. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:14:y:2017:i:5:p528-543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Lasso (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fucapbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.