IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00010/v2y2023i2p75-96d197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Stability of Green Transformation Strategy of Manufacturing Enterprises under Multi-dimensional Environmental Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Qin

    (School of Business, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China)

  • Sufeng Li

    (School of Business, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China)

  • Haiyong Jiang

    (School of Business, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China)

  • Zhenyu Chen

    (Affairs Service Center of Ecological Environment of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China)

  • Chuanlong Ma

    (Business Management of Business School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK)

Abstract

Giving full play to the interaction of multi-dimensional environmental regulation is an important method to accelerate the green transformation of manufacturing enterprises which is a significant way to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. Based on the theory of evolution game, a green transformation strategy evolution game model participated by the government, consumers, and manufacturing enterprises has been constructed. Stability research is conducted based on the behavioral mode of the three parties participating subjects and the paper uses MATLAB for numerical simulation to analyze the impact of environmental regulations of different dimensions on the green transformation of enterprises. The research shows that: (1) When the government adopts a single environmental regulation of carbon emission right transaction or green consumption subsidy, it will not affect the choice of green transformation strategies of the enterprise. (2) When the government adopts a single environmental regulation of environmental protection tax, it only promotes enterprises to choose green transformation strategies under limited conditions. (3) Under the multi-dimensional environmental regulations of the government, by affecting the cost and income of enterprise green technology innovation, consumers’ green consumption behavior, and the manufacturing enterprises choose green transformation as a stable strategy. Therefore, the government should give full play to the role of multi-dimensional environmental regulations in promoting consumers' green consumption and enterprises’ green technology innovation to accelerate the green transformation of manufacturing enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Qin & Sufeng Li & Haiyong Jiang & Zhenyu Chen & Chuanlong Ma, 2023. "Research on Stability of Green Transformation Strategy of Manufacturing Enterprises under Multi-dimensional Environmental Regulation," Review of Economic Assessment, Anser Press, vol. 2(2), pages 75-96, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00010:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:75-96:d:197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/rea/2/2/15/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/rea/2/2/15
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Yugang & Han, Xiaoya & Hu, Guiping, 2016. "Optimal production for manufacturers considering consumer environmental awareness and green subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 397-408.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Deng Xu & Yong Long, 2019. "The Impact of Government Subsidy on Renewable Microgrid Investment Considering Double Externalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Deyan Yang & Jinyong Wang & Dongping Song, 2019. "Channel Structure Strategies of Supply Chains with Varying Green Cost and Governmental Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Szilvia Molnár & László Szőllősi, 2020. "Sustainability and Quality Aspects of Different Table Egg Production Systems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Shuiwang Zhang & Qianlan Ding & Jingcheng Ding, 2023. "Return Strategy of E-Commerce Platform Based on Green and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Fan, Ruguo & Dong, Lili, 2018. "The dynamic analysis and simulation of government subsidy strategies in low-carbon diffusion considering the behavior of heterogeneous agents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 252-262.
    7. Zhang, Dengjun & Xie, Yifan, 2022. "Customer environmental concerns and profit margin: Evidence from manufacturing firms," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Liming Zhao & Ling Li & Yao Song & Cong Li & Yujie Wu, 2018. "Research on Pricing and Coordination Strategy of a Sustainable Green Supply Chain with a Capital-Constrained Retailer," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-12, January.
    9. Juan Zhang & Ziyue Wang & Huiju Zhao, 2020. "The Impact of Consumer Subsidy on Green Technology Innovations for Vehicles and Environmental Impact," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Cong Wang & Zongbao Zou & Shidao Geng, 2021. "Green Technology Investment in a Decentralized Supply Chain under Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Maryam Shoaeinaeini & Kannan Govindan & Donya Rahmani, 2022. "Pricing policy in green supply chain design: the impact of consumer environmental awareness and green subsidies," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3989-4028, September.
    12. Ihwan Ghazali & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid & Siti Zawiah Md Dawal & Irianto Irianto & Safarudin Gazali Herawan & Fu-Haw Ho & Rohana Abdullah & Amir Hamzah Abdul Rasib & Nur Wardah Sufina Padzil, 2023. "Embedding Green Product Attributes Preferences and Cultural Consideration for Product Design Development: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Qingfeng Meng & Hongming Zhu & Zhen Li & Jianguo Du & Xiangyu Wang & Mi Jeong Kim, 2018. "How Green Building Product Decisions from Customers Can Be Transitioned to Manufacturers: An Agent-Based Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Han, Xiaoya & Liu, Xin, 2020. "Equilibrium decisions for multi-firms considering consumer quality preference," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Guitao Zhang & Xiao Zhang & Hao Sun & Xinyu Zhao, 2021. "Three-Echelon Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Equilibrium under Cap-and-Trade Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, June.
    16. Farzana Quoquab & Jihad Mohammad, 2020. "Cognitive, Affective and Conative Domains of Sustainable Consumption: Scale Development and Validation Using Confirmatory Composite Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Weiling Wang & Yongjian Wang & Xiaoqing Zhang & Dalin Zhang, 2021. "Effects of Government Subsidies on Production and Emissions Reduction Decisions under Carbon Tax Regulation and Consumer Low-Carbon Awareness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Lili Ding & Zhimeng Guo & Yuemei Xue, 2023. "Dump or recycle? Consumer's environmental awareness and express package disposal based on an evolutionary game model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6963-6986, July.
    19. Lingzhi Shao & Qianwen Liu, 2022. "Decision-Making and the Contract of the Complementary Product Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Environmental Awareness and Government Green Subsidies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-27, March.
    20. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Zangiabadi, Maryam & Hafezi, Maryam, 2023. "How much is enough? Government subsidies in supporting green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1316-1333.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00010:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:75-96:d:197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.