IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00001/v3y2024i3p138-160d220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similarities and differences between digitalization indexes

Author

Listed:
  • Olena Korzhyk

    (Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Jorge Vareda Gomes

    (Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Gonçalo João

    (Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Digitalization is nowadays one of the fastest developing processes. The adoption of digital technologies can provide innumerous opportunities for the organizations to evolve and gain competitive advantage by leveraging of technologies to respond to dynamic expectations and demands. Information about the country digitalization level is essential to decision makers in both public and private organizations. It can present insights on which areas need the most investment, and furthermore to gain feedback on the outcomes of these investments. For companies, it can create a certain predictability on which products and services will be required the most. To assess the evolution of this process in different countries, various indexes were proposed and employed by different corporations. The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) and ICT Development Index (IDI) are used by public organizations. Digitalization Index (DiGiX) and Cisco Digital Readiness Index (CISCO) are used by private companies. Comparing two sectors highlights the most common factors of digital evaluation. Indexes are analyzed thoroughly by their structure, coverage, weights, methodology and ranking. The result of the practical work is a equivalence table which shows the percentage of their similarity. Additionally, a new digitalization index is proposed, based on the result of the previous comparison, which can be applied to analyze both public and private sector of the country’s digitalization level.

Suggested Citation

  • Olena Korzhyk & Jorge Vareda Gomes & Gonçalo João, 2024. "Similarities and differences between digitalization indexes," Journal of Economic Analysis, Anser Press, vol. 3(3), pages 138-160, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00001:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:138-160:d:220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/3/3/70/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/3/3/70
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taku Nemoto & Javier López González, 2021. "Digital trade inventory: Rules, standards and principles," OECD Trade Policy Papers 251, OECD Publishing.
    2. Saarikko, Ted & Westergren, Ulrika H. & Blomquist, Tomas, 2020. "Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 825-839.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Jinlong & Shi, Yang & Song, Xiaowei, 2024. "The dynamics of digitalization and natural resources in shaping the sustainable development agenda in BRICS-T nations," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danuso, Anna & Giones, Ferran & Ribeiro da Silva, Elias, 2022. "The digital transformation of industrial players," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 341-349.
    2. Cong Cheng & Hongfang Cui, 2024. "Combining digital and legacy technologies: firm digital transformation strategies—evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Youssef Es-Sadat & Mohammed Belbachir, 2025. "Resilience of logistics supply chains and the development of innovative entrepreneurship in Morocco [Résilience des supply chaînes logistiques et développement de l’entrepreneuriat innovant au Maro," Post-Print hal-05021257, HAL.
    4. repec:ehu:cuader:69660 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Angelina Roša (Rosha) & Liudmila Lobanova, 2022. "Ethical Responsibility of a Company in the Context of Digital Transformation of Work: Conceptual Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-29, September.
    7. Shi, Hongyu & Liu, Yu & Yang, Yaru, 2024. "Enterprise digital transformation and supply chain stability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Wang, Teng & Zhao, Xiaoyang & Li, Xiaotong, 2025. "Geographical influences, media attention and enterprise digital transformation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Nie, Jun & Jian, Xin & Xu, Juanjuan & Xu, Nuo & Jiang, Tangyang & Yu, Yang, 2024. "The effect of corporate social responsibility practices on digital transformation in China: A resource-based view," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-15.
    10. Jianhua Zhu & Julien S. Baker & Zhiting Song & Xiao-Guang Yue & Wenqi Li, 2023. "Government regulatory policies for digital transformation in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: an evolutionary game analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Yunsi Chen & Sumin Hu & Haoqiang Wu, 2023. "The Digital Economy, Green Technology Innovation, and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Bruno Siano Rêgo & Shital Jayantilal & João J. Ferreira & Elias G. Carayannis, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Strategic Management: a Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 3195-3222, December.
    13. Hongtao Wang & Wencheng Cao & Fei Wang, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Manufacturing Firm Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    14. McCarthy, Pat & Sammon, David & Alhassan, Ibrahim, 2024. "The characteristics of digital transformation leadership: Theorizing the practitioner voice," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 411-423.
    15. Plekhanov, Dmitry & Franke, Henrik & Netland, Torbjørn H., 2023. "Digital transformation: A review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 821-844.
    16. Zhang, Yuting & Chin, Tachia & Al-Wazer, Ragwa, 2025. "Good neighbors but bad employers? How corporate digital transformation affects incongruence between external and internal corporate social responsibility," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    17. Vladimir Franki & Darin Majnarić & Alfredo Višković, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Companies in the Power Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, January.
    18. Melinda Timea Fülöp & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Dan Ioan Topor, 2025. "Digital business world and ethical dilemmas: a systematic literature review," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 23-41, March.
    19. Liu, Ju & Vigren, Olli, 2024. "Managing Digital Transformation for Innovation: A Multi-Level and Multi-Dimensional Integrated Model for Managers," Papers in Innovation Studies 2024/18, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    20. Qiao, Penghua & Liu, Siting & Fung, Hung-Gay & Wang, Chen, 2024. "Corporate green innovation in a digital economy," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 870-883.
    21. Liang, Zhentang & Zhao, Yunying, 2024. "Enterprise digital transformation and stock price crash risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00001:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:138-160:d:220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.