IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00001/v3y2024i3p138-160d220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similarities and differences between digitalization indexes

Author

Listed:
  • Olena Korzhyk

    (Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Jorge Vareda Gomes

    (Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Gonçalo João

    (Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Digitalization is nowadays one of the fastest developing processes. The adoption of digital technologies can provide innumerous opportunities for the organizations to evolve and gain competitive advantage by leveraging of technologies to respond to dynamic expectations and demands. Information about the country digitalization level is essential to decision makers in both public and private organizations. It can present insights on which areas need the most investment, and furthermore to gain feedback on the outcomes of these investments. For companies, it can create a certain predictability on which products and services will be required the most. To assess the evolution of this process in different countries, various indexes were proposed and employed by different corporations. The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) and ICT Development Index (IDI) are used by public organizations. Digitalization Index (DiGiX) and Cisco Digital Readiness Index (CISCO) are used by private companies. Comparing two sectors highlights the most common factors of digital evaluation. Indexes are analyzed thoroughly by their structure, coverage, weights, methodology and ranking. The result of the practical work is a equivalence table which shows the percentage of their similarity. Additionally, a new digitalization index is proposed, based on the result of the previous comparison, which can be applied to analyze both public and private sector of the country’s digitalization level.

Suggested Citation

  • Olena Korzhyk & Jorge Vareda Gomes & Gonçalo João, 2024. "Similarities and differences between digitalization indexes," Journal of Economic Analysis, Anser Press, vol. 3(3), pages 138-160, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00001:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:138-160:d:220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/3/3/70/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/3/3/70
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taku Nemoto & Javier López González, 2021. "Digital trade inventory: Rules, standards and principles," OECD Trade Policy Papers 251, OECD Publishing.
    2. Saarikko, Ted & Westergren, Ulrika H. & Blomquist, Tomas, 2020. "Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 825-839.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Jianhua Zhu & Julien S. Baker & Zhiting Song & Xiao-Guang Yue & Wenqi Li, 2023. "Government regulatory policies for digital transformation in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: an evolutionary game analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Yunsi Chen & Sumin Hu & Haoqiang Wu, 2023. "The Digital Economy, Green Technology Innovation, and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Hongtao Wang & Wencheng Cao & Fei Wang, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Manufacturing Firm Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Vladimir Franki & Darin Majnarić & Alfredo Višković, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Companies in the Power Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, January.
    6. Rodrigues, Ana Rita D. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Teixeira, Fernando J.C.S.N. & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, digital transformation and cybersecurity in the banking sector: A multi-stakeholder cognition-driven framework," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Fabricia S. Rosa & Lorenzo Compagnucci & Rogerio J. Lunkes & Januário J. Monteiro, 2023. "Green innovation ecosystem and water performance in the food service industry: The effects of environmental management controls and digitalization," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5459-5476, December.
    8. Singh, Shiwangi & Sharma, Meenakshi & Dhir, Sanjay, 2021. "Modeling the effects of digital transformation in Indian manufacturing industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Petratos, Pythagoras N., 2021. "Misinformation, disinformation, and fake news: Cyber risks to business," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 763-774.
    10. Elvira NICA & Anamaria MIȘA & Mihaela MELENCIUC, 2023. "How Do We Ensure The Qualification Of Civil Servants With Digital Skills In Europe? A Comparative Study," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(3), pages 40-51, December.
    11. Zhi-Guang Li & Yanrui Wu & Yao-Kuang Li, 2023. "Technical Founders, Digital Transformation and Corporate Technological Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China’s STAR Market," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 23-03, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    12. Marta Gotz & Barbara Jankowska, 2020. "Systemic Change: Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies and Company Competitiveness: Case Studies from a Post-Transition Economy," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(4), pages 61-78.
    13. Yan, Lina & Ling, Xuan & Wang, Zhitao & Xu, Yinuo, 2023. "Can mixed-ownership reform boost the digital transformation of state-owned enterprises?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 647-663.
    14. Danuso, Anna & Giones, Ferran & Ribeiro da Silva, Elias, 2022. "The digital transformation of industrial players," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 341-349.
    15. Angelina Roša (Rosha) & Liudmila Lobanova, 2022. "Ethical Responsibility of a Company in the Context of Digital Transformation of Work: Conceptual Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-29, September.
    16. Bruno Siano Rêgo & Shital Jayantilal & João J. Ferreira & Elias G. Carayannis, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Strategic Management: a Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 3195-3222, December.
    17. Lavinia-Andreea GRUIA & Alexandru ROJA & Nicolae BIBU & Marian NASTASE, 2021. "Education as the Main Entry Point in a Digitally Transformed Future of Work," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 155-167.
    18. Xiurui Xu & Guangming Hou & Junpeng Wang, 2022. "Research on Digital Transformation Based on Complex Systems: Visualization of Knowledge Maps and Construction of a Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Hamann-Lohmer, Jacob & Bendig, Miriam & Lasch, Rainer, 2023. "Investigating the impact of digital transformation on relationship and collaboration dynamics in supply chains and manufacturing networks – A multi-case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    20. Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Khan, Zaheer & Wood, Geoffrey & Knight, Gary, 2021. "COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 602-611.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00001:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:138-160:d:220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.