IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2022i8p3-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Electricity Trade in South East Europe – Findings from a Panel Structural Gravity Model

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitar Zlatinov
  • Nedko Kosev
  • Stoyan Shalamanov

Abstract

The paper discusses whether the electricity trade in South East Europe in 1990-2019 is driven by fundamentals or, like other commodities, one could argue for a speculative movement of electricity flows motivated by factors such as prices. We employ a panel structural gravity model on the example of Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia, Republic of North Macedonia, Greece, Turkey, and Hungary to study the dependence between net exports, generation, and consumption of electricity, as well as the regulations in the field of exporting electricity. We find that domestic consumption of electricity is a much stronger factor than the generation when considering foreign trade in electricity. The construction of power capacity in the countries considered is much more oriented towards the domestic market, which results in an underdeveloped interconnection between them. This is a serious obstacle to the liberalization on the electricity market in the region and its integration into pan-European market structures. It also creates conditions for maintaining higher and volatile electricity prices and, consequently, negatively affects economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitar Zlatinov & Nedko Kosev & Stoyan Shalamanov, 2022. "Regional Electricity Trade in South East Europe – Findings from a Panel Structural Gravity Model," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 8, pages 3-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2022:i:8:p:3-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iki.bas.bg/Journals/EconomicStudies/2022/2022-8/01_Zlatinov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    2. Peter Cramton, 2017. "Electricity market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 589-612.
    3. Piermartini, Roberta & Yotov, Yoto, 2016. "Estimating Trade Policy Effects with Structural Gravity," School of Economics Working Paper Series 2016-10, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
    4. Craig S. Hakkio & Jun Nie, 2014. "Implications of recent U.S. energy trends for trade forecasts," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue Q IV, pages 29-51.
    5. Mario Larch & Yoto V. Yotov, 2016. "General Equilibrium Trade Policy Analysis with Structural Gravity," CESifo Working Paper Series 6020, CESifo.
    6. B. Venkatraja, 2021. "Dynamics of Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: A Panel Estimation of Net Oil Importing Countries," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 63-89.
    7. Massimo Filippini, 1999. "Swiss residential demand for electricity," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(8), pages 533-538.
    8. Nevena Byanova, 2021. "Effects of the EU Electricity Markets Opening on Competition and Prices," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 35-69.
    9. Antweiler, Werner, 2016. "Cross-border trade in electricity," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 42-51.
    10. Joan Batalla, Jordi Paniagua, and Elisa Trujillo-Baute, 2019. "Energy Market Integration and Electricity Trade," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    11. Akihiro Otsuka, 2015. "Demand for industrial and commercial electricity: evidence from Japan," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. J. M. C. Santos Silva & Silvana Tenreyro, 2011. "poisson: Some convergence issues," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 11(2), pages 215-225, June.
    13. Atanas Georgiev, 2018. "Integrating Renewable Energy Sources In A Liberalized Electricity Market," Yearbook of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria, vol. 16(1), pages 115-123, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gaziza Yessenzholova & Raushan Dulambayeva & Saltanat Kapysheva, 2023. "Assessment of the Impact of Customs Regulation Factor on Foreign Trade of Kazakhstan," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 66-81.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zouheir El-Sahli, 2023. "The Partial and General Equilibrium Effects of the Greater Arab Free Trade Agreement," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 185-199, March.
    2. Scott L. Baier & Amanda Kerr & Yoto V. Yotov, 2018. "Gravity, distance, and international trade," Chapters, in: Bruce A. Blonigen & Wesley W. Wilson (ed.), Handbook of International Trade and Transportation, chapter 2, pages 15-78, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Agnosteva, Delina E. & Anderson, James E. & Yotov, Yoto V., 2019. "Intra-national trade costs: Assaying regional frictions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 32-50.
    4. Iliev, Dragomir & Stefanov, Galin & Yotov, Yoto, 2016. "Estimating Bulgaria’S Trade Borders With The Eu An Application Of The Empirical Gravity Model Of Trade," Business Management, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 1-3.
    5. Mario Larch & Yoto Yotov, 2017. "On the impact of TTIP in Southeastern and Eastern Europe: A quantitative analysis," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 54-73,74-92.
    6. Harald Oberhofer & Michael Pfaffermayr & Richard Sellner, 2021. "Revisiting time as a trade barrier: Evidence from a panel structural gravity model," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1382-1417, November.
    7. Suhas Jadhav & Ishita Ghosh, 2024. "Future Prospects of the Gravity Model of Trade: A Bibliometric Review (1993–2021)," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 59(1), pages 26-61, February.
    8. Borchert, Ingo & Yotov, Yoto V., 2017. "Distance, globalization, and international trade," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 32-38.
    9. Baier, Scott L. & Yotov, Yoto V. & Zylkin, Thomas, 2019. "On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: Lessons from twenty years of trade integration," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 206-226.
    10. Luca Alfieri, 2021. "Heterogeneity of financial institutions in the process of economic and monetary integration in East Asia," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 1053-1076, April.
    11. Amara Zongo, 2021. "The impact of services trade restrictiveness on food trade," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 166, pages 71-94.
    12. Luca Alfieri, 2018. "Heterogeneity Of Financial Institutions In The Process Of Economic And Monetary Integration In East Asia," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 112, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    13. Anna Golovko & Hasan Sahin, 2021. "Analysis of international trade integration of Eurasian countries: gravity model approach," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 519-548, September.
    14. Tamar Taralashvili, 2024. "The impact of interstate soft conflicts on bilateral trade flows using structural gravity model," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 1943-1977, May.
    15. Dimitrios Dadakas & Stavroula Tatsi, 2021. "Global agricultural trade impact of the 2011 triple disaster in Japan: A gravity approach," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(4), pages 937-972, October.
    16. Anirudh Shingal, 2020. "Quantifying Barriers to Movement of Service Suppliers and Examining their Effects: Implications for COVID-19," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 399, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
    17. Xing Yao & Yongzhong Zhang & Rizwana Yasmeen & Zhen Cai, 2021. "The impact of preferential trade agreements on bilateral trade: A structural gravity model analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Anirudh Shingal & Malte Ehrich, 2019. "Trade effects of standards harmonization in the EU: improved access for non-EU partners," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 372, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
    19. Maria Cipollina & Luca De Benedictis & Luca Salvatici & Claudio Vicarelli, 2016. "Policy Measurement And Multilateral Resistance In Gravity Models," Working Papers LuissLab 16130, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza, LUISS Guido Carli.
    20. Yoto V. Yotov, 2024. "The evolution of structural gravity: The workhorse model of trade," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(4), pages 578-603, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2022:i:8:p:3-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.