IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arb/journl/y2022i2p70-87.html

Impact Of Experience With Changes On Adaptability And Organizational Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Irena Mladenova

    (Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski")

Abstract

This article explores the impact of Previous experience with change on two dependent variables. The first one is Adaptability, measured as one of the organizational ambidexterity elements. Organizational ambidexterity is defined as the dynamic capability of organizations to balance exploration (experimenting, creation of new knowledge, innovation) and exploitation (refining, use of existing knowledge) in order to be successful in changing environments. The second one is Organizational performance, measured as subjective assessment in comparison to competitors in four areas: financial results, customer satisfaction, process improvement and employee development. Data is obtained from a larger study on Organizational capacity for change, conducted amongst employees and managers in organizations operating in Bulgaria through a questionnaire. Two hierarchical regression analyses are applied and confirm direct and positive impact of the previous experience with change on both adaptability and organizational performance. The results are relevant for managers especially in the context of dynamic environment and high level of unpredictability. The positive impact of previous experience with change supports the development of dynamic capabilities which help building adaptability. It also helps organizations to sustain competitive advantage and better performance in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Irena Mladenova, 2022. "Impact Of Experience With Changes On Adaptability And Organizational Performance," HR and Technologies, Creative Space Association, issue 2, pages 70-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:arb:journl:y:2022:i:2:p:70-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.cspace-ngo.com/arb/Issues/2022/2/5-Mladenova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elisabeth Supriharyanti & Badri Munir Sukoco, 2022. "Organizational change capability: a systematic review and future research directions," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 46-81, March.
    2. O'Reilly, Charles A., III & Tushman, Michael L., 2013. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future," Research Papers 2130, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    3. Raineri, Andrés B., 2011. "Change management practices: Impact on perceived change results," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 266-272, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehmood, Khalid & Kautish, Pradeep & Mehrotra, Ankit & Alofaysan, Hind & Papa, Armando, 2025. "Forging sustainable synergies: Unleashing fintech-driven supply chain collaboration for enhanced green supply chain performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Jonas Hermann Schulze & Felix Pinkow, 2020. "Leadership for Organisational Adaptability: How Enabling Leaders Create Adaptive Space," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Irena Mladenova, 2022. "Previous Participation In Organizational Changes And Its Relationship With Adaptability," INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT", University of Economics - Varna, issue 1, pages 299-307.
    4. Sariol, Ana M. & Abebe, Michael A., 2017. "The influence of CEO power on explorative and exploitative organizational innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 38-45.
    5. Anna Froese, 2017. "Organizations in balance: revitalizing the concept of organizational equilibrium [Organisationen in Balance: Die Revitalisierung des Konzepts des Organisationalen Gleichgewichts]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 51-59, June.
    6. Shao, Yan & Nijstad, Bernard A. & Täuber, Susanne, 2019. "Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 7-19.
    7. Stephan Leitner & Friederike Wall, 2021. "Decision-facilitating information in hidden-action setups: an agent-based approach," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 16(2), pages 323-358, April.
    8. Bouzoukas, Kostakis, 2025. "Leading Judgment in the Age of AI: A Leadership-Centered Sociotechnical Canvas for Trust, Deference, and Override," SocArXiv x8jcu_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. Xin Li & Li Ma, 2020. "Chinese management research needs self-confidence but not over-confidence," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 481-498, June.
    10. William G. Egelhoff, 2020. "How a Flexible Matrix Structure Could Create Ambidexterity at the Macro Level of Large, Complex Organizations Like MNCs," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 459-484, June.
    11. Rick H L Aalbers & Killian McCarthy & Menno Huisman & Jonas Roettger, 2021. "Moving motives: How past and present strategy influence the market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Buccieri, Dominic & Javalgi, Raj G. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2020. "International new venture performance: Role of international entrepreneurial culture, ambidextrous innovation, and dynamic marketing capabilities," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    13. Robert Keller & Philipp Ollig & Patrick Rövekamp, 2022. "Pathways to Developing Digital Capabilities within Entrepreneurial Initiatives in Pre-Digital Organizations," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(1), pages 33-46, February.
    14. Úbeda-García, Mercedes & Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio & García-Lillo, Francisco, 2018. "High performance work system and performance: Opening the black box through the organizational ambidexterity and human resource flexibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 397-406.
    15. Ovuakporie, Oghogho Destina & Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Wang, Chengang & Wei, Yingqi, 2021. "Differential moderating effects of strategic and operational reconfiguration on the relationship between open innovation practices and innovation performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    16. Constantinos Choromides, 2021. "Leading change in Financial Service Organisations: An Exploration of Employees’ Perceptions of Management of Change Using an Organisational Justice Framework," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 71(3-4), pages 67-97, July-Dece.
    17. Evers, Natasha & Andersson, Svante, 2021. "Predictive and effectual decision-making in high-tech international new ventures – A matter of sequential ambidexterity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    18. Ashrafi, Amir & Zareravasan, Ahad, 2022. "An ambidextrous approach on the business analytics-competitive advantage relationship: Exploring the moderating role of business analytics strategy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    19. Huigang Liang & Nianxin Wang & Yajiong Xue, 2022. "Juggling Information Technology (IT) Exploration and Exploitation: A Proportional Balance View of IT Ambidexterity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1386-1402, December.
    20. Lysander Weiss & Dominik Kanbach, 2022. "Toward an integrated framework of corporate venturing for organizational ambidexterity as a dynamic capability," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 1129-1170, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arb:journl:y:2022:i:2:p:70-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pavlina Ivanova (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.