IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arb/journl/y2022i2p70-87.html

Impact Of Experience With Changes On Adaptability And Organizational Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Irena Mladenova

    (Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski")

Abstract

This article explores the impact of Previous experience with change on two dependent variables. The first one is Adaptability, measured as one of the organizational ambidexterity elements. Organizational ambidexterity is defined as the dynamic capability of organizations to balance exploration (experimenting, creation of new knowledge, innovation) and exploitation (refining, use of existing knowledge) in order to be successful in changing environments. The second one is Organizational performance, measured as subjective assessment in comparison to competitors in four areas: financial results, customer satisfaction, process improvement and employee development. Data is obtained from a larger study on Organizational capacity for change, conducted amongst employees and managers in organizations operating in Bulgaria through a questionnaire. Two hierarchical regression analyses are applied and confirm direct and positive impact of the previous experience with change on both adaptability and organizational performance. The results are relevant for managers especially in the context of dynamic environment and high level of unpredictability. The positive impact of previous experience with change supports the development of dynamic capabilities which help building adaptability. It also helps organizations to sustain competitive advantage and better performance in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Irena Mladenova, 2022. "Impact Of Experience With Changes On Adaptability And Organizational Performance," HR and Technologies, Creative Space Association, issue 2, pages 70-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:arb:journl:y:2022:i:2:p:70-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.cspace-ngo.com/arb/Issues/2022/2/5-Mladenova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raineri, Andrés B., 2011. "Change management practices: Impact on perceived change results," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 266-272, March.
    2. Elisabeth Supriharyanti & Badri Munir Sukoco, 2022. "Organizational change capability: a systematic review and future research directions," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 46-81, March.
    3. O'Reilly, Charles A., III & Tushman, Michael L., 2013. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future," Research Papers 2130, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashrafi, Amir & Zareravasan, Ahad, 2022. "An ambidextrous approach on the business analytics-competitive advantage relationship: Exploring the moderating role of business analytics strategy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Lin, Hsing-Er & Hsu, I-Chieh & Hsu, Audrey Wenhsin & Chung, Hsi-Mei, 2020. "Creating competitive advantages: Interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Heredia Pérez, Jorge A. & Geldes, Cristian & Kunc, Martin H. & Flores, Alejandro, 2019. "New approach to the innovation process in emerging economies: The manufacturing sector case in Chile and Peru," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 35-55.
    4. Juan Acevedo & Iván Díaz Molina, 2025. "Managers’ ambidexterity in startups’ CEOs: effect of transversal competencies in the balance of pursuing exploratory and exploitative innovation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Tomasz Helbin & Amy Van Looy, 2021. "Is Business Process Management (BPM) Ready for Ambidexterity? Conceptualization, Implementation Guidelines and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Xinwei Li & Wenjuan Zeng & Mao Xu, 2022. "The Moderating Role of IT Capability on Green Innovation and Ambidexterity: Towards a Corporate Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Zhou, Lianxi & Xu, Shou-Ren & Xu, Hui & Barnes, Bradley R., 2020. "Unleashing the dynamics of product-market ambidexterity in the pursuit of international opportunities: Insights from emerging market firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    8. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    9. Mohammad Taghi Taghavifard & Setareh Majidian, 2022. "Identifying Cloud Computing Risks based on Firm’s Ambidexterity Performance using Fuzzy VIKOR Technique," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(1), pages 113-133, March.
    10. Thillai Raja Pertheban & Ramayah Thurasamy & Anbalagan Marimuthu & Kumara Rajah Venkatachalam & Sanmugam Annamalah & Pradeep Paraman & Wong Chee Hoo, 2023. "The Impact of Proactive Resilience Strategies on Organizational Performance: Role of Ambidextrous and Dynamic Capabilities of SMEs in Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    11. Iftikhar, Anas & Ali, Imran & Zhan, Yuanzhu & Stevenson, Mark & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2025. "Firms’ strategic responses to rising uncertainty amid ongoing geopolitical tensions: The synergistic mediating role of network capability and innovation ambidexterity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. Vito Manfredi Latilla & Fedrico Frattini & Simone Franzo & Vittorio Chiesa, 2019. "Organisational Change And Business Model Innovation: An Exploratory Study Of An Energy Utility," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-33, June.
    13. Canale, Fernanda & Müller, Claudio & Laveren, Eddy & Cambré, Bart, 2024. "The role of the family and the institutional context for ambidexterity in Latin American family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    14. Marianne Kuhlmann & Catharina R. Bening & Volker H. Hoffmann, 2023. "How incumbents realize disruptive circular innovation ‐ Overcoming the innovator's dilemma for a circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1106-1121, March.
    15. Dai, Ye & Du, Kui & Byun, Gukdo & Zhu, Xi, 2017. "Ambidexterity in new ventures: The impact of new product development alliances and transactive memory systems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 77-85.
    16. Tamara Rodríguez-González & Mercedes Villanueva-Flores & Mariluz Fernández-Alles & Mirta Díaz-Fernández, 2021. "Are Spanish TTOs Prepared to Innovation in a COVID Context?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Campbell, Robert J. & Short, Cole E. & Graffin, Scott D., 2025. "Balancing the radical and the incremental: CEO affiliative humor and organizational ambidexterity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    18. Shah, Naimatullah & Irani, Zahir & Sharif, Amir M., 2017. "Big data in an HR context: Exploring organizational change readiness, employee attitudes and behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 366-378.
    19. Zhiwei Wang & Hui Sun & Chenxin Ding & Long Xin & Xuechao Xia & Yuanyuan Gong, 2023. "Do Technology Alliance Network Characteristics Promote Ambidextrous Green Innovation? A Perspective from Internal and External Pressures of Firms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Heckmann, Nadine & Steger, Thomas & Dowling, Michael, 2016. "Organizational capacity for change, change experience, and change project performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 777-784.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arb:journl:y:2022:i:2:p:70-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pavlina Ivanova (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.