IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alu/journl/v2y2024i26p4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Governance And Performance Of Romanian State-Owned Enterprises: Assessing Transparency And Accountability Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana Andreea CIOLOMIC

    (“1st December 1918†University)

Abstract

This article examines the impact of transparency, a key aspect of good governance, on the performance and audit opinions of Romanian state-owned enterprises (SOEs). A transparency and corporate governance disclosure index (DI) was developed and analyzed by applying an econometric model. The results show that compliance with corporate governance laws has not improved SOE financial performance but reveals a significant correlation between transparency levels and audit opinions. The mixed objectives of state-owned enterprises and the (inappropriate) performance measurement tools for these types of companies are key factors influencing the results obtained. This research provides insights for public managers and board members to enhance SOE efficiency and compliance with corporate governance regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana Andreea CIOLOMIC, 2024. "Corporate Governance And Performance Of Romanian State-Owned Enterprises: Assessing Transparency And Accountability Levels," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(26), pages 1-4.
    • Handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:2:y:2024:i:26:p:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/2620242/04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han Yu & Abraham Y. Nahm & Zengji Song, 2022. "The power source of Chinese state-owned enterprise leaders, investigation of local core officials, and corporate investment behavior," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 223-247, April.
    2. repec:cdl:glinre:qt8c25c3z4 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alan K. Styles & Mack Tennyson, 2007. "The accessibility of financial reporting of u.s. municipalities on the internet," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 56-92, March.
    4. Lin, Justin Yifu & Li, Zhiyun, 2008. "Policy burden, privatization and soft budget constraint," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 90-102, March.
    5. Jonathan Fox, 2007. "The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4-5), pages 663-671.
    6. Marinko Škare & Tea Hasić, 2016. "Corporate governance, firm performance, and economic growth -- theoretical analysis," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 35-51, February.
    7. Mohd Hassan Che Haat & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Sakthi Mahenthiran, 2008. "Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(8), pages 744-778, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dhouha Bouaziz, 2025. "Does External Audit Quality Moderate the Relationship Between CEO Entrenchment and Financial Communication Quality? Evidence from French Companies," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 15(3), pages 101-129.
    2. Yousef Hassan, 2025. "Board gender diversity and ownership structure: Are they substitutes or complementary? Evidence from Palestine," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 109-124, March.
    3. World Bank, 2025. "The Markets and Competition Policy Assessment Toolkit," World Bank Publications - Reports 42649, The World Bank Group.
    4. Francesco Macheda, 2020. "Il ruolo delle imprese a conduzione statale nella lotta della Cina contro il COVID-19 (The role of State-Owned Enterprises in China's fight against the coronavirus disease)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 73(290), pages 111-139.
    5. Deng, Yongheng & Morck, Randall & Wu, Jing & Yeung, Bernard, 2011. "Monetary and Fiscal Stimuli, Ownership Structure, and China's Housing Market," Ratio Working Papers 173, The Ratio Institute.
    6. Xunan Feng & Anders C. Johansson, 2017. "CEO Incentives in Chinese State-Controlled Firms," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(2), pages 223-264.
    7. Ahmad, Nglaa & Haque, Shamima & Islam, Muhammad Azizul, 2024. "Modern slavery disclosure regulations in the global supply Chain: A world-systems perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Vitiana L'Abate & Filippo Vitolla & Paolo Esposito & Nicola Raimo, 2023. "The drivers of sustainability disclosure practices in the airport industry: A legitimacy theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1903-1916, July.
    9. Haitian Lu & Hongbo Pan & Chenying Zhang, 2015. "Political Connectedness and Court Outcomes: Evidence from Chinese Corporate Lawsuits," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(4).
    10. Russell Cooper & Guan Gong & Ping Yan, 2015. "Dynamic labor demand in China: public and private objectives," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 46(3), pages 577-610, September.
    11. Shibata, Takashi & Nishihara, Michi, 2011. "Interactions between investment timing and management effort under asymmetric information: Costs and benefits of privatized firms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 688-696, December.
    12. Nadia Atiqah Zulkiffly & Sharifah Nazatul Faiza Syed Mustapha Nazri & Salwa Zolkaflil, 2025. "The Quantitative Approach of Corporate Ethical Culture in Reducing Corporate Fraud," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(9), pages 2636-2653, August.
    13. Jen-Yao Lee & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2018. "Foreign competition and optimal privatization with excess burden of taxation," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 189-204, October.
    14. Yu, Zhen & Shen, Yiran & Jiang, Shengjun, 2022. "The effects of corporate governance uncertainty on state-owned enterprises' green innovation in China: Perspective from the participation of non-state-owned shareholders," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Issam Abdo Ahmad & Ali Fakih, 2022. "Does the legal form matter for firm performance in the MENA region?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 205-227, March.
    16. Hoeft, Leonard & Mill, Wladislaw, 2024. "Abuse of power," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 305-324.
    17. Michael Amoh Asiedu & Emmanuel Mensah, 2023. "Re-examining the corporate governance – Firm performance nexus: Fresh evidence from a causal mediation analysis," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2223414-222, December.
    18. Joel Wood, 2013. "The Effects of Bailouts and Soft Budget Constraints on the Environment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(1), pages 127-137, January.
    19. Liu, Sun, 2015. "Corporate governance and forward-looking disclosure: Evidence from China," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 16-30.
    20. Teklay, Belaynesh & Yu, Wei & Zhu, Keying, 2024. "The effect of superstitious beliefs on corporate investment efficiency: evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1434-1447.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:2:y:2024:i:26:p:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan-Constantin Danuletiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.