IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/saebjn/v66y2019i2p25-35n143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Piracy Revisited: Exploring Music Users in the Age of Technology Dependency

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Cuadrado-García
  • María José Miquel-Romero
  • Juan D. Montoro-Pons

Abstract

This paper empirically investigates and characterizes users of recorded music, both downloaders and purchasers. To this end we analyse the role of the variables defining the different segments of music users. In doing so, we have considered two main traits influencing the use of music. First, objective variables such as demographics, music consumption habits, music genres and technology. Second, subjective variables such as motives and attitudes towards piracy. Using data from a personal survey, subsequent latent class and fuzzy analyses show that while the former characteristics are relevant in those getting music for free from the Internet, the latter don´t pay any special part, contrary to what literature had suggested. Specifically, we find evidence of age, gender, technology, and genre of music confirming previous studies carried out on this topic before the existing gap in the literature. However, there is no evidence of these variables defining patterns of purchase behaviour. JEL Codes - M300; M310

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Cuadrado-García & María José Miquel-Romero & Juan D. Montoro-Pons, 2019. "Piracy Revisited: Exploring Music Users in the Age of Technology Dependency," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 66(2), pages 25-35, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:66:y:2019:i:2:p:25-35:n:143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://saeb.feaa.uaic.ro/index.php/saeb/article/view/1126
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sinclair, Gary & Tinson, Julie, 2017. "Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Ragin, Charles C., 2000. "Fuzzy-Set Social Science," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226702773, March.
    3. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226702766 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ragin, Charles C., 2006. "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 291-310, July.
    5. Robin, Donald P. & Reidenbach, R. Eric & Forrest, P. J., 1996. "The perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 17-28, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markus Mayer & Markus Voeth, 2022. "Improving negotiation success in B2B sales organizations: is structured negotiation management a success factor?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 163-196, February.
    2. Miquel-Romero, Maria-Jose & Frasquet, Marta & Molla-Descals, Alejandro, 2020. "The role of the store in managing postpurchase complaints for omnichannel shoppers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 288-296.
    3. Galati, Antonino & Coticchio, Alessandro & Peiró-Signes, Ángel, 2023. "Identifying the factors affecting citizens' willingness to participate in urban forest governance: Evidence from the municipality of Palermo, Italy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Maria do Rosario Correia & Raquel F. Ch. Meneses, 2019. "Venture Capital and the Use of Convertible Securities and Control Rights Covenants: A Fuzzy Set Approach," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 5-20.
    5. Brenes, Esteban R. & Ciravegna, Luciano & Pichardo, Caleb A., 2016. "Examining the strategy-performance link of Latin American businesses – a configurational approach," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(3), December.
    6. Roberto Chierici & Barbara Del Bosco & Alice Mazzucchelli & Claudio Chiacchierini, 2021. "Enhancing Brand Awareness, Reputation and Loyalty: The Role of Social Media," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 216-216, July.
    7. Alrik Thiem, 2014. "Unifying Configurational Comparative Methods," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 43(2), pages 313-337, May.
    8. Helena Susana Amaral Geraldes & Ana Paula Matias Gama & Mário Augusto, 2022. "Reaching Financial Inclusion: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 599-617, July.
    9. Zheng, Lu & Ulrich, Klaus & Sendra-García, Javier, 2021. "Qualitative comparative analysis: Configurational paths to innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 83-93.
    10. Grohs, Reinhard & Raies, Karine & Koll, Oliver & Mühlbacher, Hans, 2016. "One pie, many recipes: Alternative paths to high brand strength," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2244-2251.
    11. Wagemann, Claudius & Buche, Jonas & Siewert, Markus B., 2016. "QCA and business research: Work in progress or a consolidated agenda?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2531-2540.
    12. Boratyńska, Katarzyna & Grzegorzewska, Emilia, 2018. "Bankruptcy prediction in the agribusiness sector: Lessons from quantitative and qualitative approaches," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 175-181.
    13. Paulo Ferreira & Andreia Dionísio, 2016. "Entrepreneurship rates: the fuzzy-set approach," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 2(2), pages 111-128.
    14. Barry Cooper & Judith Glaesser, 2016. "Analysing necessity and sufficiency with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: how do results vary as case weights change?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 327-346, January.
    15. Anna Kwiotkowska, 2018. "Barriers to the development of spin-offs. A fuzzy-set-theoretic approach," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 28(4), pages 31-46.
    16. Henik, Erika, 2015. "Understanding whistle-blowing: a set-theoretic approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 442-450.
    17. Wang, Huanming & Ran, Bing, 2022. "How business-related governance strategies impact paths towards the formation of global cities? An institutional embeddedness perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    18. Tóth, Zsófia & Thiesbrummel, Christoph & Henneberg, Stephan C. & Naudé, Peter, 2015. "Understanding configurations of relational attractiveness of the customer firm using fuzzy set QCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 723-734.
    19. Nadine Ansorg, 2014. "Wars without borders: Conditions for the development of regional conflict systems in sub-Saharan Africa," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 295-312, September.
    20. Keming Yang, 2018. "Causal conditions for loneliness: a set-theoretic analysis on an adult sample in the UK," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 685-701, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:66:y:2019:i:2:p:25-35:n:143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.