IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/veagro/316845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RICA: creación de una plataforma digital de intercambio de conocimiento

Author

Listed:
  • Albisu, Luis Miguel

Abstract

Knowledge fosters innovation, but it is important to recognize that the system is not linear, in the classic R & D & I initials, starting from research and continuing with development to reach innovation. Knowledge comes from different sources and one of them is the empirical knowledge of people who are close to the reality of everyday problems and the implementation of technological developments. Therefore, the transmission of knowledge is not unidirectional but bidirectional, from the experts (researchers and technicians) and from the agri-food farmers and entrepreneurs. Both groups need to exchange their knowledge, which often have different perspectives. This approach is treated in a new technological platform that uses digital media for communication and is called RICA (Network for the Exchange of Agri-Food Knowledge, at http://ricagroalimentacion.es). In this work its generation, the sections that compose it, the difficulties of its management, the results and some reflections for the future are explained. After 4 years of RICA development it is enough time to evaluate all these aspects. This paper also explains the importance of incorporating in RICA sections related to information and others related to knowledge. The former promotes greater visibility, which generates greater contact with the sections related to knowledge. Experience indicates that experts have been able to respond to expectations of disclosure, to a much greater extent than farmers and agri-food entrepreneurs to express their problems and knowledge. The former reacts positively to disclose their knowledge, when they find that what is published on the platform has high visibility. However, the latter are more reluctant to use the digital platform, accustomed to more personal contact by establishing stable and credible relationships. The difficulty that experts have in reaching their knowledge to end users should be solved by technicians who are particularly sensitive to innovation. The use of the Internet for the acquisition of knowledge is still restricted by certain groups and, with greater use, will take a long time to complete and will be led by the younger generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Albisu, Luis Miguel, 2020. "RICA: creación de una plataforma digital de intercambio de conocimiento," Agroalimentaria Journal - Revista Agroalimentaria, Centro de Investigaciones Agroalimentarias, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Universidad de los Andes, vol. 26(51).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:veagro:316845
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.316845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/316845/files/Articulo_13_Albisu_R51.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.316845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2008. "Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 260-276, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Yang Zhang & Dezhong Duan & Debin Du, 2020. "Coordinated Development of Innovation System in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt, a Demand and Supply Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Sergio Ochoa Jiménez & Gimena Vianey Cervantes Hurtado & Carlos Armando Jacobo Hernández & José Guadalupe Flores López, 2020. "Knowledge and Innovation in Mexican Agricultural Organizations," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Ciarli, Tommaso & Ràfols, Ismael, 2019. "The relation between research priorities and societal demands: The case of rice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 949-967.
    5. Ho, Jae-Yun & Yoon, Semee, 2022. "Ambiguous roles of intermediaries in social entrepreneurship: The case of social innovation system in South Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Čikić, Jovana & Petrović, Živojin, 2013. "Diffusion Of Knowledge And Innovations In Serbian Agriculture," Agri-Food Sector in Serbia: State and Challenges, Serbian Association of Agricultural Economists, number 157553 edited by Škorić, Dragan & Tomić, Danilo & Popović, Vesna, December.
    7. Jude William R. Genilo, 2010. "Communication and the Construction of Local Knowledge in Thai Rice Farming Villages," Millennial Asia, , vol. 1(2), pages 197-214, July.
    8. Eligio Malusà & Ewa M. Furmanczyk & Małgorzata Tartanus & Gerjan Brouwer & Claude-Eric Parveaud & François Warlop & Markus Kelderer & Jutta Kienzle & Evelyne Alcazar Marin & Teun Dekker & Radek Vávra , 2022. "Knowledge Networks in Organic Fruit Production across Europe: A Survey Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Garbade, Philipp J.P. & Fortuin, Frances T.J.M. & Omta, S.W.F. (Onno), 2013. "Coordinating Clusters: A Cross Sectoral Study of Cluster Organization Functions in The Netherlands," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 3(3), pages 1-15, February.
    10. De Silva, Muthu & Howells, Jeremy & Meyer, Martin, 2018. "Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 70-87.
    11. Schröter, Barbara & Matzdorf, Bettina & Sattler, Claudia & Garcia Alarcon, Gisele, 2015. "Intermediaries to foster the implementation of innovative land management practice for ecosystem service provision – A new role for researchers," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 192-200.
    12. Véronique Schaeffer & Mireille Matt, 2016. "Development of academic entrepreneurship in a non-mature context: the role of the university as a hub-organisation," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(9-10), pages 724-745, October.
    13. Matt, M. & Gaunand, A. & Joly, P-B. & Colinet, L., 2017. "Opening the black box of impact – Ideal-type impact pathways in a public agricultural research organization," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 207-218.
    14. Lydia Chikumbi & Milan Scasny, "undated". "Does ‘price framing’ influence empirical estimates in Discrete Choice Experiments: The case study for the South African wine industry," Working Papers 878, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    15. Maziya, Sikhanyiso Angel, 2019. "The impact of the Europeun Union grant on access to credit and production in smallholder sugarcane agriculture in Siphofaneni, Eswatini," Research Theses 334775, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    16. Aurélie Cardona & Cristiana Carusi & Michael Mayerfeld Bell, 2021. "Engaged Intermediaries to Bridge the Gap between Scientists, Educational Practitioners and Farmers to Develop Sustainable Agri-Food Innovation Systems: A US Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Maryline FILIPPI & Olivier FREY, 2015. "Le conseiller, une pièce maîtresse sur l’échiquier de la coopérative agricole," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(3), pages 439-466.
    18. Andrea Arzeni & Francesca Giarè & Mara Lai & Maria Valentina Lasorella & Rossella Ugati & Anna Vagnozzi, 2023. "Interactive Approach for Innovation: The Experience of the Italian EIP AGRI Operational Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    19. Nilsson, Magnus & Sia-Ljungström, Clarissa, 2013. "The Role of Innovation Intermediaries in Innovation Systems," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164741, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    20. Mónica Ramos-Mejía & Alejandro Balanzo, 2018. "What It Takes to Lead Sustainability Transitions from the Bottom-Up: Strategic Interactions of Grassroots Ecopreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:veagro:316845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciulave.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.