IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/polpwa/280730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Regulations and the Perspectives of Renewable Energy Policy in Selected EU Member States

Author

Listed:
  • Marišová, Eleonóra
  • Mariš, Martin
  • Gaduš, Ján
  • Parlińska, Agnieszka

Abstract

The main objective of the paper is an evaluation of the development of the use of the RES in V4 countries compared to the EU-28 average and assessment, if national strategic goals regarding the share of the RES on gross inland energy consumption are achievable till 2020. To achieve the main aim of the paper it was decided to apply Brown triple exponential smoothing model as a main research method. Based on gathered results and using the extrapolation for making the forecast till do 2020 it was found out, that Slovakia might track the national target with point estimation of 16.25% (90% CI: 13.98:18.53), Czech Republic 12.75% (90% CI: 10.44:15.06), Poland 19.9% (90% CI: 16.42: 23.37). In case of Hungary, it might fail to reach the national target with point estimation of 10.42% (90% CI:8.87:11.98) and overall EU in average will not be able to reach common target with point estimation of 15.94% (90% CI:13.08:18.8).

Suggested Citation

  • Marišová, Eleonóra & Mariš, Martin & Gaduš, Ján & Parlińska, Agnieszka, . "Legal Regulations and the Perspectives of Renewable Energy Policy in Selected EU Member States," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 18(33, Part ).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:polpwa:280730
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.280730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/280730/files/216_MARISHOVA_I_INNI_art._278A.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.280730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klessmann, Corinna & Held, Anne & Rathmann, Max & Ragwitz, Mario, 2011. "Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union—What is needed to reach the 2020 targets?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7637-7657.
    2. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Butkus, Mindaugas, 2017. "The European Union possibilities to achieve targets of Europe 2020 and Paris agreement climate policy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 298-309.
    3. Strunz, Sebastian & Gawel, Erik & Lehmann, Paul, 2016. "The political economy of renewable energy policies in Germany and the EU," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 33-41.
    4. deLlano-Paz, Fernando & Martínez Fernandez, Paulino & Soares, Isabel, 2016. "Addressing 2030 EU policy framework for energy and climate: Cost, risk and energy security issues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P2), pages 1347-1360.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Małgorzata K. Guzowska & Barbara Kryk & Dorota Michalak & Paulina Szyja, 2021. "R&D Spending in the Energy Sector and Achieving the Goal of Climate Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Barbara Kryk & Małgorzata Klaudia Guzowska, 2021. "Implementation of Climate/Energy Targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy by the EU Member States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Joaquín Fuentes-del-Burgo & Elena Navarro-Astor & Nuno M. M. Ramos & João Poças Martins, 2021. "Exploring the Critical Barriers to the Implementation of Renewable Technologies in Existing University Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Daphne Ngar-yin Mah & Darren Man-wai Cheung, 2020. "Conceptualizing Niche–Regime Dynamics of Energy Transitions from a Political Economic Perspective: Insights from Community-Led Urban Solar in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Umut Uzar, 2021. "The relationship between institutional quality and ecological footprint: Is there a connection?," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(4), pages 380-396, November.
    6. Paulino Martinez-Fernandez & Fernando deLlano-Paz & Anxo Calvo-Silvosa & Isabel Soares, 2019. "Assessing Renewable Energy Sources for Electricity (RES-E) Potential Using a CAPM-Analogous Multi-Stage Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Juárez-Luna, David & Urdiales, Eduardo, 2021. "Participación de la capacidad fotovoltaica instalada en México: un análisis benchmarking [Share of installed photovoltaic capacity in Mexico: a benchmarking analysis]," MPRA Paper 114589, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Chun-Kai Wang & Chien-Ming Lee & Yue-Rong Hong & Kan Cheng, 2021. "Assessment of Energy Transition Policy in Taiwan—A View of Sustainable Development Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Sikkema, Richard & Proskurina, Svetlana & Banja, Manjola & Vakkilainen, Esa, 2021. "How can solid biomass contribute to the EU’s renewable energy targets in 2020, 2030 and what are the GHG drivers and safeguards in energy- and forestry sectors?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 758-772.
    10. Berk, Istemi & Kasman, Adnan & Kılınç, Dilara, 2020. "Towards a common renewable future: The System-GMM approach to assess the convergence in renewable energy consumption of EU countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Mezősi, András & Beöthy, Ákos & Kácsor, Enikő & Törőcsik, Ágnes, 2016. "A magyarországi távhő-szabályozás modellezése. A megújuló energiára alapozott hőtermelés [Modelling policy options in the district heating sector, with a focus on renewable consumption]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1149-1176.
    12. Stevovic, Ivan & Mirjanic, Dragoljub & Petrovic, Natasa, 2021. "Integration of solar energy by nature-inspired optimization in the context of circular economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    13. Robert Wade & Geraint Ellis, 2022. "Reclaiming the Windy Commons: Landownership, Wind Rights, and the Assetization of Renewable Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-31, May.
    14. Wang, Binbin & Wang, Hechun & Hu, Deng & Yang, Chuanlei & Duan, Baoyin & Wang, Yinyan, 2023. "Study on the performance of premixed natural gas/ammonia engine with diesel ignition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    15. Correia-da-Silva, João & Soares, Isabel & Fernández, Raquel, 2020. "Impact of dynamic pricing on investment in renewables," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Zbigniew Juroszek & Weronika Juroszek, 2018. "Attitudes of heat plant managers as one of the key obstacles to district heating decarbonization in Poland," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(7), pages 1116-1129, November.
    17. Mac Domhnaill, Ciarán & Ryan, Lisa, 2020. "Towards renewable electricity in Europe: Revisiting the determinants of renewable electricity in the European Union," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 955-965.
    18. Farrell, Niall, 2023. "Policy design for green hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    19. Herbes, Carsten & Rilling, Benedikt & MacDonald, Scott & Boutin, Nathalie & Bigerna, Simona, 2020. "Are voluntary markets effective in replacing state-led support for the expansion of renewables? – A comparative analysis of voluntary green electricity markets in the UK, Germany, France and Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Mario Ragwitz & Simone Steinhilber, 2014. "Effectiveness and efficiency of support schemes for electricity from renewable energy sources," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(2), pages 213-229, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polpwa:280730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wesggpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.