IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/polgne/358795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oddziaływanie efektu grawitacyjnego na zróżnicowanie wydajności pracy w krajach bałkańskich

Author

Listed:
  • Mroczek, Katarzyna
  • Nowosad, Andrzej
  • Tokarski, Tomasz

Abstract

The authors explore what they define as gravity effect and its impact on regional disparities in labor productivity in 11 Balkan countries from 2000 to 2013. The gravity effect, which is a reference to Newton’s gravity law, is based on the assumption that regions have some economic influence on one another. The strength of these relationships is proportional to the size of the regional economies and inversely proportional to the distance between them. The model of economic growth applied by Mroczek, Nowosad and Tokarski draws from the neoclassical models of Solow; Mankiw, Romer and Weil; and Nonneman and Vanhoud. The research looks at how Balkan countries are distinct from other European economies in terms of the capital-labor ratio and regional disparities in labor productivity. The authors discuss the specific features of the Balkan political system and examine why the region has followed a different path of political and economic development than the rest of postwar Europe. The Balkan region is distinct for its authoritarian regimes, military conflicts and public acceptance of corruption, the authors say. They compare the political and economic systems of individual Balkan countries and their development paths from the end of World War II to the end of 2013. In their research, the authors use a method based on numerical simulations of a long-term equilibrium in labor productivity in Balkan economies. The model developed by the authors has an “asymptomatically stable steady state point regarded as a point of long-term equilibrium.” The research includes an analysis of statistical data on physical capital resources. The research shows that Greece, Slovenia, Croatia and Albania have high capital-labor ratios, while Romania, Serbia, Bulgaria, and Macedonia have low ratios. The impact of the capital-labor ratio on labor productivity in the region is almost three times stronger than the influence of the gravity effect, the authors say. They add that Albania and Croatia have the highest levels of labor productivity, while Romania and Turkey are at the opposite end of the spectrum. Macedonia and Bosnia-and-Hercegovina are the worst off in terms of the labor market situation and unemployment. Joblessness is the lowest in Romania, Turkey and Slovenia, according to the authors. Their research shows that Slovenia is the most affluent country in the Balkan region and the only one with a GDP per capita above the EU average. Several Balkan countries are associated with the European Union and seeking to join the bloc. According to Mroczek, Nowosad and Tokarski, EU accession would benefit these Balkan economies because it would reinforce the gravity effect and lead to a stronger convergence process, thus contributing to greater political and economic stability in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Mroczek, Katarzyna & Nowosad, Andrzej & Tokarski, Tomasz, 2015. "Oddziaływanie efektu grawitacyjnego na zróżnicowanie wydajności pracy w krajach bałkańskich," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2015(2), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:polgne:358795
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.358795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/358795/files/Tokarski.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.358795?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Gregory Mankiw & David Romer & David N. Weil, 1992. "A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 107(2), pages 407-437.
    2. Katarzyna Mroczek & Tomasz Tokarski & Mariusz Trojak, 2014. "Grawitacyjny model zróżnicowania rozwoju ekonomicznego województw," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 5-34.
    3. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    4. Walter Nonneman & Patrick Vanhoudt, 1996. "A Further Augmentation of the Solow Model and the Empirics of Economic Growth for OECD Countries," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 111(3), pages 943-953.
    5. Mroczek, Katarzyna & Tokarski, Tomasz & Trojak, Mariusz, 2014. "Grawitacyjny model zróżnicowania rozwoju ekonomicznego województw," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2014(3), June.
    6. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Filipowicz & Tomasz Tokarski & Mariusz Trojak, 2015. "Złote reguły akumulacji kapitału w grawitacyjnym modelu wzrostu gospodarczego," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 27-47.
    2. Sławomir Pastuszka & Jurand Skrzypek, 2017. "Konwergencja czy dywergencja regionów włoskich?," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 101-130.
    3. Katarzyna Mroczek & Andrzej Nowosad & Tomasz Tokarski, 2015. "Oddziaływanie efektu grawitacyjnego na zróżnicowanie wydajności pracy w krajach bałkańskich," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 15-53.
    4. Dalgaard, Carl-Johan & Strulik, Holger, 2013. "The history augmented Solow model," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 134-149.
    5. ?gel de la Fuente, "undated". "Convergence Across Countries And Regions: Theory And Empirics," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 447.00, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    6. Pop Silaghi, Monica Ioana & Alexa, Diana & Jude, Cristina & Litan, Cristian, 2014. "Do business and public sector research and development expenditures contribute to economic growth in Central and Eastern European Countries? A dynamic panel estimation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 108-119.
    7. Mariusz Próchniak & Bartosz Witkowski, 2006. "Modelowanie realnej konwergencji w skali międzynarodowej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 10, pages 1-31.
    8. Simon, György, 2001. "Növekedési mechanizmus - növekedési modell [Growth mechanism - growth model]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 185-202.
    9. Tokarski, Tomasz, 2007. "Optymalne stopy inwestycji w N-kapitałowym modelu wzrostu gospodarczego," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2007(9), September.
    10. Joaquin Maudos & Jose Manuel Pastor & Lorenzo Serrano, 2003. "Human capital in OECD countries: Technical change, efficiency and productivity," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 419-435.
    11. Bayraktar-Sağlam, Bahar & Yetkiner, Hakan, 2014. "A Romerian contribution to the empirics of economic growth," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 257-272.
    12. Themba G Chirwa & NM Odhiambo, 2019. "An Empirical Test Of Exogenous Growth Models: Evidence From Three Southern African Countries," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 64(220), pages 7-38, January –.
    13. Knaap, T., 1998. "A survey of complementaries in growth and location theories," Research Report 98C44, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    14. Justyna Supińska, 2013. "Does human factor matter for economic growth? Determinants of economic growth process in CEE countries in light of spatial theory," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 44(5), pages 505-532.
    15. Simon, György, 1999. "Technikai haladás, érték és profit [Technical progress, value and profit]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 428-445.
    16. Mariusz Próchniak & Bartosz Witkowski, 2006. "Modelowanie realnej konwergencji w skali międzynarodowej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 10, pages 1-31.
    17. Simon, György, 1998. "Növekedési tényezők, ár-, bér- és profitmechanizmus a modern gazdaságban [Factors of growth, price, wage and profit mechanism in the modern economy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 174-192.
    18. Bjarne S. Jensen & Ulla Lehmijoki, 2011. "Homothetic Multisector Growth Models," DEGIT Conference Papers c016_001, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    19. Mariya Neycheva, 2010. "Does public expenditure on education matter for growth in Europe? A comparison between old EU member states and post-communist economies," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 141-164.
    20. repec:dgr:rugsom:98c44 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Mroczek, Katarzyna & Tokarski, Tomasz & Trojak, Mariusz, 2014. "Grawitacyjny model zróżnicowania rozwoju ekonomicznego województw," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2014(3), June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polgne:358795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irsghpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.