IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/324082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Types And Structure Of Budget Support Instruments For Agricultural Producers In The Scope Of Cap

Author

Listed:
  • RUNOWSKI, HENRYK

Abstract

The aim of the article is to identify the types and structures of applied instruments of financial support for agricultural producers from the budget support in the scope of CAP, justify the aims of financially supporting agricultural producers as well as analyse the structure of this support by incorporating various CAP instruments in the years 2014-2020. Analyses were conducted on the basis of data from the European Court of Auditors for particular EU countries. On the basis of averaged data for this period, it was established that the basic instrument of budget support for agricultural producers are direct payments (BPS or SAPS depending on the EU country). The second most significant instrument is payments for “greening”. Other support instruments are of lesser significance, though continue to play an important social and economic role. In the scope of CAP, there are discrepancies between both the significance and structure of particular budget support instruments for agricultural producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Runowski, Henryk, 2021. "Types And Structure Of Budget Support Instruments For Agricultural Producers In The Scope Of Cap," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2021(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:324082
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.324082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/324082/files/1597244.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.324082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Euan Phimister & Deborah Roberts & Alana Gilbert, 2004. "The Dynamics of Farm Incomes: Panel data analysis using the Farm Accounts Survey," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 197-220, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Fałkowski & Maciej Jakubowski & Paweł Strawiński, 2014. "Returns from income strategies in rural Poland," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 22(1), pages 139-178, January.
    2. Paul Smyth & Anne Marie Butler & Thia Hennessy, 2008. "Explaining the variability in the Economic Performance of Irish Dairy Farmers 1998-2006," Working Papers 0817, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    3. Geoffroy Enjolras & Magali Aubert, 2018. "Does crop insurance lead to better environmental practices? Evidence from French farms," Post-Print hal-02048349, HAL.
    4. O'Neill,Stephen & Loughrey, Jason & Hynes, Stephen & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Hanrahan, Kevin, 2017. "The Redistributive Impact of EU Farm Payment Reforms in the UK and Ireland," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261107, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Enjolras, Geoffroy & Capitanio, Fabian & Aubert, Magali & Adinolfi, Felice, 2012. "Direct payments, crop insurance and the volatility of farm income. Some evidence in France and in Italy," 123rd Seminar, February 23-24, 2012, Dublin, Ireland 122478, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Berkeley Hill, 2008. "Some Economics of Public Statistics," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 387-420, September.
    7. Geoffroy Enjolras & Magali Aubert, 2020. "How does crop insurance influence pesticide use? Evidence from French farms," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 461-485, December.
    8. Gamel Abdul-Nasser Salifu, 2019. "The Political Economy Dynamics of Rural Household Income Diversification: A Review of the International Literature," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 273-290, December.
    9. Paul Allanson & Kalina Kasprzyk & Andrew P. Barnes, 2017. "Income Mobility and Income Inequality in Scottish Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 471-493, June.
    10. Maria Marino & Benedetto Rocchi & Simone Severini, 2021. "Conditional Income Disparity between Farm and Non‐farm Households in the European Union: A Longitudinal Analysis," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 589-606, June.
    11. Runowski, Henryk, 2020. "Dilemmas Of Measuring And Evaluating Income In Agriculture In The European Union," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(1).
    12. Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Marta Guth & Sebastian Stępień & Agnieszka Brelik, 2019. "The Influence of the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy on the Socio-Economic Sustainability of Farms (the Case of Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:324082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.