IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/360432.html

Planning toward sustainable food systems: An exploratory assessment of local U.S. food system plans

Author

Listed:
  • Karetny, Jane
  • Hoy, Casey
  • Usher, Kareem
  • Clark, Jill
  • Conroy, Maria

Abstract

National planning and health organizations agree that to achieve healthy and sustainable food systems, planners must balance goals across a spectrum of sustainability issues that include economic vitality, public health, ecological sustainability, social equity, and cultural diversity. This research is an assessment of government-adopted food system plans in the U.S. that examines which topics, across the three dimensions of sustainability (social, environmental, and economic), are included in local food system plans and conducts an exploratory analysis that asks whether the community capitals (built, cultural, social, financial, human, and natural) available in a community are associated with the content of food system plans. The research team first developed a Sustainable Food System Policy Index made up of 26 policy areas across the three dimensions that, in aggregate, define and operationalize sustainable food systems. With this index we evaluated a sample of 28 food system plans for inclusion of these policy impact areas. We then performed an exploratory regression analysis to examine whether the availability of community capitals was associated with the content of food system plans. Findings indicated that jurisdictions integrated a broad range of issues into their food system plans; however, there are certain issues across every dimension of sustainability that are much less frequently included in plans, such as strategies related to participation in decision-making, financial infrastructure, and the stewardship of natural resources. Regression analysis identified statistically significant linear relationships between particular capitals and the proportion of policy areas included in plans. In particular, higher metrics associated with poverty were associated with the inclusion of fewer policy areas and with a potentially narrower policy agenda. This study adds to the plan evaluation literature as one of the first attempts to document the content of a sample of U.S. food system plans through a sustainability lens, contributing to the knowledge of what types of issues are advanced by local food system plans and the policy implications of current gaps in planning agendas.

Suggested Citation

  • Karetny, Jane & Hoy, Casey & Usher, Kareem & Clark, Jill & Conroy, Maria, 2022. "Planning toward sustainable food systems: An exploratory assessment of local U.S. food system plans," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 11(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:360432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/360432/files/1072.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kameshwari Pothukuchi & Jerome Kaufman, 1999. "Placing the food system on the urban agenda: The role of municipal institutions in food systems planning," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 16(2), pages 213-224, June.
    2. J. Allister McGregor & Nicky Pouw, 2017. "Towards an economics of well-being," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(4), pages 1123-1142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Tianzhu, 2025. "What scale for local food system planning? Insights from French case studies," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 14(1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara A. L. Smaal & Joost Dessein & Barend J. Wind & Elke Rogge, 2021. "Social justice-oriented narratives in European urban food strategies: Bringing forward redistribution, recognition and representation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(3), pages 709-727, September.
    2. Desjardins, Ellen & Lubczysnki, John & Xuereb, Marc, 2011. "Incorporating Policies for a Healthy Food System into Land Use Planning: The Case of Waterloo Region, Canada," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 2(1).
    3. Kassis, Grâce & Bertrand, Nathalie, 2022. "Institutional changes in farmland governance emerging from a collective land preservation procedure upholding local food projects: Evidence from a French case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. O’Leary, Nigel & Li, Ian W. & Gupta, Prashant & Blackaby, David, 2020. "Wellbeing trajectories around life events in Australia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 499-509.
    5. Alexandra Titz & Sosten S. Chiotha, 2019. "Pathways for Sustainable and Inclusive Cities in Southern and Eastern Africa through Urban Green Infrastructure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    6. White, James T. & Bunn, Christopher, 2017. "Growing in Glasgow: Innovative practices and emerging policy pathways for urban agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 334-344.
    7. Pilar González-Torre & Jorge Coque, 2016. "How is a food bank managed? Different profiles in Spain," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(1), pages 89-100, March.
    8. Dewaelheyns, Valerie & Lerouge, Frederik & Rogge, Elke & Vranken, Liesbet, 2014. "Garden space: Mapping trade-offs and the adaptive capacity of home food production," Working Papers 187602, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    9. Melanie Bedore, 2014. "The convening power of food as growth machine politics: A study of food policymaking and partnership formation in Baltimore," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(14), pages 2979-2995, November.
    10. Olga N. Buchinskaia, 2023. "Development of paradigmatic ideas in the domestic regional economics by Evgeny Animitsa et al," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 24(2), pages 126-142, July.
    11. Moragues-Faus, Ana & Battersby, Jane, 2021. "Urban food policies for a sustainable and just future: Concepts and tools for a renewed agenda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Gupta, Clare & Campbell, Dave & Munden-Dixon, Kate & Sowerwine, Jennifer & Capps, Shosha & Feenstra, Gail & Van Soelen Kim, Julia, 2018. "Food Policy Councils and Local Governments: Creating Effective Collaboration for Food Systems Change," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 8(B).
    13. Daniela Poli, 2016. "Rivoluzione alimentare e parchi agricoli multifunzionali nella piana fiorentina," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 70-91.
    14. Maximilian Tallgauer & Christoph Schank, 2023. "Rethinking Economics Education for Sustainable Development: A Posthumanist Practice Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Robin Kortright & Sarah Wakefield, 2011. "Edible backyards: a qualitative study of household food growing and its contributions to food security," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(1), pages 39-53, February.
    16. Lenore Newman & Denver Nixon, 2014. "Farming in an Agriburban Ecovillage Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, December.
    17. Sinan Kordon & Patrick A. Miller & Cermetrius L. Bohannon, 2022. "Attitudes and Perceptions of Community Gardens: Making a Place for Them in Our Neighborhoods," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Nadezda Shcherbakova, 2012. "Globalisation Or Autonomy Of A Big City: Evidence From St. Petersburg," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 53-70, JUNE.
    19. Havrda, Marek & Klocek, Adam, 2023. "Well-being impact assessment of artificial intelligence – A search for causality and proposal for an open platform for well-being impact assessment of AI systems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. María José LaRota‐Aguilera & Ana Moragues-Faus, 2025. "Reclaiming Food Insecurity in European Urban Policies: Lessons From Public and Community‐Based Initiatives," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:360432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.