Author
Abstract
This paper explores the critical role of scale in food system planning. Although there is growing awareness of the importance of considering the city-region scale in food system planning, a comprehensive understanding of the scale of planning is lacking in this evolving policy field. This study addresses this gap by analyzing a series of food system planning projects developed at different scales in France. Drawing on document analysis and semi-structured interviews with officials, the paper explores three key dimensions of scale: administrative, action, and governance scales. Findings reveal that there is no relevant one-size-fits-all administrative scale for all food system planning projects. Instead, each administrative scale has its own strengths and limitations. Smaller-scale planning is often more efficient for rapid implementation but may fall into the local trap, whereas larger-scale planning offers a more appropriate scale to meet the food supply-demand balance at a city-region scale but risks a long process of coordination and inefficient implementation. The study identifies local political willingness, legal competences, and spatial appropriateness as significant factors when determining at which scale to develop food system planning. Moreover, the study investigates how localities define “local” within their food system planning practices. They vary from the ambiguous “as close as possible,” administrative units, to quantified distances, but most action scales extend administrative boundaries. Finally, the study identifies locally designed governance strategies to match action scales and administrative scales, with empirical evidence from food system planning experiments applying cross-scalar and cross-local governance models. It also highlights challenges such as unclear distribution of responsibilities among jurisdictions, which hinders local implementation of actions. By providing empirical evidence, the paper contributes to a nuanced understanding of the scale issue in food system planning and emphasizes the importance of governance strategies and institutional design. The paper offers practitioners guidance on identifying and determining the scale of planning and governance strategies, while also providing scholars with directions for future research.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Karetny, Jane & Hoy, Casey & Usher, Kareem & Clark, Jill & Conroy, Maria, 2022.
"Planning toward sustainable food systems: An exploratory assessment of local U.S. food system plans,"
Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 11(4).
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.