IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/15173.html

Environmental And Economic Impacts Of Agricultural Policy Reform: An Interregional Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Painter, Kathleen M.
  • Young, Douglas L.

Abstract

Mathematical programming results revealed that moving toward more flexible agricultural policies would generate substantial economic and environmental gains in a North Carolina diversified cropping region. But in a Washington-Idaho dryland grains region, only the use of relatively new and sometimes problematic alternative cropping systems permitted environmental and economic gains under policy reform. In both regions, a recoupling policy, which links government payments to resource-conserving farming practices, was needed to protect environmental quality when market prices for program crops were high.

Suggested Citation

  • Painter, Kathleen M. & Young, Douglas L., 1994. "Environmental And Economic Impacts Of Agricultural Policy Reform: An Interregional Comparison," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15173
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.15173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15173/files/26020451.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.15173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foster, Thomas H., 1991. "Farm Level Impacts of Reduced Chemical Use on Southern Agriculture: Discussion," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 39-41, July.
    2. James A. Langley & Earl O. Heady & Kent D. Olson, 1982. "Macro Implications of a Complete Transformation of U.S. Agricultural Production to Organic Farming Practices," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 82-wp9, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    3. Foster, Thomas H., 1991. "Farm Level Impacts Of Reduced Chemical Use On Southern Agriculture: Discussion," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(01), pages 1-3, July.
    4. Sun, Henglun & Bergstrom, John C. & Dorfman, Jeffrey H., 1992. "Estimating the Benefits of Groundwater Contamination Control," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 63-71, December.
    5. Ikerd, John E., 1991. "Applying Lisa Concepts On Southern Farms," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(01), pages 1-10, July.
    6. Duffy, Michael & Chase, Craig, 1985. "Impacts of the 1985 Food Security Act on Crop Rotations and Fertilizer Use," ISU General Staff Papers 198501010800001210, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Ikerd, John E., 1991. "Applying Lisa Concepts on Southern Farms," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 43-52, July.
    8. Lansford, Vernon & Madison, Daniel & Thompson, Wyatt & Willott, Brian & Adams, Gary M. & Babcock, Bruce A. & Beghin, John C. & Mohanty, Samarendu & Fuller, Frank H. & Chaudhary, Sudhir & Fabiosa, Jaci, 1999. "FAPRI 1999 U.S. Agricultural Outlook," FAPRI Staff Reports 32049, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    9. Ribaudo, Marc O., 1989. "Water Quality Benefits from the Conservation Reserve Program," Agricultural Economic Reports 308069, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Gregory M. Perry & Bruce A. McCarl & M. Edward Rister & James W. Richardson, 1989. "Modeling Government Program Participation Decisions at the Farm Level," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(4), pages 1011-1020.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chowdhury, Manzoor E. & Lacewell, Ronald D., 1996. "Implications Of Alternative Policies On Nitrate Contamination Of Groundwater," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(01), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Parveen Setia & Bengt Hyberg & Daniel Ugarte & Daryll Ray, 1997. "Planting flexibility: Implications for agricultural sustainability," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 3(3), pages 299-311, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taylor, Donald C., 1992. "Underlying Values and Beliefs "Modern Science" Versus "Sustainable Development"," Economics Staff Papers 232225, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Hrubovcak, James & Vasavada, Utpal & Aldy, Joseph E., 1999. "Green Technologies for a More Sustainable Agriculture," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33721, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Hansen, J. W., 1996. "Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 117-143.
    4. Alain Carpentier & . European Association of Environmental And Resource Economists, 1994. "Some issues on pesticide ban : the example of the French crop sector," Post-Print hal-01947506, HAL.
    5. Parveen Setia & Bengt Hyberg & Daniel Ugarte & Daryll Ray, 1997. "Planting flexibility: Implications for agricultural sustainability," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 3(3), pages 299-311, August.
    6. Debertin, David L. & Pagoulatos, Angelos, "undated". "Production Practices and Systems in Sustainable Agriculture," Staff Papers 200248, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    7. Gretchen Rowe & Elizabeth Brown & Brian Estes, "undated". "SNAP Employment and Training (E&T) Characteristics Study: Final Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports bbdd28b7f5af47eda8cf38c47, Mathematica Policy Research.
    8. Terence centner, 2004. "Developing institutions to encourage the use of animal wastes as production inputs," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 21(4), pages 367-375, January.
    9. Terence Centner & Jeffrey Mullen, 2002. "Enforce Existing Animal Feeding Operations Regulations to Reduce Pollutants," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 16(2), pages 133-144, April.
    10. Gallagher, Paul W. & Otto, Daniel & Shapouri, Hosein & Price, Jeff & Schamel, Guenter & Dikeman, Mark & Brubaker, Heather, 2001. "The Effects of Mtbe Bans on Ethanol Production, Feed Markets, and Local Economies," Staff General Research Papers Archive 2004, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Michelle Wander & Todd Nissen, 2004. "Value of Soil Organic Carbon in Agricultural Lands," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 417-431, October.
    12. Bailey, Ken & Dunn, Jim, "undated". "An Economic Analysis of Federal Order Reform: Implications for Pennsylvania and the Northeast," AE & RS Research Reports 257742, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    13. Önal, Hayri & Monke, James D., 1996. "Incorporating the 1990 Farm Bill into Farm-Level Decision Models: An Application to Cotton Farms: Comment," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 211-213, July.
    14. Ribaudo, Marc & Bouzaher, Aziz, 1994. "Atrazine: Environmental Characteristics and Economics of Management," Agricultural Economic Reports 34011, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Zhang, Fan & Fogarty, James, "undated". "Nonmarket Valuation of Water Sensitive Cities: Current Knowledge and Issues," Working Papers 207694, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    16. Paul Gallagher & Mark Dikeman & John Fritz & Eric Wailes & Wayne Gauthier & Hosein Shapouri, 2003. "Supply and Social Cost Estimates for Biomass from Crop Residues in the United States," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 24(4), pages 335-358, April.
    17. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Heimlich, Ralph & Claassen, Roger & Peters, Mark, 2001. "Least-cost management of nonpoint source pollution: source reduction versus interception strategies for controlling nitrogen loss in the Mississippi Basin," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 183-197, May.
    18. Schneider, Uwe A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2005. "Implications of a Carbon-Based Energy Tax for U.S. Agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(2), pages 265-279, October.
    19. Manchanda, Sumit & Kliebenstein, James B. & McKean, James D., 1995. "Economic Comparison of Alternatives to Sulfamethazine Use in Pork Production," ISU General Staff Papers 199507010700001265, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    20. Ochoa, Rene F. & Anderson, David P. & Outlaw, Joe L. & Richardson, James W. & Knutson, Ronald D. & Schwart Jr, Robert B. & Miller, John W., "undated". "Mexican Representative Farms 1998 Economic Outlook," Working Papers 258080, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.