IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlorco/163752.html

Preferences for rural credit systems and their impact on the implementation of credit unions in Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Glenk, Klaus
  • Pavliashvili, Johanna
  • Profeta, Adriano

Abstract

Insufficient access to rural credit institutions, the absence of marketing chains for agricultural products and limited application of advanced farming technology are the main development constraints in the Georgian agricultural sector. To research farmers’ demand for rural financial services a representative household survey was conducted early 2008 in the region of Shida Kartli (N=406). The survey included a choice experiment to investigate farmer’s preferences for characteristics of particular credit schemes. Results show that segments of the farmer population differ in their preferences for loan attributes. Furthermore, farmers expressed a very high demand for small credits with individual liability, and one third of them have experience with loans. These findings provide useful information for future credit cooperatives. Barriers to implementation are lack of trust among farmers and misconception of cooperatives with the former Soviet kolkhozes. Information campaigns can therefore be a key ingredient for the successful establishment of credit cooperatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenk, Klaus & Pavliashvili, Johanna & Profeta, Adriano, 2009. "Preferences for rural credit systems and their impact on the implementation of credit unions in Georgia," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 37(01), pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlorco:163752
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.163752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/163752/files/Glenk%20jrc37-1_2009_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.163752?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johan F. M. Swinnen, 2002. "Transition and Integration in Europe: Implications for Agricultural and Food Markets, Policy, and Trade Agreements," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 481-501, April.
    2. Beatriz Armendáriz de Aghion & Jonathan Morduch, 2000. "Microfinance Beyond Group Lending," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 8(2), pages 401-420, July.
    3. Lerman, Zvi & Kislev, Yoav & Biton, David & Kriss, Alon, 2003. "Agricultural Output and Productivity in the Former Soviet Republics," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(4), pages 999-1018, July.
    4. Dufhues, Thomas, 2007. "Accessing rural finance: the rural financial market in Northern Vietnam," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 36, number 92327.
    5. Vigenina, Denotes & Kritikos, Alexander S., 2004. "The individual micro-lending contract: is it a better design than joint-liability?: Evidence from Georgia," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 155-176, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paviliashvili, Johanna, 2009. "Servicekooperativen – Ein Modell Für Die Georgische Landwirtschaft?," IAMO Discussion Papers 91767, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    2. Pavliashvili, Johanna, 2009. "Servicekooperativen: Ein Modell für die georgische Landwirtschaft? [Service cooperatives – A model for the Georgian agriculture?]," IAMO Discussion Papers 125, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander S. Kritikos & Christoph Kneiding & Claas Christian Germelmann, 2006. "Is there a Market for Micro-Lending in Industrialized Countries? - Evidence from Germany," Working Papers 0003, Gesellschaft für Arbeitsmarktaktivierung (GfA).
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13356 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Müller, Kirsten & Mußhoff, Oliver & Weber, Ron, 2014. "The More the Better? How Collateral Levels Affect Credit Risk in Agricultural Microfinance," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260815, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    4. Römer, Ulf & Weber, Ron & Mußhoff, Oliver & Turvey, Calcum G., 2017. "Truth and consequences: Bogus pipeline experiment in informal small business lending," DARE Discussion Papers 1702, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    5. Johan Swinnen & Kym Anderson, 2008. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe's Transition Economies," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6502, April.
    6. Mustansar, Talreja, 2023. "Financial innovation, technological improvement and bank’ profitability," OSF Preprints 8wy95, Center for Open Science.
    7. Hubert Tchakoute Tchuigoua, 2011. "Contrat de crédit, décentralisation décisionnelle et performance des institutions de microfinance," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 14(2), pages 143-173, June.
    8. Vigenina, Denotes & Kritikos, Alexander S., 2004. "The individual micro-lending contract: is it a better design than joint-liability?: Evidence from Georgia," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 155-176, June.
    9. Alexander Tedeschi, Gwendolyn, 2006. "Here today, gone tomorrow: Can dynamic incentives make microfinance more flexible?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 84-105, June.
    10. Mohamed, Toka S. & Elgammal, Mohammed M., 2023. "Credit risk in Islamic microfinance institutions: The role of women, groups, and rural borrowers," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    11. repec:jaf:journl:v:13:y:2022:i:1:n:433 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Rao, Smriti, 2008. "Reforms with a Female Face: Gender, Liberalization, and Economic Policy in Andhra Pradesh, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1213-1232, July.
    13. Prabirendra Chatterjee & Sudipta, Sarangi, "undated". "Social Identity and Group Lending," Working Papers UWEC-2005-06-R, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
    14. Dries, Liesbeth & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2002. "Finance, Investments And Restructuring In Polish Agriculture," PRG Working Papers 31881, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance.
    15. Daniele TUEDEM WAFFO & Jules Roger FEUDJO & dagobert NGONGANG, 2016. "Mécanismes de gestion du risque de crédit ex ante et performance globale des EMF camerounais," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 7(2), pages 53-69, November.
    16. Weber, Ron & Mußhoff, Oliver & Petrick, Martin, 2014. "How flexible repayment schedules affect credit risk in agricultural microfinance," DARE Discussion Papers 1404, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    17. Janda, Karel & Zetek, Pavel, 2014. "Mikrofinanční Revoluce: Aktuální Kontroverze A Výzvy [Microfinance Revolution: Recent Controversies And Challenges]," MPRA Paper 54098, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Veronique Beckers & Jeroen Beckers & Matthias Vanmaercke & Etienne Van Hecke & Anton Van Rompaey & Nicolas Dendoncker, 2018. "Modelling Farm Growth and Its Impact on Agricultural Land Use: A Country Scale Application of an Agent-Based Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Nebal Al Maaitah, 2019. "The Legitimacy of Profit of Microlending Institutions and Womens Empowerment: A Case Study from Jordan," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 15(01), pages 3-17.
    20. Kreuz, Claudia., 2006. "Microlending in Germany," ILO Working Papers 993885023402676, International Labour Organization.
    21. Weber, Ron & Musshoff, Oliver, 2015. "Does pre-defined flexibility come with teh cost of higher credit risk? Evidence from agricultural micro lending in Madagascar," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211905, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    22. Ben Soltane BASSEM, 2011. "Governance Quality and MFIS Repayment Performance," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 8, pages 159-168, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlorco:163752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caehuil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.