IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijag24/344420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of the User Innovation Model in Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Food Processing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Kuberska, Dominika
  • Grzybowska-Brzezińska, Mariola
  • Zachłowski, Patryk

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify the degree of implementation of the user innovation (UI) model in selected food processing industries in Poland and it was achieved through the following research objectives: (1) to identify the sources of information used in the course of innovation processes by innovative enterprises – divided into external and internal sources, (2) to determine to what extent users (consumers in particular) are involved in the course of individual stages of the innovation process, and (3) to compare the degree of consumer involvement in the course of innovation processes with the innovation level of innovative enterprises. Primary data was obtained through an interview method (a survey employing the CAWI method), conducted among 215 micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises in the meat processing, juice production, and milk processing industries. The time scope of the survey was 2018–2019 and the survey was conducted in mid-2021. Approximately two-thirds of innovative enterprises use information from consumers during the innovation process and consumers are involved to a different degree in its respective stages. Most often enterprises engage consumers during the stage of innovation impulse, creating and testing prototypes. A significant share of innovative enterprises uses information from consumers during the innovation process. The companies that reported the highest number of innovations were, to a large extent, those that involved consumers at more stages of the innovation process. The application of the UI model assumptions can be considered as conducive to shaping innovativeness of the analyzed food processing industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuberska, Dominika & Grzybowska-Brzezińska, Mariola & Zachłowski, Patryk, 2023. "Implementation of the User Innovation Model in Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Food Processing Industry," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 377(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijag24:344420
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344420/files/Kuberska.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344420?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barrena-Martínez, Jesús & Cricelli, Livio & Ferrándiz, Esther & Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele, 2020. "Joint forces: Towards an integration of intellectual capital theory and the open innovation paradigm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 261-270.
    2. Bogers, Marcel & Foss, Nicolai J. & Lyngsie, Jacob, 2018. "The “human side” of open innovation: The role of employee diversity in firm-level openness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 218-231.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amirthanathan Prashanthan, 2025. "Development of Integrated Open Innovation Based Knowledge Management Framework in Telecommunication Organization," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 1055-1071, May.
    2. Qian Wang & Luqun Xie & Di Zhu, 2024. "Educational level of researchers in spin-out R&D units and external technology acquisition: The higher, the more?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 236-261, February.
    3. Vittorio Corsi, 2022. "Human Resource Management and Diversity Management. Some Emerging Evidence about the Effects on Organizational Performance," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 1-2.
    4. Anna Walecka, 2021. "The Role of Relational Capital in Anti-Crisis Measures Undertaken by Companies—Conclusions from a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Marte C.W. Solheim & Ron Boschma & Sverre Herstad, 2018. "Related variety, unrelated variety and the novelty content of firm innovation in urban and non-urban locations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1836, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2018.
    6. Li, Keyao & Griffin, Mark A., 2023. "Unpacking human systems in data science innovations: Key innovator perspectives," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Yildirim, Ercan & AR, Ilker Murat & Dabić, Marina & Baki, Birdogan & Peker, Iskender, 2022. "A multi-stage decision making model for determining a suitable innovation structure using an open innovation approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 379-391.
    8. Muhammad Qamar Zia & Tobias M. Huning & Muhammad Sufyan Ramish & Muhammad Naveed & Shiraz Ahmed, 2024. "The impact of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior: a moderated mediation model of informal learning and proactive behavior," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3695-3716, December.
    9. Monica Violeta Achim & Alexandra Ioana Daniela Rus & Nawazish Mirza, 2024. "How does intellectual capital spur innovation in economy? A cross-country survey," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3125-3154, December.
    10. Tsinopoulos, Christos & Yan, Ji & Sousa, Carlos M.P., 2019. "Abandoning innovation activities and performance: The moderating role of openness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1399-1411.
    11. Andreeva, Tatiana & Garanina, Tatiana & Sáenz, Josune & Aramburu, Nekane & Kianto, Aino, 2021. "Does country environment matter in the relationship between intellectual capital and innovation performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 263-273.
    12. Jan Kratzer & Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß & Gunter Festel, 2021. "Glancing through Two Decades of Research on the Human Side of Sustainable Innovation : The Past, the Present, and Directions for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, June.
    13. Barrett, Gillian & Tsekouras, George, 2022. "A tango with a gorilla: An exploration of the microfoundations of open innovation partnerships between young innovative companies and multi-national enterprises," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Rhaiem, Khalil & Doloreux, David, 2024. "Inbound open innovation in SMEs: A microfoundations perspective of dynamic capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    15. Madugba Joseph Ugochukwu & Egbide Ben-Caleb & Uzondu Anoruoh Paul & Oparah Vivian Iheaku & Adesola Deborah Ayomide, 2023. "Intellectual Capital Value Addition and the Efficient Assets Management of Listed Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 241-260, December.
    16. Grimaldi, Michele & Greco, Marco & Cricelli, Livio, 2021. "A framework of intellectual property protection strategies and open innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 156-164.
    17. Wasim ul Rehman & Faryal Jalil & Omur Saltik & Suleyman Degirmen & Mustafa Bekmezci, 2024. "Leveraging Strategic Innovation and Process Capabilities for Intellectual Capital Initiative Performance of Higher Education Institutes (HEIs): A Knowledge-Based Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4161-4202, March.
    18. Maoyan She & Die Hu & Yuandi Wang & Li Li, 2023. "How do top management team characteristics affect government R&D subsidy grants? Evidence from an information economics perspective," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 330-353, February.
    19. Marzi, Giacomo & Fakhar Manesh, Mohammad & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Vlačić, Božidar, 2023. "Do or do not. Cognitive configurations affecting open innovation adoption in SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Oleg Sergeevich Sukharev, 2023. "Intellectual Firm: Key Features and Development Models," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1091-1119, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijag24:344420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.