IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/335086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing food waste from social innovation perspective: a review of measures, research gaps and future directions

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Guoqing
  • Liu, Shaofeng
  • Wang, Yi
  • Lopez, Carmen
  • Ong, Aira
  • Chen, Xiaoning

Abstract

Food waste (FW) has been increasingly recognized as a severe environmental, social, and economic problem. Therefore, it should be tackled innovatively by analyzing and synthesizing existing solutions. This study aims to achieve a comprehensive understanding of different social innovation measures adopted for reducing FW using a systematic literature review. After locating, collecting, evaluating, and analyzing 50 publications from four databases, we conclude that social innovation activities such as digital food-sharing platforms, social supermarkets, solidarity stores, and food rescue hubs are widely deployed in different FW reduction processes. Based on the findings, we synthesized several research gaps and proposed corresponding future research directions related to research methodology, country, food redistribution, food rescue, food donation, and food sharing. These directions include conducting research to develop suitable key performance indicators to evaluate the performance of digital food-sharing platforms, linking with specific theory to conduct empirical research on partnership analysis regarding social supermarkets, and investigating the structure of multiplex relations among different participants in the food rescue activities using social network analysis. We suggest that more keywords should be scrutinized and included when searching publications in future research as keyword selection is subjective.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Guoqing & Liu, Shaofeng & Wang, Yi & Lopez, Carmen & Ong, Aira & Chen, Xiaoning, 2022. "Reducing food waste from social innovation perspective: a review of measures, research gaps and future directions," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(2), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:335086
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.335086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/335086/files/ifamr2022.0006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.335086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:335086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.