IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/iepeoa/186514.html

Competitiveness Of Destinations Within The Rural Tourism Cluster: Zlatar, Zlatibor

Author

Listed:
  • Sanja, Pavlović
  • Gordana, Čavlin

Abstract

Cluster analysis is gaining increasing importance in the contemporary development of tourism. These are mostly areas that have similar tourist values. This paper presents the competitiveness of tourist destinations in the cluster of rural tourism Zlatar, Zlatibor, as defined in the Master Plan for Sustainable Development of Rural Tourism in Serbia. Having used AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) criteria pairs have been first compared, and then the alternatives (villages of Zlatar and Zlatibor). The seven criteria used in this paper are the following: factors and attractors, accessibility and infrastructure, accommodation facilities, unemployment, experience in rural tourism, proximity of the marketplace, and seasonality. The AHP method has been used to determine relations between the influence factors and the dominance of one factor in relation to another.It has been noted a relatively weak dominance of the villages of Zlatibor, by all criteria, except when it comes to unemployment, which is dominated by the villages of Zlatar.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanja, Pavlović & Gordana, Čavlin, 2014. "Competitiveness Of Destinations Within The Rural Tourism Cluster: Zlatar, Zlatibor," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iepeoa:186514
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.186514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/186514/files/4%20EP%203%202014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.186514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanagustín Fons, M. Victoria & Fierro, José A. Moseñe & Patiño, María Gómez y, 2011. "Rural tourism: A sustainable alternative," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 551-557, February.
    2. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Thuy Linh Nguyen & Chisato Asahi & Thi An Tran & Ngoc Hanh Le, 2022. "Indicator-based approach for flood vulnerability assessment in ancient heritage city of Hoi An, Central Region of Vietnam," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 2357-2385, November.
    3. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    4. Hannia Gonzalez-Urango & Mónica García-Melón, 2017. "A Multicriteria Model to Evaluate Strategic Plans for the Nautical and Naval Industry in Cartagena de Indias, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Yeh, Ching-Chiang & Chen, Yi-Fan, 2018. "Critical success factors for adoption of 3D printing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 209-216.
    6. Pasura Aungkulanon & Walailak Atthirawong & Pongchanun Luangpaiboon, 2023. "Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for Strategic Decision Making in Electric Vehicle Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Wu, Zhangsheng & Li, Yue & Wang, Rong & Xu, Xu & Ren, Dongyang & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huang, Guanhua, 2023. "Evaluation of irrigation water saving and salinity control practices of maize and sunflower in the upper Yellow River basin with an agro-hydrological model based method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    8. Tsige Gebregergs Tesfay & Mulu Bayray Kahsay, 2025. "Enhancing Rural Electrification in Tigray: A Geospatial Approach to Hybrid Wind-Solar Site Selection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-30, October.
    9. D’Inverno, Giovanna & Carosi, Laura & Romano, Giulia & Guerrini, Andrea, 2018. "Water pollution in wastewater treatment plants: An efficiency analysis with undesirable output," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 24-34.
    10. Paul, Swarup & Sarkar, Bijan & Bose, P.K., 2015. "Eclectic decision for the selection of tree borne oil (TBO) as alternative fuel for internal combustion engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 256-263.
    11. Jiangning Cao & Yasir Ahmed Solangi, 2023. "Analyzing and Prioritizing the Barriers and Solutions of Sustainable Agriculture for Promoting Sustainable Development Goals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Bruno Martin de Alcântara Dias & Cynthia Thamires da Silva & Rui Esteves Araújo & Ricardo de Castro & Eduardo Lorenzetti Pellini & Cláudio Pinto & Armando Antônio Maria Laganá, 2022. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process for Selecting Battery Equalization Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Trap, M.L. & Huisman, D. & Goverde, R.M.P., 2016. "Design of a robust railway line system for severe winter conditions in The Netherlands," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-08, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    14. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Ricardo Ribeiro Nascimento & Eduardo Antonio Gomes Marques & Gustavo Ferreira Simões, 2023. "Application of the AHP method for prioritizing actions to reduce risk associated with gravitational mass movements in areas along the margins of watercourses of the city of Rio Branco, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1591-1613, March.
    16. Bhatt, Brijesh & Singh, Anoop, 2021. "Power sector reforms and technology adoption in the Indian electricity distribution sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    17. Pathiraja, Erandathie & Griffith, Garry & Farquharson, Robert & Faggia, Rob, 2019. "The Cost of Climate Change to Agricultural Industries: Coconuts in Sri Lanka," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(05), December.
    18. Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Odigie, O. & Munda, J.L., 2018. "A multi-criteria GIS based model for wind farm site selection using interval type-2 fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: The case study of Nigeria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1853-1869.
    19. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    20. Alicja Stoltmann, 2020. "Hybrid Multi-Criteria Method of Analyzing the Location of Distributed Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iepeoa:186514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iepbgyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.