IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/iaal25/358249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing traditional and machine learning techniques in apartments mass appraisal in Fortaleza, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • de Oliveira, Antônio Augusto Ferreira
  • Reyes-Bueno, Fabián
  • González, Marco Aurelio Stumpf
  • da Silva, Everton

Abstract

Mass appraisal has significant applications, such as urban planning, real estate appraisal, and property tax. Due to the challenges of analyzing massive models, they are often developed using semi-automatic assessment methods and machine learning techniques. This article explores different appraisal model methods that utilize statistics and machine learning. It also looks at incorporating spatial information to see if the chosen method can effectively capture the typical spatial dependency of the real estate market. This can help reduce the spatial autocorrelation observed in the residuals. The study compared nine machine learning methods with traditional statistical approaches using a dataset of over 43,000 apartments in Fortaleza, Brazil. The results of the machine learning algorithms were similar. The XGBoost minimized spatial autocorrelation. The easiest interpretations were with MRA, M5P, and MARS techniques. Although, these techniques had the greatest residual spatial autocorrelations. There is a trade-off between the methods, depending on whether the aim is to improve accuracy or provide a clear explanation for property taxation.

Suggested Citation

  • de Oliveira, Antônio Augusto Ferreira & Reyes-Bueno, Fabián & González, Marco Aurelio Stumpf & da Silva, Everton, 2025. "Comparing traditional and machine learning techniques in apartments mass appraisal in Fortaleza, Brazil," Aestimum, , vol. 85.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaal25:358249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/358249/files/OP09051_21-38_02-15344-Ferreir.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaal25:358249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.