IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/frrfes/329941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Torn between responsibility and loyalty: how the veterinarian profession designs antibiotic resistance policies that shake its foundations

Author

Listed:
  • Surdez, Muriel
  • Piquerez, Lorène
  • Hobeika, Alexandre

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) policies, which aim to redefine how antibiotics are used, reshape the veterinary profession’s relationships in at least two ways. The policies can give state veterinarians greater power over practising veterinarians and thus change the relationship between the profession and the government supposed to regulate it. The policies also call for coordination with other relevant professionals, mainly in the areas of human medicine and food safety, which can limit the veterinary profession’s autonomous decision-making. Based on a survey of veterinarians working at different levels of the administration and their non-veterinary colleagues in Switzerland, it is shown that AMR policies, by strengthening the administration’s planning and supervisory functions, do contribute to increased state control of the veterinary profession. However, this shift is limited because implementing the policies requires negotiating with representatives of the profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Surdez, Muriel & Piquerez, Lorène & Hobeika, Alexandre, 2020. "Torn between responsibility and loyalty: how the veterinarian profession designs antibiotic resistance policies that shake its foundations," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 102(1), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:frrfes:329941
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329941/files/s41130-020-00122-y.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.329941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Alam, 2009. "La vache folle et les vétérinaires. Récit d’une victoire inattendue et paradoxale sur le terrain de la sécurité sanitaire des aliments," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 90(4), pages 373-398.
    2. Fritz Sager & Eva Thomann & Christine Zollinger & Nico van der Heiden & Céline Mavrot, 2014. "Street-level Bureaucrats and New Modes of Governance: How conflicting roles affect the implementation of the Swiss Ordinance on Veterinary Medicinal Products," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 481-502, May.
    3. Paul Verbruggen & Tetty Havinga, 2017. "Hybridization of food governance: An analytical framework," Chapters, in: Paul Verbruggen & Tetty Havinga (ed.), Hybridization of Food Governance, chapter 1, pages 1-28, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Hinchliffe, Steve, 2015. "More than one world, more than one health: Re-configuring interspecies health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 28-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muriel Surdez & Lorène Piquerez & Alexandre Hobeika, 2021. "Torn between responsibility and loyalty: how the veterinarian profession designs antibiotic resistance policies that shake its foundations," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 191-211, June.
    2. Patrick Baur, 2020. "When farmers are pulled in too many directions: comparing institutional drivers of food safety and environmental sustainability in California agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1175-1194, December.
    3. Bonnaud, Laure & Fortané, Nicolas, 2021. "Being a vet: the veterinary profession in social science research," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 102(1), April.
    4. Julia Behringer & Peter H. Feindt, 2019. "How Shall We Judge Agri-Food Governance? Legitimacy Constructions in Food Democracy and Co-Regulation Discourses," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 119-130.
    5. Krithika Srinivasan & Tim Kurz & Pradeep Kuttuva & Chris Pearson, 2019. "Reorienting rabies research and practice: Lessons from India," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Hani Nouman & Nissim Cohen, 2023. "When active representation is not enough: ethnic minority street-level workers in a divided society and policy entrepreneurship," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 777-795, December.
    7. Andrea Butcher & Jose A. Cañada & Salla Sariola, 2021. "How to make noncoherent problems more productive: Towards an AMR management plan for low resource livestock sectors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Sébastien Lambelet, 2023. "Unintended policy integration through entrepreneurship at the implementation stage," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 161-189, March.
    9. Camille Bellet & Lindsay Hamilton & Jonathan Rushton, 2021. "Re-thinking public health: Towards a new scientific logic of routine animal health care in European industrial farming," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Davis, Alicia & Sharp, Jo, 2020. "Rethinking One Health: Emergent human, animal and environmental assemblages," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Alex Hughes & Emma Roe & Suzanne Hocknell, 2021. "Food supply chains and the antimicrobial resistance challenge: On the framing, accomplishments and limitations of corporate responsibility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1373-1390, September.
    12. Lelieveldt, Herman, 2023. "Food industry influence in collaborative governance: The case of the Dutch prevention agreement on overweight," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Rock, Melanie J. & Rault, Dawn & Degeling, Chris, 2017. "Dog-bites, rabies and One Health: Towards improved coordination in research, policy and practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 126-133.
    14. Jose A Cañada, 2019. "Hybrid Threats and Preparedness Strategies: The Reconceptualization of Biological Threats and Boundaries in Global Health Emergencies," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(1), pages 93-110, March.
    15. Lucia Francesca Menna & Antonio Santaniello & Margherita Todisco & Alessia Amato & Luca Borrelli & Cristiano Scandurra & Alessandro Fioretti, 2019. "The Human–Animal Relationship as the Focus of Animal-Assisted Interventions: A One Health Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-10, September.
    16. Eva Lieberherr & Eva Thomann, 2020. "Linking throughput and output legitimacy in Swiss forest policy implementation," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 495-533, September.
    17. Lisa Hansson & Åsa Weinholt, 2019. "New Frontline Actors Emerging from Cross-Sector Collaboration: Examples from the Fire and Rescue Service Sector," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 519-539, December.
    18. Laure Bonnaud & Nicolas Fortané, 2021. "Being a vet: the veterinary profession in social science research," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 125-149, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:frrfes:329941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.