IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/eeaeje/343228.html

Economic Welfare in Ethiopia: Growth Scenarios for Exiting Poverty

Author

Listed:
  • Goshu, Degye

Abstract

Poverty alleviation and equitable distribution of benefits among citizens are the overriding welfare objectives of developing countries. Ethiopia has been designing and implementing several development policies and interventions to attain such welfare objectives. However, poverty alleviation is still the primary development agenda of the country and the distribution of poverty across regions and population subgroups is becoming worrisome. In order to generate latest, relevant and reliable empirical evidence on these welfare issues, the third wave (2015) of the Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS) dataset on Ethiopian was utilized. A sample of 4954 households with 22,296 household members covering all regions and cities were utilized for rigorous distributive analysis. FGT poverty indices and the time taken to exit poverty were estimated and decomposed by population subgroups and expenditure components. A right-censored Tobit model of welfare ratio was employed to identify the correlates of poverty and to predict the intensity and probability of poverty. The results of distributive analysis show that absolute poverty rate in Ethiopia was 22.1 percent with significant variation across regional states. Absolute poverty was also largely different by gender, place of residence (rural-urban), and religion. Similarly, depth and severity of poverty (6% and 2.4%) were varied across regions. Based on different growth scenarios of consumption expenditure per capita assumed (14%, 11%, 8%, and 5), the poor in Ethiopia would take 9.4-26.4 years to exit poverty. The Tobit model outputs indicated that the expected welfare ratio of the poor was 0.783, which was 21.3 percent far below the poverty line (ETB 14758). The likelihood of individuals to be poor was 22.0 percent, which is consistent to the FGT index (22.1%, about 22.1 million population). Poverty decomposition results show that absolute poverty rate in Ethiopia was highly attributable to rural areas (24.1%) with relative contribution of 88.5 percent compared to their counterparts in urban centers (12.7%). Similarly, decomposition of poverty by expenditure components verify that the absolute contribution of food consumption expenditure in reducing total poverty was 65.3 percent, whereas nonfood consumption expenditure contributed only 11.4 percent. The findings clearly suggest the need to design and implement relevant poverty reduction interventions for attaining Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) of ending poverty and hunger in all its forms by 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • Goshu, Degye, 2019. "Economic Welfare in Ethiopia: Growth Scenarios for Exiting Poverty," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 28(02), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eeaeje:343228
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/343228/files/Economic%20Welfare%20in%20Ethiopia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.343228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foster, James & Greer, Joel & Thorbecke, Erik, 1984. "A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 761-766, May.
    2. repec:wbk:wbpubs:11985 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shijiang Chen & Mingyue Liang & Wen Yang, 2022. "Does Digital Financial Inclusion Reduce China’s Rural Household Vulnerability to Poverty: An Empirical Analysis From the Perspective of Household Entrepreneurship," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    2. Khanna, Neha, 2000. "Measuring environmental quality: an index of pollution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 191-202, November.
    3. Do, Manh Hung & Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Grote, Ulrike, 2023. "Land consolidation, rice production, and agricultural transformation: Evidence from household panel data for Vietnam," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 157-173.
    4. Clarke, Philip & Erreygers, Guido, 2020. "Defining and measuring health poverty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    5. Nguyen, Cuong, 2003. "A Review of the Relation between Economic Growth, Inequality and Poverty," MPRA Paper 85705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Teguh Dartanto, 2010. "Volatility of World Rice Prices, Import Tariffs and Poverty in Indonesia : A CGE-Microsimulation Analysis," Economics and Finance in Indonesia, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, vol. 58, pages 335-364, December.
    7. Nguyen Viet Cuong, 2009. "Updating Poverty Maps without Panel Data: Evidence from Vietnam," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 23(4), pages 397-418, December.
    8. Davidson, Russell & Flachaire, Emmanuel, 2007. "Asymptotic and bootstrap inference for inequality and poverty measures," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 141-166, November.
    9. Chakravarty, Satya R. & Deutsch, Joseph & Silber, Jacques, 2008. "On the Watts Multidimensional Poverty Index and its Decomposition," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1067-1077, June.
    10. Servaas van der Berg & Ronelle Burger & Megan Louw, 2007. "Post-Apartheid South Africa: Poverty and Distribution Trends in an Era of Globalization," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2007-57, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Xuming He & Heng Xi & Xianbo Li, 2024. "Multi-Dimensional Decomposition, Measurement, and Governance Mechanism of Relative Poverty in Chinese Households under the Goal of Common Prosperity: Empirical Analysis Based on CFPS2020 Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Seyoung Chae & Almas Heshmati, 2024. "The effects of lifetime work experience on incidence and severity of elderly poverty in Korea," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 26(2), pages 521-554, August.
    13. Hongliang Wang & Yiwen Yu, 2016. "Increasing health inequality in China: An empirical study with ordinal data," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 14(1), pages 41-61, March.
    14. Ametoglo, Muriel Eyram Silo & Guo, Ping, 2016. "Inequality, poverty and inclusive growth in TOGO: An Assessment of the Survey Data," MPRA Paper 79705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Alejandro Lopez-Feldman, 2013. "Climate change, agriculture, and poverty: A household level analysis for rural Mexico," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(2), pages 1126-1139.
    16. Nguezet, Paul Martin Dontsop & Diagne, Aliou & Okoruwa, Victor Olusegun & Ojehomon, Vivian, 2011. "Impact of Improved Rice Technology (NERICA varieties) on Income and Poverty among Rice Farming Households in Nigeria: A Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) Approach," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 50(3), pages 1-25.
    17. Brunori, Paolo & Ferreira, Francisco & Lugo, Maria Ana & Peragine, Vito, 2013. "Opportunity-sensitive poverty measurement," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6728, The World Bank.
    18. Dohmen, Thomas & Meyer, Frauke & Walkowitz, Gari, 2026. "Basic Needs Satisfaction as a Fundamental Distributive Principle: Evidence from the Lab and the Field," IZA Discussion Papers 18409, IZA Network @ LISER.
    19. Alonso-Villar, Olga & del Río, Coral, 2010. "Local versus overall segregation measures," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 30-38, July.
    20. World Bank, 2009. "Guatemala - Poverty assessment : good performance at low levels," World Bank Publications - Reports 3063, The World Bank Group.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eeaeje:343228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eeaa2ea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.