IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ecjilt/141074.html

Exploring the Influence of International Agreements on the Development of Science-based Regulatory Systems in Developing Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan, Camille
  • McDonald, Jillian
  • Smyth, Stuart J.

Abstract

This article examines three developing countries to identify capacities for innovative science policy: Brazil, South Africa and the Philippines. Using membership in regional trading agreements, we assess whether these three nations have aligned their science/innovation policy with the partners of their trading agreements. This assessment provides insights into the potential trade-offs that other developing nations will need to consider as they contemplate the adoption of genetically modified crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan, Camille & McDonald, Jillian & Smyth, Stuart J., . "Exploring the Influence of International Agreements on the Development of Science-based Regulatory Systems in Developing Economies," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:141074
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.141074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/141074/files/ryanmcdonaldsmyth13-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.141074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stads, Gert-Jan & Faylon, Patricio S. & Buendia, Leah J., 2007. "Agricultural R&D in the Philippines: Policy, investments, and institutional profile," ASTI country reports 32821, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Stads, Gert-Jan & Faylon, Patricio S. & Buendia, Leah J., 2007. "Agricultural R&D in the Philippines: Policy, investments, and institutional profile," ASTI country briefs 778453592, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Stads, Gert-Jan & Faylon, Patricio S. & Buendia, Leah J., 2007. "Agricultural R&D in the Philippines: Policy, investments, and institutional profile," ASTI country briefs 32328, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Richard E. Just & Julian M. Alston & David Zilberman (ed.), 2006. "Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy," Natural Resource Management and Policy, Springer, number 978-0-387-36953-2, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konduru, Srinivasa & Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G. & Magnier, Alexandre, 2009. "GMO Testing Strategies and Implications for Trade: A Game Theoretic Approach," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49594, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Sedjo, Roger, 2010. "How do environmental regulations affect investments in biofuel and biofuel R&D?: the case of transgenic trees," 14th ICABR Conference, June 16-18, 2010, Ravello, Italy 188107, International Consortium on Applied Bioeconomy Research (ICABR).
    3. David E. Ervin & Leland L. Glenna & Raymond A. Jussaume, 2011. "The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(6), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Robin Roff, 2009. "No alternative? The politics and history of non-GMO certification," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 26(4), pages 351-363, December.
    5. Erickson, Kenneth W. & Featherstone, Allen M. & Subedi, Dipak & Nehring, Richard F. & Harris, James Michael, "undated". "How Fluctuations in Farm and Off-Farm Income Could Affect the Financial Performance of U.S. Farm Operator Dairy Farms: A Farm-level Analysis," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258488, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Mitchell, Paul D., 2011. "Economic Assessment of the Benefits of Chloro-s-triazine Herbicides to U.S. Corn, Sorghum, and Sugarcane Producers," Staff Paper Series 564, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    7. Paulina Kubisz & Graham Dalton & Edward Majewski & Kinga Pogodzińska, 2021. "Facts and Myths about GM Food—The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Pardey, Philip G. & Alston, Julian M. & Ruttan, Vernon W., 2010. "The Economics of Innovation and Technical Change in Agriculture," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 939-984, Elsevier.
    9. Shakya, Sumadhur & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2013. "Valuing New Random Genetically Modified (GM) Traits in Corn," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(01), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Julian M. Alston & Philip G. Pardey, 2020. "Innovation, Growth, and Structural Change in American Agriculture," NBER Chapters, in: The Role of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth, pages 123-165, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Clem Tisdell, 2013. "Economics, ecology and GMOs: sustainability, precaution and related issues," Chapters, in: M. A. Quaddus & M. A.B. Siddique (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development Planning, chapter 5, pages 91-118, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Pamela J. Smith & Erik S. Katovich, 2017. "Are GMO Policies “Trade Related”? Empirical Analysis of Latin America," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(2), pages 286-312.
    13. GianCarlo Moschini, 2008. "Biotechnology and the development of food markets: retrospect and prospects," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 35(3), pages 331-355, September.
    14. E.-A. Nuppenau & T.S Amjath Babu, 2009. "Apples compared to Apples: Attitudes towards cisgenic and transgenic breeds," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 2(1), pages 113-142.
    15. Tiffany Shih & Brian Wright, 2011. "Agricultural Innovation," NBER Chapters, in: Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors, pages 49-85, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. David Zilberman & Gal Hochman & Steven E. Sexton, 2008. "Food Safety, the Environment, and Trade," World Bank Publications - Reports 28195, The World Bank Group.
    17. Cyrlene Claasen & Julia Roloff, 2012. "The Link Between Responsibility and Legitimacy: The Case of De Beers in Namibia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 379-398, May.
    18. Zilberman, David & Graff, Gregory & Hochman, Gal & Kaplan, Scott, . "The Political Economy of Biotechnology," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(04).
    19. Gray, Emily M. & Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z., 2008. "Uncertainty aversion in Australian regulation of agricultural gene technology," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6045, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    20. Pardey, Philip G. & James, Jennifer S. & Alston, Julian M. & Wood, Stanley & Koo, Bonwoo & Binenbaum, Eran & Hurley, Terrance M. & Glewwe, Paul & Mayer, Jorge & Jones, Richard & De Groote, Hugo & Kana, 2007. "Science, Technology and Skills," Reports 136256, University of Minnesota, International Science and Technology Practice and Policy.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:141074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esteyca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.