IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/364295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological optimisation of vegetable production as a factor of the industry capitalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Lohosha, Roman
  • Lutkovska, Svitlana
  • Pidvalna, Oksana
  • Pronko, Lyudmila
  • Kolesnyk, Tetiana

Abstract

Purpose. The paper aims to present the concept and methodology for identifying ecologically and economically consistent parameters of production processes in vegetable growing. Methodology / approach. The research methodology assumes that crop production efficiency can be assessed by the carbon balance, where such a balance can have a specific economic expression as one of the efficiency criteria. The above is proposed to be carried out on the basis of the authors’ approach to assessing ecologically and economically consistent parameters of production processes in vegetable growing by the dynamics and balance of soil organic matter (humus). Results. The paper presents the results of the study of environmental problems of modern vegetable production, which provided the basis for a new interpretation of productivity, costs, efficiency, and balance of the industry. This interpretation was carried out on the basis of actual material on the industry operation in Ukraine as a whole and on the example of individual enterprises of the Vinnytsia region. On this basis, a complex – ecological and economic – criterion of production efficiency was proposed, as well as possible ways to solve the problem of environmental risks through the formation of a special type of management. One of the results was the empirical reflection of the processes of using and reproducing fertility as a capital-forming factor of long-term investment action in industry models. Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, a description of the dynamics of Ukrainian vegetable production over the last 35 years was carried out as a separate, original model based on the following variables: productivity, manufacturability (costs and payback of fertilisers), weighted average indicators of annual mineralisation and humification, as well as the general balance of reproducing soil fertility in the production process. This model allows for the assessment of industry environmental risks and the justification of recommendations on the possibility of their minimisation. For the first time, the parameters of the positive impact of the transition to a market model of vegetable production were described using the criterion of soil fertility reproduction. Practical value / implications. Assessment, modelling, and forecasting of ecologically and economically consistent parameters of production processes in vegetable growing, in addition to scientific interest, is considered as a direct tool for maximising the efficiency of the vegetable market as a whole. In particular, the proposed approach is the basis for substantiating the structure (ratio of crops) and parameters (fertilisation, productivity, costs, efficiency) of vegetable production within the defined limitations of environmental management.

Suggested Citation

  • Lohosha, Roman & Lutkovska, Svitlana & Pidvalna, Oksana & Pronko, Lyudmila & Kolesnyk, Tetiana, . "Ecological optimisation of vegetable production as a factor of the industry capitalisation," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364295
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364295/files/3_Lohosha_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Laborde & Abdullah Mamun & Will Martin & Valeria Piñeiro & Rob Vos, 2021. "Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Amiri, Zahra & Campbell, Daniel E., 2020. "Evaluation of the sustainability of four greenhouse vegetable production ecosystems based on an analysis of emergy and social characteristics”," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 424(C).
    3. Yi-Xuan Lu & Si-Ting Wang & Guan-Xin Yao & Jing Xu, 2023. "Green Total Factor Efficiency in Vegetable Production: A Comprehensive Ecological Analysis of China’s Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
    4. David Tilman & Kenneth G. Cassman & Pamela A. Matson & Rosamond Naylor & Stephen Polasky, 2002. "Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6898), pages 671-677, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulrich Hoffmann, 2011. "Assuring Food Security In Developing Countries Under The Challenges Of Climate Change: Key Trade And Development Issues Of A Fundamental Transformation Of Agriculture," UNCTAD Discussion Papers 201, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    2. Wang, Yunqi & Peng, Yu & Lin, Jiaqi & Wang, Lixin & Jia, Zhikuan & Zhang, Rui, 2023. "Optimal nitrogen management to achieve high wheat grain yield, grain protein content, and water productivity: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Walder, Peter & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2018. "The Environmental Behaviour of Farmers – Capturing the Diversity of Perspectives with a Q Methodological Approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 55-63.
    4. Obafèmi P. Koutchadé & Alain Carpentier & Fabienne Femenia, 2021. "Modeling Corners, Kinks, and Jumps in Crop Acreage Choices: Impacts of the EU Support to Protein Crops," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(4), pages 1502-1524, August.
    5. Abdullah Mamun, 2024. "Impact of farm subsidies on global agricultural productivity," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 346-364, March.
    6. Clay, Nathan & King, Brian, 2019. "Smallholders’ uneven capacities to adapt to climate change amid Africa’s ‘green revolution’: Case study of Rwanda’s crop intensification program," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Hermans, C.M.L. & Geijzendorffer, I.R. & Ewert, F. & Metzger, M.J. & Vereijken, P.H. & Woltjer, G.B. & Verhagen, A., 2010. "Exploring the future of European crop production in a liberalised market, with specific consideration of climate change and the regional competitiveness," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(18), pages 2177-2187.
    8. Song, Xiaoqing & Wang, Xiong & Li, Xinyi & Zhang, Weina & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2021. "Policy-oriented versus market-induced: Factors influencing crop diversity across China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. A B M Nurullah & Most Sanjida Khatun & Liesel Ritchie, 2025. "Industrial Wastewater Disposal and Its Socio-Environmental Consequences: Evidence from the Uttara Export Processing Zone, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Elisa Morri & Riccardo Santolini, 2021. "Ecosystem Services Valuation for the Sustainable Land Use Management by Nature-Based Solution (NbS) in the Common Agricultural Policy Actions: A Case Study on the Foglia River Basin (Marche Region, It," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Jie Cai & Xianli Xia & Haibin Chen & Ting Wang & Huili Zhang, 2018. "Decomposition of Fertilizer Use Intensity and Its Environmental Risk in China’s Grain Production Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    13. Czyżewski, Bazyli & Staniszewski, Jakub, 2015. "Spadek znaczenia renty gruntowej w długim okresie i jego konsekwencje," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 4(169).
    14. Ben-Simchon, Eyal & Grunwald, Yael & Ben-Ari, Giora & Rosenfeld, Arie & Shelef, Oren, 2022. "A village a field? Agronomic evaluation of fruit trees in inhabited space – Lessons for land use policy from a case study in Israel's Sharon Region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    15. Rotchés-Ribalta, Roser & Ó hUallacháin, Daire, "undated". "Agri-Environment Scheme design: the importance of landscape scale," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276204, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Raza, Muhammad Ali & Mohi Ud Din, Atta & Shah, Ghulam Abbas & Zhiqi, Wang & Feng, Ling Yang & Gul, Hina & Yasin, Hassan Shehryar & Shafiq ur Rahman, Mohammad & Juan, Chen & Liang, Xue & Rehman, Raheel, 2024. "Legume choice and planting configuration influence intercrop nutrient and yield gains through complementarity and selection effects in legume-based wheat intercropping systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    17. Zhang, Ting & Li, Peng-Fei & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2025. "Spillover effects between climate policy uncertainty, energy markets, and food markets: A time–frequency analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Shen Yuan & Shaobing Peng, 2017. "Exploring the Trends in Nitrogen Input and Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Agricultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Gaurav Chugh & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Zakaria M. Solaiman, 2021. "Nanobiotechnology for Agriculture: Smart Technology for Combating Nutrient Deficiencies with Nanotoxicity Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist & Helena Hansson & Ulf Sonesson & Stefan Gunnarsson, 2021. "A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature on Sustainability at Farm-Level in Beef and Lamb Meat Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.